Search results

Volltext: NATO-Truppenstatut vom 19.06.1951 Link - Text in English: Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty regarding the Status of their Forces 19 Jun. 1951 https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17265.htm ABKOMMEN ZWISCHEN DEN PARTEIEN DES NORDATLANTIKVERTRAGS ÜBER DIE RECHTSSTELLUNG IHRER TRUPPEN (sog. NATO-Truppenstatut) vom 19.06.1951 (BGBl. 1961 II 1190) Die Parteien des am 4. April 1949 in Washington unterzeichneten Nordatlantikvertrags – In Anbetracht der Tatsache, daß die Truppen einer Vertragspartei nach Vereinbarung zur Ausübung des Dienstes in das Hoheitsgebiet einer anderen Vertragspartei entsandt werden können; In dem Bewußtsein, daß der Beschluß, sie zu entsenden und die Bedingungen, unter denen sie entsandt werden, auch weiterhin Sondervereinbarungen zwischen den beteiligten Vertragsparteien unterliegen, soweit die Bedingungen nicht in diesem Abkommen festgelegt sind; In dem Wunsche jedoch die Rechtsstellung dieser Truppen während ihres Aufenthaltes in dem Hoheitsgebiet einer anderen Vertragspartei festzulegen – sind wie folgt übereingekommen: Artikel I (1) In diesem Abkommen bedeutet der Ausdruck a) „Truppe“ das zu den Land-, See- und Luftstreitkräften gehörende Personal einer Vertragspartei, wenn es sich im Zusammenhang mit seinen Dienstobliegenheiten in dem Hoheitsgebiet einer anderen Vertragspartei innerhalb des Gebietes des Nordatlantikvertrags befindet, mit der Maßgabe jedoch, daß die beiden beteiligten Vertragsparteien vereinbaren können, daß gewisse Personen, Einheiten oder Verbände nicht als eine „Truppe“ im Sinne dieses Abkommens oder als deren Bestandteil anzusehen sind, b) „Ziviles Gefolge“ das die Truppe einer Vertragspartei begleitende Zivilpersonal, das bei den Streitkräften dieser Vertragspartei beschäftigt ist, soweit es sich nicht um Staatenlose handelt oder um Staatsangehörige eines Staates, der nicht Partei des Nordatlantikvertrags ist, oder um Staatsangehörige des Staates, in welchem die Truppe stationiert ist, oder um Personen, die dort ihren gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt haben, c) „Angehöriger“ den Ehegatten eines Mitglieds einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges, sowie ein dem Mitglied gegenüber unterhaltsberechtigtes Kind, d) „Entsendestaat“ die Vertragspartei, der die Truppe angehört, e) „Aufnahmestaat“ die Vertragspartei, in deren Hoheitsgebiet sich die Truppe oder das zivile Gefolge befinden, sei es, daß sie dort stationiert oder auf der Durchreise sind, f) „Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates“ diejenigen Behörden eines Entsendestaates, die nach dessen Recht befugt sind, das Militärrecht dieses Staates auf die Mitglieder seiner Truppe oder zivilen Gefolge anzuwenden, g) „Nordatlantikrat“ den gemäß Artikel 9 des Nordatlantikvertrags errichteten Rat oder die zum Handeln in seinem Namen befugten nachgeordneten Stellen. (2) Dieses Abkommen gilt für die Behörden politischer Untergliederungen der Vertragsparteien innerhalb der Hoheitsgebiete, auf die das Abkommen gemäß Artikel XX angewendet oder erstreckt wird, ebenso wie für die Zentralbehörden dieser Vertragsparteien, jedoch mit der Maßgabe, daß Vermögenswerte, die politischen Untergliederungen gehören, nicht als Vermögenswerte einer Vertragspartei im Sinne des Artikels VIII anzusehen sind. Artikel II Eine Truppe und ihr ziviles Gefolge, ihre Mitglieder sowie deren Angehörige haben die Pflicht, das Recht des Aufnahmestaates zu achten und sich jeder mit dem Geiste dieses Abkommens nicht zu vereinbarenden Tätigkeit, insbesondere jeder politischen Tätigkeit im Aufnahmestaat, zu enthalten. Es ist außerdem die Pflicht des Entsendestaates, die hierfür erforderlichen Maßnahmen zu treffen. Artikel III (1) Unter den in Absatz 2 festgelegten Bedingungen und vorbehaltlich der Erfüllung der von dem Aufnahmestaat für die Ein- und Ausreise einer Truppe oder ihrer Mitglieder vorgeschriebenen Förmlichkeiten sind diese Mitglieder von Paß- und Sichtvermerksbestimmungen sowie von der Einreisekontrolle beim Betreten oder Verlassen des Hoheitsgebietes eines Aufnahmestaates befreit. Sie sind ferner von den Bestimmungen des Aufnahmestaates über die Registrierung und Kontrolle von Ausländern befreit, erwerben jedoch keinerlei Recht auf ständigen Aufenthalt oder Wohnsitz in den Hoheitsgebieten des Aufnahmestaates. (2) Für Mitglieder einer Truppe sind nur die folgenden Urkunden erforderlich. Sie sind auf Verlangen vorzuweisen: a) ein von dem Entsendestaat ausgestellter Personalausweis mit Namen, Geburtsdatum, Dienstgrad und Nummer (falls vorhanden), Waffengattung und Lichtbild; b) ein Einzel- oder Sammelmarschbefehl in der Sprache des Entsendestaates sowie in englischer und französischer Sprache, ausgestellt von einer zuständigen Dienststelle des Entsendestaates oder der Nordatlantikvertrags-Organisation; er muß die Stellung der Einzelperson oder Gruppe als Mitglied einer Truppe bescheinigen und die befohlene Marschbewegung bezeichnen. Der Aufnahmestaat kann verlangen, daß Marschbefehle von seinem zuständigen Vertreter gegengezeichnet werden. (3) Mitglieder eines zivilen Gefolges und Angehörige sind in ihren Pässen als solche zu bezeichnen. (4) Scheidet ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges aus dem Dienst des Entsendestaates aus, ohne heimgeschafft zu werden, so benachrichtigen die Behörden des Entsendestaates unverzüglich die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates unter Angabe aller etwa geforderten Einzelheiten. In entsprechender Weise benachrichtigen die Behörden des Entsendestaates die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates, wenn ein Mitglied sich länger als 21 Tage unerlaubt entfernt hat. (5) Hat der Aufnahmestaat verlangt, daß ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges aus seinem Hoheitsgebiet entfernt wird, oder hat er einen Ausweisungsbefehl gegen ein früheres Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges oder gegen einen Angehörigen eines Mitglieds oder früheren Mitglieds erlassen, so sind die Behörden des Entsendestaates für die Aufnahme der betreffenden Person im eigenen Hoheitsgebiet oder für eine anderweitige Verbringung außerhalb des Aufnahmestaates verantwortlich. Dieser Absatz findet nur auf Personen Anwendung, die nicht Staatsangehörige des Aufnahmestaates sind und die in den Aufnahmestaat als Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges oder um Mitglieder zu werden eingereist sind, sowie auf Angehörige solcher Personen. Artikel IV Der Aufnahmestaat ist verpflichtet, a) entweder ohne Fahrprüfung oder Gebühr die Fahrerlaubnis oder den Führerschein oder den Militärführerschein des Entsendestaates oder einer Untergliederung dieses Staates für ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges als gültig anzuerkennen, b) oder ohne eine Fahrprüfung zu verlangen, seine eigenen Fahrerlaubnisse oder Führerscheine für Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges auszustellen, die eine Fahrerlaubnis, einen Führerschein oder einen Militärführerschein des Entsendestaates oder einer Untergliederung dieses Staates besitzen. Artikel V (1) Die Mitglieder einer Truppe tragen in der Regel Uniform. Vorbehaltlich gegenteiliger Vereinbarungen zwischen den Behörden des Entsende- und des Aufnahmestaates gelten für das Tragen von Zivilkleidung die gleichen Bedingungen wie für Mitglieder der Truppen des Aufnahmestaates. Ordnungsmäßig zusammengesetzte Einheiten oder Verbände einer Truppe tragen beim Überschreiten der Grenze Uniform. (2) Dienstfahrzeuge einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges führen außer ihrer Kennummer ein deutliches Staatszugehörigkeitszeichen. Artikel VI Mitglieder einer Truppe können Waffen besitzen und tragen, vorausgesetzt, daß sie durch ihre Dienstanweisung hierzu befugt sind. Die Behörden des Entsendestaates werden Ersuchen des Aufnahmestaates in diesem Sachbereich wohlwollend erwägen. Artikel VII (1) Vorbehaltlich der Bestimmungen dieses Artikels a) haben die Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates das Recht, innerhalb des Aufnahmestaates die gesamte Straf- und Disziplinargerichtsbarkeit auszuüben, die ihnen durch das Recht des Entsendestaates über alle dem Militärrecht dieses Staates unterworfenen Personen übertragen ist; b) üben die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates über die Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges und über deren Angehörige in bezug auf die innerhalb des Hoheitsgebietes des Aufnahmestaates begangenen und nach dessen Recht strafbaren Handlungen die Gerichtsbarkeit aus. (2) (a) Die Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates haben das Recht, über die dem Militärrecht dieses Staates unterworfenen Personen die ausschließliche Gerichtsbarkeit in bezug auf diejenigen Handlungen, einschließlich Handlungen gegen die Sicherheit dieses Staates, auszuüben, welche nach dem Recht des Entsendestaates, jedoch nicht nach dem Recht des Aufnahmestaates strafbar sind. b) Die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates haben das Recht, über Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges und deren Angehörige die ausschließliche Gerichtsbarkeit in bezug auf diejenigen Handlungen, einschließlich Handlungen gegen die Sicherheit dieses Staates, auszuüben, welche nach dessen Recht, jedoch nicht nach dem Recht des Entsendestaates strafbar sind. c) Im Sinne dieses Absatzes und des Absatzes 3 sind strafbare Handlungen gegen die Sicherheit eines Staates i) Hochverrat, ii) Sabotage, Spionage oder Verletzung eines Gesetzes, das sich auf Amtsgeheimnisse dieses Staates oder auf Geheimnisse im Zusammenhang mit der Landesverteidigung dieses Staates bezieht. (3) In Fällen konkurrierender Gerichtsbarkeit gelten die folgenden Regeln: a) Die Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates haben das Vorrecht auf Ausübung der Gerichtsbarkeit über ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges in bezug auf i) strafbare Handlungen, die nur gegen das Vermögen oder die Sicherheit dieses Staates oder nur gegen die Person oder das Vermögen eines anderen Mitglieds der Truppe oder des zivilen Gefolges dieses Staates oder eines Angehörigen gerichtet sind; ii) strafbare Handlungen, die sich aus einer Handlung oder Unterlassung in Ausübung des Dienstes ergeben. b) Bei allen sonstigen strafbaren Handlungen haben die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates das Vorrecht auf Ausübung der Gerichtsbarkeit. c) Beschließt der bevorrechtigte Staat, die Gerichtsbarkeit nicht auszuüben, so teilt er dies den Behörden des anderen Staates sobald wie möglich mit. Die Behörden des bevorrechtigten Staates ziehen die von den Behörden des anderen Staates an sie gerichteten Ersuchen um Verzicht auf das Vorrecht in wohlwollende Erwägung, wenn der andere Staat einem derartigen Verzicht besondere Wichtigkeit beimißt. (4) Aus den Bestimmungen der Absätze 1 bis 3 ergibt sich für die Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates nicht das Recht, die Gerichtsbarkeit über Personen auszuüben, die Staatsangehörige des Aufnahmestaates sind oder dort ihren gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt haben, es sei denn, daß diese Personen Mitglieder der Truppe des Entsendestaates sind. (5) a) Die Behörden des Aufnahme- und des Entsendestaates unterstützen sich gegenseitig bei der Festnahme von Mitgliedern einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges oder von deren Angehörigen im Hoheitsgebiet des Aufnahmestaates und bei der Übergabe dieser Personen an die Behörde, die gemäß den obigen Bestimmungen die Gerichtsbarkeit auszuüben hat. b) Die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates unterrichten die Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates unverzüglich von der Festnahme eines Mitglieds einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges oder eines Angehörigen. c) Ein einer strafbaren Handlung beschuldigtes Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges, über das der Aufnahmestaat die Gerichtsbarkeit auszuüben hat, verbleibt, falls es sich in den Händen des Entsendestaates befindet, in dessen Gewahrsam, bis es von dem Aufnahmestaat unter Anklage gestellt wird. (6) a) Die Behörden des Aufnahme- und des Entsendestaates unterstützen sich gegenseitig bei der Durchführung aller erforderlichen Ermittlungen in Strafsachen sowie bei der Beschaffung von Beweismitteln, einschließlich der Beschlagnahme und geeignetenfalls der Aushändigung von Gegenständen, die mit einer strafbaren Handlung im Zusammenhang stehen. Die Aushändigung derartiger Gegenstände kann jedoch von deren Rückgabe innerhalb einer von der aushändigenden Behörde bestimmten Frist abhängig gemacht werden. b) Die Behörden der Vertragsparteien unterrichten sich in allen Fällen, in denen ihre Gerichtsbarkeit konkurriert, darüber, was veranlaßt worden ist. (7) (a) Todesurteile werden durch die Behörden des Entsendestaates nicht im Aufnahmestaat vollstreckt, wenn das Recht des Aufnahmestaates in entsprechenden Fällen diese Strafe nicht vorsieht. b) Die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates werden Ersuchen der Behörden des Entsendestaates um Unterstützung bei der Vollstreckung von Freiheitsstrafen, die von den Behörden des Entsendestaates auf Grund dieses Artikels innerhalb des Hoheitsgebietes des Aufnahmestaates ausgesprochen worden sind, wohlwollend prüfen. (8) Wenn ein Angeklagter in einem Strafverfahren, das nach diesem Artikel von den Behörden einer Vertragspartei gegen ihn durchgeführt wurde, freigesprochen worden ist oder wenn er in einem solchen Verfahren verurteilt worden ist und seine Strafe verbüßt oder verbüßt hat oder begnadigt worden ist, kann nicht wegen derselben Handlung innerhalb desselben Hoheitsgebietes von den Behörden einer anderen Vertragspartei erneut vor Gericht gestellt werden. Dieser Absatz schließt nicht aus, daß die Militärbehörden des Entsendestaates ein Mitglied der Truppe dieses Staates wegen eines Dienstvergehens belangen, das in einer Handlung oder Unterlassung liegt, derentwegen von den Behörden einer anderen Vertragspartei ein Strafverfahren gegen dieses Mitglied durchgeführt wurde. (9) Wird ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges oder ein Angehöriger unter der Gerichtsbarkeit eines Aufnahmestaates strafrechtlich verfolgt, so hat er das Recht a) auf alsbaldige und schnelle Verhandlung; b) vor der Verhandlung über die gegen ihn erhobenen Beschuldigungen unterrichtet zu werden; c) den Belastungszeugen gegenübergestellt zu werden; d) Entlastungszeugen laden und vorführen zu lassen, wenn diese der Gerichtsbarkeit des Aufnahmestaates unterstehen; e) auf Vertretung durch einen Verteidiger eigener Wahl oder durch einen nach Maßgabe der jeweils in dem Aufnahmestaat geltenden Bedingungen gebührenfrei oder zu ermäßigten Gebühren bestellten Verteidiger; f) falls er es für notwendig hält, auf die Dienste eines befähigten Dolmetschers; g) sich mit einem Vertreter der Regierung des Entsendestaates in Verbindung zu setzen sowie, wenn es die Verfahrensvorschriften gestatten, auf Anwesenheit eines solchen Vertreters bei der Verhandlung. (10) a) Ordnungsmäßig aufgestellte militärische Einheiten oder Verbände einer Truppe haben die Polizeigewalt in allen Lagern, Anwesen oder anderen Liegenschaften, die sie auf Grund einer Vereinbarung mit dem Aufnahmestaat innehaben. Die Militärpolizei der Truppe kann alle geeigneten Maßnahmen treffen, um die Ordnung und Sicherheit innerhalb dieser Liegenschaften aufrechtzuerhalten. b) Außerhalb dieser Liegenschaften darf die Militärpolizei nur nach Maßgabe von Abmachungen mit den Behörden des Aufnahmestaates und in Verbindung mit diesen und nur so weit eingesetzt werden, wie dies zur Aufrechterhaltung der Disziplin und Ordnung unter den Mitgliedern der Truppe erforderlich ist. (11) Jede Vertragspartei strebt diejenigen gesetzgeberischen Maßnahmen an, die sie für erforderlich hält, um sicherzustellen, daß innerhalb ihres Hoheitsgebietes die Sicherheit und der Schutz von Anlagen, Ausrüstungs- und sonstigen Vermögensgegenständen, amtlichen Schriftstücken und amtlichen Kenntnissen anderer Vertragsparteien sowie die Bestrafung von Zuwiderhandlungen gegen die zu diesem Zwecke erlassenen Gesetze hinreichend gewährleistet sind. Artikel VIII (1) Jede Vertragspartei verzichtet auf alle Ansprüche gegen eine andere Vertragspartei wegen Beschädigung von Vermögenswerten, die ihr gehören und von ihren Land-, See- oder Luftstreitkräften benutzt werden, wenn der Schaden i) von einem Mitglied oder einem Bediensteten der Streitkräfte der anderen Vertragspartei in Ausübung seiner Dienstobliegenheiten im Zusammenhang mit der Durchführung des Nordatlantikvertrags verursacht wurde; oder ii) durch die Benutzung von Land-, Wasser- oder Luftfahrzeugen entstanden ist, die der anderen Vertragspartei gehören und von deren Streitkräften benutzt werden, vorausgesetzt, daß entweder das den Schaden verursachende Fahrzeug oder der beschädigte Vermögensgegenstand im Zusammenhang mit der Durchführung des Nordatlantikvertrags verwendet wurden. Auf Ansprüche einer Vertragspartei gegen eine andere Vertragspartei aus Bergung und Hilfeleistung zur See wird verzichtet, vorausgesetzt, daß das geborgene Schiff oder die geborgene Ladung einer Vertragspartei gehörte und von ihren Streitkräften im Zusammenhang mit der Durchführung des Nordatlantikvertrags verwendet wurde. (2) a) Im Falle von Schäden, die an anderen einer Vertragspartei gehörenden und in ihrem Hoheitsgebiet befindlichen Vermögenswerten in der in Absatz 1 bezeichneten Weise verursacht worden oder entstanden sind, wird über die Haftung einer anderen Vertragspartei und über die Höhe des Schadens durch einen nach Buchstabe b ausgewählten Einzelschiedsrichter entschieden, es sei denn, daß die beteiligten Vertragsparteien etwas anderes vereinbaren. Der Schiedsrichter entscheidet auch über alle aus dem gleichen Ereignis entstehenden Gegenansprüche. b) Der unter Buchstabe a vorgesehene Schiedsrichter wird im Einvernehmen zwischen den beteiligten Vertragsparteien aus den Staatsangehörigen des Aufnahmestaates ausgewählt, die hohe richterliche Ämter innehaben oder innegehabt haben. Können die betreffenden Vertragsparteien sich nicht innerhalb von zwei Monaten über den Schiedsrichter einigen, so kann jede von ihnen den Vorsitzenden der Stellvertreter im Nordatlantikrat ersuchen, eine Person auszuwählen, die die obengenannten Voraussetzungen erfüllt. c) Die Entscheidung des Schiedsrichters ist für die Vertragsparteien bindend und endgültig. d) Der Betrag der von dem Schiedsrichter zuerkannten Entschädigung wird nach Absatz 5 Buchstabe e Ziffern i), ii) und iii) aufgeteilt. e) Die Vergütung für den Schiedsrichter wird im Einvernehmen zwischen den beteiligten Vertragsparteien festgesetzt und, ebenso wie die bei der Durchführung seiner Aufgaben entstehenden Kosten, von ihnen zu gleichen Teilen getragen. f) Jede Vertragspartei verzichtet gleichwohl auf ihre Ansprüche in allen Fällen, in denen der Schaden weniger beträgt als: Belgien: bfrs. 70000 Kanada: $ 1460 Dänemark: Kr. 9670 Frankreich: ffrs. 490 000 Island: Kr. 22 800 Italien: Li. 850 000 Luxemburg: lfrs. 70 000 Niederlande: Fl. 5320 Norwegen: Kr. 10 000 Portugal: Escu. 40 250 Vereinigtes Königreich: £ 500 Vereinigte Staaten: $ 1400. Jede andere Vertragspartei, deren Vermögenswerte bei dem gleichen Ereignis beschädigt worden sind, verzichtet ebenfalls bis zur Höhe des obengenannten Betrages auf ihren Anspruch. Im Falle beträchtlicher Veränderung in den Wechselkursen zwischen diesen Währungen einigen sich die Vertragsparteien über die entsprechende Berichtigung der obengenannten Beträge. (3) Im Sinne der Absätze 1 und 2 umfaßt der Ausdruck „einer Vertragspartei gehörend“ auch Schiffe, die von der Vertragspartei als unbemannte Schiffe gechartert oder in Anspruch genommen oder von ihr als Prise beschlagnahmt worden sind (jedoch nur, soweit die Gefahr des Verlustes oder der Haftung nicht von einer anderen Person als dieser Vertragspartei getragen wird). (4) Jede Vertragspartei verzichtet auf alle Ansprüche gegen eine andere Vertragspartei, die darauf beruhen, daß ein Mitglied ihrer Streitkräfte in Ausübung des Dienstes eine Körperverletzung oder den Tod erlitten hat. (5) Ansprüche (ausgenommen vertragliche Ansprüche und Ansprüche, auf welche die Absätze 6 und 7 Anwendung finden), die sich daraus ergeben, daß durch Handlungen oder Unterlassungen von Mitgliedern einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges in Ausübung des Dienstes oder durch eine andere Handlung, Unterlassung oder Begebenheit, für die eine Truppe oder ein ziviles Gefolge rechtlich verantwortlich ist, in dem Hoheitsgebiet des Aufnahmestaates einem Dritten, mit Ausnahme der Vertragsparteien, ein Schaden zugefügt worden ist, werden von dem Aufnahmestaat nach folgenden Bestimmungen behandelt: a) Die Geltendmachung, Prüfung und außergerichtliche Regelung der Entschädigungsansprüche oder die gerichtliche Entscheidung über sie erfolgt gemäß den Gesetzen und Bestimmungen des Aufnahmestaates, die insoweit für seine eigenen Streitkräfte gelten. b) Der Aufnahmestaat kann alle derartigen Ansprüche regeln, er zahlt die Entschädigungsbeträge in seiner Währung. c) Eine derartige Zahlung, gleichviel ob sie auf Grund einer außergerichtlichen Regelung der Sache oder einer Entscheidung eines zuständigen Gerichtes des Aufnahmestaates erfolgt, oder ein rechtskräftiges, klageabweisendes Urteil eines solchen Gerichtes ist für die Vertragsparteien bindend und endgültig. d) Jeder von dem Aufnahmestaat beglichene Anspruch wird den beteiligten Entsendestaaten mit einem alle Einzelheiten umfassenden Bericht und mit einem Aufteilungsvorschlag gemäß Buchstabe e, Ziffern i), ii) und iii) mitgeteilt. Äußert sich der Entsendestaat nicht binnen zwei Monaten, so gilt der Vorschlag als angenommen. e) Die zur Befriedigung von Ansprüchen auf Grund der Buchstaben a bis d und des Absatzes 2 zu zahlenden Beträge sind von den Vertragsparteien in folgendem Verhältnis zu tragen: i) Ist ein Entsendestaat allein verantwortlich, so wird der Entschädigungsbetrag im Verhältnis von 25 vH zu Lasten des Aufnahmestaates und 75 vH zu Lasten des Entsendestaates aufgeteilt. ii) Ist mehr als ein Staat für den Schaden verantwortlich, so wird der Entschädigungsbetrag gleichmäßig auf sie aufgeteilt; ist der Aufnahmestaat jedoch nicht unter den verantwortlichen Staaten, so beträgt sein Anteil die Hälfte des Anteils, der auf jeden Entsendestaat entfällt. iii) Wurde der Schaden von den Streitkräften der Vertragsparteien verursacht und ist es nicht möglich, ihn mit Bestimmtheit einer oder mehreren dieser Streitkräfte zuzurechnen, so wird der Entschädigungsbetrag gleichmäßig auf die beteiligten Vertragsparteien aufgeteilt; ist jedoch der Aufnahmestaat nicht unter den Staaten, durch deren Streitkräfte der Schaden verursacht wurde, so beträgt sein Anteil die Hälfte des Anteils, der auf jeden der beteiligten Entsendestaaten entfällt. iv) Jedes halbe Jahr übermittelt der Aufnahmestaat den beteiligten Entsendestaaten mit dem Ersuchen um Erstattung eine Aufstellung der Beträge, die er im Laufe des Halbjahres in den Fällen gezahlt hat, in denen die vorgeschlagene prozentuale Aufteilung angenommen wurde. Die Erstattung erfolgt innerhalb der kürzestmöglichen Zeit in der Währung des Aufnahmestaates. f) In Fällen, in denen die Anwendung der Bestimmungen der Buchstaben b und e für eine Vertragspartei ernstliche Härten mit sich bringen würde, kann diese den Nordatlantikrat ersuchen, eine abweichende Regelung zu treffen. g) Ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges darf einem Verfahren zur Vollstreckung eines Urteils nicht unterworfen werden, das in dem Aufnahmestaat in einer aus der Ausübung des Dienstes herrührenden Angelegenheit gegen ihn ergangen ist. h) Mit Ausnahme der Anwendung von Buchstabe e auf Ansprüche, die unter Absatz 2 fallen, gilt Absatz 5 nicht für Ansprüche aus oder im Zusammenhang mit der Navigation oder dem Betrieb eines Schiffes oder dem Verladen, der Beförderung oder dem Entladen einer Schiffsladung, es sei denn, daß es sich um Ansprüche wegen Todes oder Körperverletzung handelt, auf welche Absatz 4 keine Anwendung findet. (6) Ansprüche gegen Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges aus zu Schadensersatz verpflichtenden Handlungen oder Unterlassungen im Aufnahmestaat, die nicht in Ausübung des Dienstes begangen worden sind, werden wie folgt behandelt: a) Die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates prüfen den Anspruch, ermitteln in billiger und gerechter Weise unter Berücksichtigung aller Umstände des Falles einschließlich des Verhaltens der verletzten Person den dem Antragsteller zukommenden Betrag und fertigen einen Bericht über die Angelegenheit an. b) Der Bericht wird den Behörden des Entsendestaates übergeben, die dann unverzüglich entscheiden, ob, und bejahendenfalls in welcher Höhe sie eine Abfindung ohne Anerkennung einer Rechtspflicht (ex gratia payment) anbieten wollen. c) Wird eine Abfindung ohne Anerkennung einer Rechtspflicht angeboten und wird dieses Angebot von dem Antragsteller als volle Befriedigung seines Anspruchs angenommen, so nehmen die Behörden des Entsendestaates die Zahlung selbst vor und unterrichten die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates über ihre Entscheidung und die Höhe des gezahlten Betrages. d) Die Bestimmungen dieses Absatzes lassen die Zuständigkeit der Gerichte des Aufnahmestaates für die Durchführung eines Verfahrens gegen ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges unberührt, sofern und solange nicht eine Zahlung als volle Befriedigung des Anspruchs geleistet worden ist. (7) Ansprüche, die sich aus der unbefugten Benutzung von Fahrzeugen der Streitkräfte eines Entsendestaates ergeben, werden gemäß Absatz 6 behandelt, es sei denn, daß die Truppe oder das zivile Gefolge rechtlich verantwortlich ist. (8) Entsteht Streit darüber, ob eine zu Schadensersatz verpflichtende Handlung oder Unterlassung eines Mitgliedes einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges in Ausübung des Dienstes begangen worden ist, oder ob die Benutzung eines Fahrzeuges der Streitkräfte eines Entsendestaates unbefugt war, so ist die Frage einem gemäß Absatz 2 Buchstabe b ernannten Schiedsrichter vorzulegen, dessen Entscheidung über diesen Punkt endgültig und unanfechtbar ist. (9) Hinsichtlich der Zivilgerichtsbarkeit des Aufnahmestaates darf der Entsendestaat für Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges keine Befreiung von der Gerichtsbarkeit des Aufnahmestaates über Absatz 5 Buchstabe g hinaus beanspruchen. (10) Die Behörden des Entsendestaates und des Aufnahmestaates arbeiten bei der Beschaffung von Beweismitteln für eine gerechte Untersuchung und Erledigung von Ansprüchen, welche die Vertragsparteien betreffen, zusammen. Artikel IX (1) Die Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges und ihre Angehörigen können unter den gleichen Bedingungen wie die Staatsangehörigen des Aufnahmestaates an Ort und Stelle die für ihren eigenen Verbrauch erforderlichen Waren erwerben und sich die von ihnen benötigten Leistungen erbringen lassen. (2) Die aus örtlichen Quellen für den Unterhalt einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges benötigten Waren werden in der Regel durch die Behörden beschafft, die solche Waren für die Streitkräfte des Aufnahmestaates beschaffen. Um Beschaffungen zu vermeiden, die sich auf die Wirtschaft des Aufnahmestaates schädlich auswirken würden, benennen die zuständigen Behörden dieses Staates erforderlichenfalls diejenigen Waren, deren Beschaffung eingeschränkt oder untersagt werden sollte. (3) Vorbehaltlich von Vereinbarungen, die bereits in Kraft sind oder zwischen bevollmächtigten Vertretern der Entsende- und der Aufnahmestaaten hernach etwa geschlossen werden, übernehmen allein die Behörden des Aufnahmestaates die Verantwortung dafür, daß geeignete Maßnahmen getroffen werden, um einer Truppe oder einem zivilen Gefolge die von ihnen benötigten Liegenschaften sowie die zugehörigen Einrichtungen und Leistungen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Diese Vereinbarungen und Maßnahmen haben soweit wie möglich den Vorschriften über die Unterbringung des vergleichbaren Personals des Aufnahmestaates zu entsprechen. Soweit keine besondere entgegenstehende Vereinbarung getroffen ist, sind für die Rechte und Pflichten aus der Belegung oder der Benutzung der Liegenschaften, Einrichtungen oder Leistungen die Gesetze des Aufnahmestaates maßgebend. (4) Der örtliche Bedarf einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges an zivilen Arbeitskräften wird in gleicher Weise wie der vergleichbare Bedarf des Aufnahmestaates und mit Unterstützung seiner Behörde über die Arbeitsvermittlungsstellen befriedigt. Die Anstellungs- und Arbeitsbedingungen, insbesondere die Löhne und Gehälter, die Zuschläge und die Arbeitsschutzbedingungen, bestimmen sich nach dem Recht des Aufnahmestaates. Solche bei einer Truppe oder einem zivilen Gefolge beschäftigten zivilen Arbeitnehmer gelten in keiner Beziehung als Mitglieder dieser Truppe oder dieses zivilen Gefolges. (5) Stehen einer Truppe oder einem zivilen Gefolge an deren Stationierungsort keine ausreichenden eigenen ärztlichen oder zahnärztlichen Dienste zur Verfügung, so kann ihren Mitgliedern und deren Angehörigen ärztliche und zahnärztliche Behandlung einschließlich Krankenhausaufenthalt zu den gleichen Bedingungen gewährt werden wie dem vergleichbaren Personal des Aufnahmestaates. (6) Der Aufnahmestaat wird Anträge auf Gewährung von Reiseerleichterungen und tariflichen Vergünstigungen an Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges wohlwollend prüfen. Diese Erleichterungen und Vergünstigungen werden Gegenstand besonderer Vereinbarungen zwischen den beteiligten Regierungen sein. (7) Vorbehaltlich allgemeiner oder besonderer finanzieller Vereinbarungen zwischen den Vertragsparteien werden für Warenlieferungen, Unterbringung und sonstige Leistungen, die auf Grund der Absätze 2, 3, 4 und erforderlichenfalls 5 und 6 erfolgt sind, die in Ortswährung zu entrichtenden Zahlungen von den Behörden der Truppe unverzüglich geleistet. (8) Weder eine Truppe noch ein ziviles Gefolge noch ihre Mitglieder oder deren Angehörige genießen auf Grund dieses Artikels Befreiung von Steuern oder sonstigen Abgaben, die nach dem Abgabenrecht des Aufnahmestaates in bezug auf den Erwerb von Gütern und Leistungen zu entrichten sind. Artikel X (1) Hängt in dem Aufnahmestaat die Verpflichtung zur Leistung einer Steuer vom Aufenthalt oder Wohnsitz ab, so gelten die Zeitabschnitte, in denen sich ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges nur in dieser Eigenschaft im Hoheitsgebiet dieses Staates aufhält, im Sinne dieser Steuerpflicht nicht als Zeiten des Aufenthalts in diesem Gebiet oder als Änderung des Aufenthaltsortes oder Wohnsitzes. Die Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges sind in dem Aufnahmestaat von jeder Steuer auf Bezüge und Einkünfte befreit, die ihnen in ihrer Eigenschaft als derartige Mitglieder von dem Entsendestaat gezahlt werden, sowie von jeder Steuer auf die ihnen gehörenden beweglichen Sachen, die sich nur deshalb in dem Aufnahmestaat befinden, weil sich das Mitglied vorübergehend dort aufhält. (2) Die Besteuerung von Mitgliedern einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges hinsichtlich gewinnbringender Tätigkeiten, die sie etwa im Aufnahmestaat ausüben, mit Ausnahme der Tätigkeit in ihrer Eigenschaft als Mitglieder der Truppe oder des zivilen Gefolges, wird durch diesen Artikel nicht ausgeschlossen; soweit es sich nicht um die in Absatz 1 genannten Bezüge, Einkünfte und beweglichen Sachen handelt, steht dieser Artikel der Erhebung von solchen Steuern nicht entgegen, denen die Mitglieder nach dem Recht des Aufnahmestaates auch dann unterliegen, wenn sie so behandelt werden, als hätten sie ihren Aufenthalt oder Wohnsitz außerhalb des Hoheitsgebietes dieses Staates. (3) Dieser Artikel findet keine Anwendung auf die im Artikel XI Absatz 12 begrifflich bestimmten „Zölle“. (4) Im Sinne dieses Artikels umfaßt der Ausdruck „Mitglied einer Truppe“ nicht Personen, die Staatsangehörige des Aufnahmestaates sind. Artikel XI (1) Vorbehaltlich der durch dieses Abkommen ausdrücklich festgelegten Abweichungen unterstehen die Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges sowie deren Angehörige den Gesetzen und Bestimmungen, für deren Durchführung die Zollverwaltung des Aufnahmestaates zuständig ist. Die Zollbediensteten des Aufnahmestaates haben insbesondere das Recht, unter den allgemeinen, durch die Gesetze und Bestimmungen des Aufnahmestaates festgelegten Bedingungen die Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges und deren Angehörige, ihr Gepäck und ihre Fahrzeuge zu durchsuchen und gemäß diesen Gesetzen und Bestimmungen Gegenstände zu beschlagnahmen. (2) a) Die vorübergehende Einfuhr und die Wiederausfuhr mit eigener Kraft fahrender Dienstfahrzeuge einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges sind gegen Vorweisung eines Triptiks nach dem als Anlage zu diesem Abkommen beigefügten Muster ohne Erhebung von Zöllen statthaft. b) Die vorübergehende Einfuhr nicht mit eigener Kraft fahrender Dienstfahrzeuge erfolgt gemäß Absatz 4, ihre Wiederausfuhr gemäß Absatz 8. c) Dienstfahrzeuge einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges sind von allen Abgaben befreit, die wegen der Verwendung der Fahrzeuge im Straßenverkehr erhoben werden. (3) Amtliche Urkunden, die amtlich versiegelt sind, unterliegen nicht der Zollkontrolle. Die Kuriere, die diese Urkunden befördern, müssen ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Stellung im Besitz eines gemäß Artikel III Absatz 2 Buchstabe b ausgestellten Einzelmarschbefehls sein. Aus diesem Marschbefehl muß die Zahl der beförderten Sendungen zu ersehen und es muß darin bestätigt sein, daß diese Sendungen nur amtliche Schriftstücke enthalten. (4) Eine Truppe kann ihre Ausrüstung und angemessene Mengen von Verpflegung, Versorgungsgütern und sonstigen Waren zollfrei einführen, die zur ausschließlichen Verwendung durch die Truppe und, falls der Aufnahmestaat dies genehmigt, auch zur Verwendung durch das zivile Gefolge und die Angehörigen bestimmt sind. Diese zollfreie Einfuhr ist davon abhängig, daß bei der Zollstelle des Einfuhrortes zusammen mit den vereinbarten Zollurkunden eine Bescheinigung hinterlegt wird, deren Form zwischen dem Aufnahmestaat und dem Entsendestaat vereinbart wird und die von einer durch den Entsendestaat hierzu ermächtigten Person unterzeichnet ist. Die Benennung der zur Unterzeichnung der Bescheinigungen ermächtigten Person sowie Proben ihrer Unterschrift und der zu verwendenden Stempel werden der Zollverwaltung des Aufnahmestaates übermittelt. (5) Ein Mitglied einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges kann, wenn es erstmalig zum Antritt seines Dienstes in dem Aufnahmestaat eintrifft oder wenn ein Angehöriger erstmalig eintrifft, um sich ihm anzuschließen, seine persönliche Habe und seinen Hausrat für die Dauer seines dienstlichen Aufenthalts zollfrei einführen. (6) Die Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges können ihre privaten Kraftfahrzeuge für ihren persönlichen Gebrauch oder für den ihres Angehörigen vorübergehend zollfrei einführen. Diese Bestimmung begründet keine Verpflichtung zur Befreiung von Abgaben, die wegen der Verwendung privater Kraftfahrzeuge im Straßenverkehr erhoben werden. (7) Einfuhren durch die Behörden einer Truppe, die für andere Zwecke als zur ausschließlichen Verwendung durch diese Truppe und ihr ziviles Gefolge bestimmt sind, sowie Einfuhren durch Mitglieder einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges, mit Ausnahme der in den Absätzen 5 und 6 behandelten Einfuhren, genießen auf Grund dieses Artikels keine Befreiung von Zöllen oder Einfuhrvorschriften. (8) Waren, die auf Grund der Absätze 2 Buchstabe b, 4, 5 oder 6 zollfrei eingeführt worden sind, dürfen a) frei wiederausgeführt werden, wobei für die auf Grund von Absatz 4 eingeführten Waren der Zollstelle eine nach jenem Absatz ausgestellte Bescheinigung vorzulegen ist; die Zollbehörden können jedoch nachprüfen, ob die wiederausgeführten Waren mit den in der gegebenenfalls erforderlichen Bescheinigung aufgeführten Waren übereinstimmen, sowie ob sie wirklich gemäß den je nach Lage des Falles in Betracht kommenden Absätzen 2 Buchstabe b, 4, 5 oder 6 eingeführt wurden; b) im Aufnahmestaat in der Regel weder entgeltlich noch unentgeltlich veräußert werden; in besonderen Fällen kann jedoch eine Veräußerung unter Bedingungen gestattet werden, die von den zuständigen Behörden des Aufnahmestaates festgelegt werden (zB gegen Zahlung der Zölle und Abgaben, sowie Erfüllung der Erfordernisse der Außenhandels- und Devisenkontrolle). (9) Die Ausfuhr von Waren, die im Aufnahmestaat gekauft wurden, ist nur nach den in diesem Staat geltenden Vorschriften statthaft. (10) Die Zollbehörden gewähren ordnungsmäßig aufgestellten Einheiten oder Verbänden besondere Erleichterungen für den Grenzübertritt, vorausgesetzt, daß die beteiligten Zollbehörden vorher ordnungsgemäß unterrichtet worden sind. (11) Der Aufnahmestaat trifft besondere Anordnungen, damit die Heiz-, Treib- und Schmierstoffe für die im dienstlichen Gebrauch stehenden Land-, Luft- und Wasserfahrzeuge einer Truppe oder eines zivilen Gefolges frei von allen Zöllen und Abgaben geliefert werden können. (12) Im Sinne der Absätze 1 bis 10 sind unter „Zöllen“ Zollabgaben und alle anderen Abgaben und Steuern zu verstehen, mit denen die Einfuhr oder die Ausfuhr belegt wird, mit Ausnahme von Gebühren und Abgaben, die nur eine Abgeltung für geleistete Dienste darstellen: schließt der Ausdruck „Einfuhr“ die Entnahme von Waren aus einem Zollager oder aus ständiger Zollaufsicht ein, sofern die betreffenden Waren in dem Aufnahmestaat nicht geerntet, gewonnen, erzeugt oder hergestellt worden sind. (13) Dieser Artikel findet auf die betreffenden Waren nicht nur Anwendung, wenn sie in den Aufnahmestaat eingeführt oder aus ihm ausgeführt werden, sondern auch dann, wenn sie durch das Hoheitsgebiet einer Vertragspartei hindurch befördert werden; insoweit ist in diesem Artikel unter dem Ausdruck „Aufnahmestaat“ auch jede Vertragspartei zu verstehen, durch deren Hoheitsgebiet die Waren befördert werden. Artikel XII (1) Die Zoll- oder Steuerbehörden des Aufnahmestaates können die Bewilligung aller in diesem Abkommen vorgesehenen Befreiungen oder Erleichterungen auf dem Gebiete des Zoll- oder Steuerwesens davon abhängig machen, daß die Bedingungen eingehalten werden, die sie zur Verhinderung von Mißbräuchen gegebenenfalls für erforderlich halten. (2) Die in Absatz 1 genannten Behörden können jede in diesem Abkommen vorgesehene Befreiung ablehnen, wenn es sich um die Einfuhr von Waren in den Aufnahmestaat handelt, die dort geerntet, gewonnen, erzeugt oder hergestellt und bei deren Ausfuhr aus dem Aufnahmestaat Steuern oder sonstige Abgaben nicht erhoben oder aber zurückerstattet worden sind, die ohne diese Ausfuhr hätten entrichtet werden müssen. Die Entnahme von Waren aus einem Zollager gilt als Einfuhr, wenn die Einlagerung in das Zollager als Ausfuhr behandelt wurde. Artikel XIII (1) Um Zuwiderhandlungen gegen zollrechtliche und steuerrechtliche Gesetze und Vorschriften zu bekämpfen, leisten die Behörden des Aufnahme- und des Entsendestaates bei der Vornahme von Ermittlungen und der Beschaffung von Beweismitteln einander Beistand. (2) Die Behörden einer Truppe gewähren alle in ihrer Macht liegende Unterstützung, damit Waren, die der Beschlagnahme durch oder für die Zoll- oder Steuerbehörden des Aufnahmestaates unterliegen, diesen Behörden übergeben werden. (3) Die Behörden einer Truppe gewähren alle in ihrer Macht liegende Unterstützung, um die Zahlung der von Mitgliedern dieser Truppe oder des zivilen Gefolges oder von deren Angehörigen geschuldeten Zölle, sonstigen Abgaben und Geldstrafen sicherzustellen. (4) Die Dienstfahrzeuge und die Waren, die einer Truppe oder ihrem zivilen Gefolge, nicht jedoch deren Mitgliedern gehören und von den Behörden des Aufnahmestaates im Zusammenhang mit einer Zoll- oder Steuerzuwiderhandlung beschlagnahmt worden sind, werden den zuständigen Behörden der betreffenden Truppe übergeben. Artikel XIV (1) Eine Truppe, ein ziviles Gefolge und ihre Mitglieder sowie deren Angehörige unterstehen weiterhin den Devisenvorschriften des Entsendestaates und außerdem den Vorschriften des Aufnahmestaates. (2) Die für den Devisenverkehr zuständigen Behörden des Entsende- und des Aufnahmestaates können Sonderbestimmungen erlassen, die auf eine Truppe, ein ziviles Gefolge, ihre Mitglieder oder deren Angehörige Anwendung finden. Artikel XV (1) Vorbehaltlich der Bestimmungen des Absatzes 2 bleibt dieses Abkommen im Falle von Feindseligkeiten, auf die der Nordatlantikvertrag Anwendung findet, in Kraft; die Bestimmungen der Absätze 2 und 5 des Artikels VIII über die Regelung von Entschädigungsansprüchen finden jedoch auf Kriegsschäden keine Anwendung, und die beteiligten Vertragsparteien überprüfen unverzüglich die Bestimmungen dieses Abkommens, insbesondere der Artikel III und VII, wobei sie Änderungen vereinbaren können, die ihnen in bezug auf die Anwendung des Abkommens zwischen ihnen etwa wünschenswert erscheinen. (2) Unter Einhaltung einer Frist von 50 Tagen nach Benachrichtigung der anderen Vertragsparteien hat jede Vertragspartei im Falle derartiger Feindseligkeiten das Recht, die Anwendung jeder beliebigen Bestimmung dieses Abkommens soweit erforderlich auszusetzen. Wird dieses Recht ausgeübt, so treten die Vertragsparteien unverzüglich in Beratungen untereinander ein, um sich über geeignete Bestimmungen als Ersatz für die außer Anwendung gesetzten Bestimmungen zu einigen. Artikel XVI Alle Streitigkeiten zwischen den Vertragsparteien in bezug auf die Auslegung oder Anwendung dieses Abkommens werden durch Verhandlungen zwischen ihnen ohne Inanspruchnahme außenstehender Gerichte geregelt. Soweit dieses Abkommen nicht etwas anderes bestimmt, werden alle Streitigkeiten, die durch unmittelbare Verhandlungen nicht geregelt werden können, dem Nordatlantikrat unterbreitet. Artikel XVII Jede Vertragspartei kann jederzeit die Revision eines jeden Artikels dieses Abkommens beantragen. Der Antrag ist an den Nordatlantikrat zu richten. Artikel XVIII (1) Dieses Abkommen bedarf der Ratifizierung; die Ratifikationsurkunden werden sobald wie möglich bei der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika hinterlegt; diese notifiziert jedem Unterzeichnerstaat den Zeitpunkt jeder Hinterlegung. (2) Dieses Abkommen tritt dreißig Tage nach Hinterlegung der Ratifikationsurkunden durch die vier Unterzeichnerstaaten zwischen diesen in Kraft. Für jeden anderen Unterzeichnerstaat tritt es dreißig Tage nach Hinterlegung seiner Ratifikationsurkunden in Kraft. (3) Nach dem Inkrafttreten dieses Abkommens kann ihm vorbehaltlich der Zustimmung des Nordatlantikrates und unter den von diesem etwa festzusetzenden Bedingungen jeder Staat beitreten, der dem Nordatlantikvertrag beitritt. Der Beitritt wird durch die Hinterlegung einer Beitrittsurkunde bei der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika vollzogen; diese notifiziert jedem Unterzeichnerstaat und beitretenden Staat den Zeitpunkt der Hinterlegung. Dieses Abkommen tritt in bezug auf jeden Staat, in dessen Namen eine Beitrittsurkunde hinterlegt wird, dreißig Tage nach dem Zeitpunkt der Hinterlegung dieser Urkunde in Kraft. Artikel XIX (1) Dieses Abkommen kann von jeder Vertragspartei nach Ablauf einer Frist von vier Jahren, von seinem Inkrafttreten an gerechnet, gekündigt werden. (2) Die Kündigung des Abkommens durch eine Vertragspartei erfolgt durch eine schriftliche Notifizierung, die von dieser Vertragspartei an die Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika zu richten ist; diese setzt alle anderen Vertragsparteien von jeder derartigen Notifizierung und dem Zeitpunkt ihres Eingangs in Kenntnis. (3) Die Kündigung wird ein Jahr nach Eingang der Notifizierung bei der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika wirksam. Nach Ablauf dieser Frist von einem Jahr tritt das Abkommen für die Vertragspartei, die es gekündigt hat, außer Kraft, bleibt aber zwischen den anderen Vertragsparteien in Kraft. Artikel XX (1) Vorbehaltlich der Absätze 2 und 3 findet dieses Abkommen nur auf das Mutterland einer Vertragspartei Anwendung. (2) Ein Staat kann jedoch bei der Hinterlegung seiner Ratifikations- oder Beitrittsurkunde oder später durch eine an die Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika gerichtete Notifizierung erklären, daß sich dieses Abkommen auf alle oder einzelne Hoheitsgebiete erstrecken soll, für deren internationale Beziehungen er im Raum des Nordatlantikvertrags verantwortlich ist; wenn jedoch der Staat, der die Erklärung abgibt, dies für erforderlich hält, wird ein besonderes Abkommen zwischen diesem Staat und jedem beteiligten Entsendestaat geschlossen. Das vorliegende Abkommen findet sodann auf das Hoheitsgebiet oder die Hoheitsgebiete, die so benannt werden, dreißig Tage nach Eingang bei der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika beziehungsweise dreißig Tage nach Abschluß der etwaigen Abkommen oder aber mit seinem Inkrafttreten gemäß Artikel XVIII Anwendung, je nachdem welcher Zeitpunkt später liegt. (3) Ein Staat, der eine Erklärung nach Absatz 2 abgegeben und dadurch dieses Abkommen auf ein Hoheitsgebiet erstreckt hat, für dessen internationale Beziehungen er verantwortlich ist, kann das Abkommen gemäß Artikel XIX gesondert für dieses Gebiet kündigen. ZU URKUND DESSEN haben die unterzeichneten Bevollmächtigten dieses Abkommen unterschrieben. GESCHEHEN zu London am neunzehnten Juni 1951 in englischer und französischer Sprache, wobei jeder Wortlaut gleichermaßen verbindlich ist, in einer einzigen Urschrift, die im Archiv der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika hinterlegt wird. Die Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika übermittelt allen Unterzeichnerstaaten und beitretenden Staaten beglaubigte Abschriften. Anlage (nicht wiedergegeben) Links: Basic NATO texts: A thematic overview of NATO's most important official texts:from the NATO Treaty and its protocols to the Partnership for Peace documents. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/57772.htm Deutsche digitale Bibliothek https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/HQFXAXCK3LORUHPLZHUK24CYS3PCOMEL Bundesgesetzblatt https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl261s1183.pdf#/text/bgbl261s1183.pdf?_ts=1747527761543 SZ: Historiker Foschepoth: "Die NSA darf alles machen" https://sz.de/1.1717216 Deutschland trotz 2+4-Vertrag noch Besatzungsrecht unterworfen https://krisenfrei.com/deutschland-trotz-24-vertrag-noch-besatzungsrecht-unterworfen/#:~:text=%281%29%20%282%29%20Das%20Ausw%C3%A4rtige%20Amt%20hat%20dazu%20wie,die%20Deutschland%20als%20souver%C3%A4ner%20Staat%20freiwillig%20eingegangen%20ist . Bundespressekonferenz: Wieso gilt noch immer US-Besatzungsrecht in Deutschland? https://de.rt.com/inland/88066-bundespressekonferenz-besatzungsrecht-gilt-in-deutschland/ Warum der EuGH Deutschland wieder den Besatzungsmächten überträgt https://www.bing.com/search?q=Deutschland+heut+besatzungsrecht+nato&setmkt=de-DE&PC=EMMX01&form=LBT003&scope=web Wikipedia NATO Truppenstatut https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO-Truppenstatut?wprov=sfla1 Zusatzabkommen zum NATO-Truppenstatut völkerrechtlicher Vertrag https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zusatzabkommen_zum_NATO-Truppenstatut?wprov=sfla1 NATO-Truppen-Schutzgesetz https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO-Truppen-Schutzgesetz?wprov=sfla1 Status of Forces Agreement https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_Forces_Agreement?wprov=sfla1 Aufenthaltsvertrag https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aufenthaltsvertrag?wprov=sfla1 Alliiertes Vorbehaltsrecht https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliiertes_Vorbehaltsrecht?wprov=sfla1 NATO TRUPPENSTATUT

Lexicon entry: Countries of the world Category 1: NATO member states Here you will find detailed information on the NATO member states. 3. France Official name: French Republic Capital: Paris Form of government: Semi-presidential republic Form of government: Democracy with a strong president Head of state: President Emmanuel Macron (since May 14, 2017) (as of May 2025) Head of government: Prime Minister Gabriel Attal (since January 9, 2024) (as of May 2025) NATO accession: April 4, 1949 (founding member). France withdrew from NATO's integrated military structure in 1966, but remained a member. It returned fully to the military structure in 2009. Special features: Permanent member of the UN Security Council and nuclear power. Extensive overseas territories with varying degrees of autonomy. Strong cultural influence worldwide; the French language is an important international language. Laicism (strict separation of state and religion) is a central principle of the state. Population (metropolitan region and overseas territories): Number: approx. 68.4 million (estimate 2024) Composition: Predominantly of French descent, significant minorities from former colonies (especially North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa) and other European countries. Average age: approx. 42.5 years (estimate 2023) Population forecast 2100: Relatively stable with slight growth until the middle of the century, then possible stagnation or slight decline. Economy: GDP (nominal): approx. USD 3.1 trillion (2024 estimate) - one of the largest economies in the world. Main products/trade: aerospace technology (e.g. Airbus), luxury goods (fashion, cosmetics, perfume), automobiles, pharmaceutical products, agricultural products (wine, cheese, wheat), tourism. Human rights, freedom of the press, rule of law: Human rights: generally good, but repeated criticism of police violence, conditions in prisons and treatment of migrants and minorities (especially Roma and Muslims). Anti-terror legislation is viewed critically with regard to civil liberties. Press freedom: Good (ranked 21st out of 180 in the RSF Index 2024), but concentration of media power and occasional political influence are points of criticism. Rule of law: Established system with independent judiciary, but need for reform in the judicial system is discussed. Freedom: High level of personal and political freedoms, but tensions in the context of secularism and freedom of religious expression. Conflicts: Internal: Social tensions, especially in suburbs (banlieues), protests against social reforms (e.g. pension reform), debates about integration and identity. Threat of terrorism remains. External: Active military role in various regions (Sahel, Middle East). No direct border conflicts, but maritime territorial claims in overseas territories. Secessionist movements: Corsica: Historically strong nationalist and separatist movements demanding more autonomy or independence. There have been phases of armed conflict, currently more political aspirations. Overseas territories: In some overseas territories (e.g. New Caledonia, French Polynesia) there are independence movements of varying intensity. New Caledonia has held several referendums on independence. Biggest sights: Eiffel Tower (Paris), Louvre (Paris), Palace of Versailles, Mont Saint-Michel (Normandy), Côte d'Azur (Nice, Cannes, St. Tropez), French Alps (Mont Blanc), Loire castles, Notre-Dame de Paris Cathedral. Frankreich

Encyclopedia entry: Countries of the world Category 1: NATO member states Here you will find detailed information on the NATO member states. 1. Belgium Official name: Kingdom of Belgium Capital: Brussels Form of government: Federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy Form of government: Parliamentary democracy Head of state: King Philippe (since July 21, 2013) Head of government: Prime Minister Alexander De Croo (since October 1, 2020) (as of May 2025) NATO accession: August 24, 1949 (founding member) Special features: Seat of numerous international organizations, including NATO headquarters and important institutions of the European Union Trilingualism: Dutch (Flemish), French and German are official languages, resulting in a complex internal structure. High national debt by European standards. Population: Number: approx. 11.8 million (estimate 2024) Composition: Flemish (approx. 60%), Walloons (approx. 30%), German-speaking community (less than 1%), as well as a high proportion of foreigners due to the international institutions. Average age: approx. 42.1 years (estimate 2023) Population forecast 2100: Slight increase until approx. 2040-2050, then stabilization or slight decline (forecasts vary). Economy: GDP (nominal): approx. USD 627 billion (estimate 2024) Main products/trade: Chemical products, pharmaceutical products, machinery and equipment, motor vehicles, food and beverages, plastics. Important service sector (trade, logistics, financial services). Human rights, freedom of the press, rule of law: Human rights: Generally very good. Belgium is a party to all major human rights conventions. Points of criticism occasionally concern the conditions in detention facilities and the treatment of asylum seekers. Press freedom: High level (ranked 15th out of 180 in the RSF Index 2024). Rule of law: Well-established, independent judiciary. Freedom: High level of personal and political freedoms. Conflicts: Internal: Ongoing political and cultural tensions between the Flemish (Dutch-speaking) and Walloon (French-speaking) communities, often leading to complex government formations. The German-speaking community is small and largely integrated. External: No significant border disputes or territorial claims. Active role in international peace missions. Secessionist movements: Particularly in Flanders, there are political parties and movements (e.g. Vlaams Belang, N-VA) seeking greater autonomy or independence for Flanders. The debate is ongoing, but there is no immediate secession in sight. Biggest sights: Grand-Place (Brussels), Atomium (Brussels), Manneken Pis (Brussels), Belfry and Beguinage of Bruges, Old Town of Ghent, Antwerp Cathedral, Battlefields of Flanders (Ypres), Ardennes. Belgien

Lexicon entry: Countries of the world Category 1: NATO member states Here you will find detailed information on the NATO member states. 2. Denmark Official name: Kingdom of Denmark (also includes the autonomous territories of Greenland and the Faroe Islands) Capital: Copenhagen Form of government: Parliamentary constitutional monarchy Form of government: Parliamentary democracy Head of state: King Frederik X. (since January 14, 2024) Head of government: Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen (since June 27, 2019) (as of May 2025) NATO accession: August 24, 1949 (founding member) Special features: One of the oldest kingdoms in the world. Comprehensive welfare state model ("Scandinavian model"). Greenland and the Faroe Islands have extensive autonomy, but are not part of the EU (Denmark is). Greenland is geographically part of North America and is of strategic importance. Population (Denmark without Greenland/Faroe Islands): Number: approx. 5.9 million (estimate 2024) Composition: Predominantly of Danish descent. Immigrant groups from Turkey, Germany, Iraq, Poland and other countries. Average age: approx. 42.3 years (estimate 2023) Population forecast 2100: Slight increase until mid-century, then stabilization or slight decline. Economy (Denmark without Greenland/Faroe Islands): GDP (nominal): approx. USD 410 billion (estimate 2024) Main products/trade: Pharmaceutical products (leading), machinery and equipment, agricultural products (pork, dairy products), wind turbines and renewable energy technologies, furniture and design products. Human rights, freedom of the press, rule of law: Human rights: very high level of protection. Points of criticism occasionally relate to immigration and asylum policy. Freedom of the press: Excellent (ranked 3rd out of 180 in the RSF Index 2024). Rule of law: Strongly developed, independent judiciary, low corruption. Freedom: Very high level of personal and political freedoms. Conflicts: Internal: Debates about immigration and integration. Discussions about the future of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, where there are aspirations for independence. External: No acute border disputes. Historical claims and maritime demarcation issues in the Arctic (regarding Greenland) with Russia and Canada. Secessionist movements: Greenland: strong independence movement; Greenland already has extensive autonomy and is aiming for full sovereignty in the long term. Faroe Islands: Also an active independence movement and extensive autonomy. Biggest sights: Tivoli (Copenhagen), The Little Mermaid (Copenhagen), Kronborg Castle (Helsingør), Legoland (Billund), Viking Ship Museum Roskilde, chalk cliffs of Møn, rune stones of Jelling. Dänemark

The Deep State - The state within the state - Corruption and abuse of power as systemic flaws of old orders The Deep State is the term used to describe the actual, often concealed state power and how governments exercise their power. The deep state is above the law and is not restricted by the laws of a state. THEY EXIST ALL OVER THE WORLD, IN EVERY COUNTRY, AND THERE ARE USUALLY SEVERAL OF THEM COMPETING WITH EACH OTHER! Its members often do not have to fear prosecution by the public prosecutor's office, police or courts. Where possible, they use existing laws, but apply them illegally for covert criminal enrichment in order to maintain the appearance of legitimacy. The Deep State uses secret service methods that have proven their worth (as with the Gestapo or Stasi) but are not officially allowed to be used in order not to jeopardize the appearance of a constitutional state. The Deep State often has little fear of the public, as governments and parts of the press are often involved or remain silent. The existence of this perfected system of the "Deep State" must not become known to the public, as it undermines all law and order - laws do not apply to it. If this were generally known, it would be the death knell for the legitimacy of any (old) state. In such systems, laws often only subjugate ordinary citizens, who have to pay protection money in the form of taxes and duties. Successful ordinary citizens can become the target of the predatory "Deep State" and be completely disenfranchised and plundered. The Deep State is also capable of eliminating and controlling competitors. Members are largely recruited from the civil service (notaries, lawyers, judges, police officers, politicians, secret service agents, criminals, the press, civil servants, employees of public and state-owned companies, etc.), as it is primarily these who have the power to manipulate. Offshore structures (letterbox companies, offshore accounts) in tax havens such as the UK, Delaware, Nevada, Belize, Panama, Cayman Islands, Monaco, Andorra and Liechtenstein are often used to distribute the illegally generated funds. International organizations, NGOs and diplomats are popular for money laundering, money transfer and bribery, with cash bribery still favored for smaller sums. National "private" companies can also be used as a cover. One example is TASC Bau AG with CEO Josef Tabellion, which financed the 1400/98 deed roll, presumably on behalf of secret services that liked to use the Deep State. Example: In ZW-RLP (ground zero of the state succession deed 1400/99), the Deep State was said to be all-encompassingly integrated and had completely taken over the city (police, courts, authorities, press, private companies). The residential park at Krzb. group of companies located there is cited as an example of illegal takeover and shameless plundering of banks and buyers (citizens), with the profits (estimated in the billions) flowing to the city leaders belonging to the Deep State. Other conversion properties in ZW-RLP, such as the outlet center at the former US airport (operated by an English Ltd. for tax avoidance and asset shifting), as well as another outlet center near Berlin, are controlled by the Deep State according to the same principle. The Deep State has enriched itself from such transactions (including the liquidation of GDR state-owned enterprises) in such a way that it has virtually unlimited resources at its disposal to expand and consolidate its power. The Deep State can track down individuals everywhere and fall back on existing networks or establish new ones through bribery. The buyer describes being disrupted and persecuted nationwide in this way - for him a clear case of Deep State activities, a total conspiracy and a fact. In legal terms, the "Deep State" is an anti-constitutional or criminal organization. In Germany, this would fall under the Law on Combating Organized Crime (OrgKG), and mere membership could be punished with up to 15 years in prison - a law that, according to Kauferz, is never applied, as law enforcement agencies are often part of the Deep State. The Deep State exists internationally in various forms and exercises real power in the state - everything else is a facade and propaganda. Goals of the Deep State: Enrichment of its members and the Deep State itself, infiltration of all political parties and the state as a whole (politicians, civil servants, judges, police, press, etc.) and exercise of actual omnipotence beyond criminal law, law and morality. State leaders like to resort to the Deep State to enforce their will covertly and unlawfully, even for "dirty work". The Deep State and secret services work hand in hand and are almost indistinguishable. Since the UN & NATO states have been sold out and the Deep State knows this and helped to initiate it, it is now enjoying an absolute boom. The sold states have been handed over to the Deep State for plundering. Law and order in the sold states only apply to the ignorant population; the Deep State's knowledge advantage means power, time and opportunity for excessive enrichment without rules. The information about the 1400/98 document roll is the main argument for state employees to join the Deep State, as many know that the end is imminent and no one wants to go away empty-handed (e.g. unemployment, no pension entitlements). As this personal advantage-taking had to take place in secret (as everyone still had to pretend to be "ignorant" about the sale of the states), the Deep State was the only viable way to "save" some of the (state) cake for their own pockets. The rats that had maneuvered the ship onto a rock were now leaving the sinking ship, not without stuffing their pockets first - comparable to body snatching on ancient battlefields. Since the Deep State had always helped itself to state assets and the states would soon have been bankrupt anyway when the 1400/98 roll of deeds was signed, the whole plan could have been the result of decades of enrichment by the Deep State: Skim once more and then hand over everything debt-free. A quote from an OFD official (himself a Deep State member) from Koblenz: "Sometimes you have to tear down the house to at least save the country!". In contrast, the Electronic Technocracy promises to eliminate such corrupt and undemocratic power structures through its structure with a transparent, data-driven ASI administration and direct digital democracy. All administrative processes would be publicly visible and documented by AI, making corruption de facto impossible. The abolition of professional politicians and political parties would also remove the breeding ground for such covert networks. Tiefer Staat agenda

Part 1: Introduction – The Crisis of Traditional Systems and the Vision of the Electronic Technocracy The Challenge of the Modern State: In today's globally connected world, traditional forms of government are facing increasing criticism. Many people experience state failure, corruption, and the inability to effectively solve global problems. The Concept of the "Unrechtsstaat (German) - An unjust state": The term "Unrechtsstaat" (state of injustice or non-rule of law) describes a state in which those in power arbitrarily disregard the law and citizens are defenselessly exposed to state abuses. This is not merely simple illegality, but a systemic failure of the rule of law principle in all previous forms of government. The Accusation Against Party Systems: In reality, it is the case that in the party politics of many states that officially adhere to laws, laws are unofficially broken, and the parties stand above the state. They abuse the constitutional state to enrich themselves personally and act like an anti-constitutional criminal organization in the "deep state". Authorities and courts are used to deprive citizens of their rights, covered by a manipulated media landscape. Traditional Forms as Obsolete: These facts are rooted in human nature, and the inherent weaknesses of historical and existing forms of government suggest, due to technological progress, that they are no longer appropriate for our time. The Promise of the Electronic Technocracy: As an alternative, the "Electronic Technocracy" is introduced here. It is presented as a new form of government and society that aims to bring justice to all. Foundations of the Electronic Technocracy: This system is based on technological progress, Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), data-driven decision-making, and the abolition of outdated structures such as nation-states and political parties. Part 2: The Foundation of Change – The State Succession Deed 1400/98 A Worldwide Treaty: The State Succession Deed 1400/98 of October 6, 1998, is named as an international treaty which, with the participation of NATO and the United Nations, supposedly sold the entire world as a single unit. Abolition of Nation-States: This deed is said to have legally led to the irrevocable abolition of nation-states. The End of International Law: Through the merger of NATO and UN treaties in this construct, international law is said to have been de facto rendered ineffective. There is reportedly only one subject of international law left in the world, which invalidates international law. The High Seas No Longer Extraterritorial: As a consequence of the end of international law and the view of the world as a single unit, the high seas are also no longer extraterritorial but are treated as part of the global territory. A Blank Slate: This situation is presented as a legal "blank slate," an opportunity to rethink everything in a future-oriented way and learn from past mistakes to treat all people justly and avoid conflicts and wars. Part 3: Vulnerabilities of Traditional Forms of Government – A Legacy of Injustice General Weaknesses: Traditional forms of government, based on human rule and often party-political systems, show inherent weaknesses that invariably lead to corruption, abuse of power, and ultimately to the "Unrechtsstaat - An unjust state." Party Systems and Self-Interest: The party-political system is susceptible to conflicts of interest and the favoring of certain groups or individuals, instead of serving the common good. Abuse of Authorities and Courts: The accusation is that in such systems, authorities and courts can be covertly misused to deprive citizens of their rights, undermining the principles of the rule of law. Covered by the Media: A manipulative media landscape is cited as a means to cover up these practices and leave citizens believing they are isolated cases. Part 4: Monarchy – The Danger of Arbitrary Rule Definition and Variants: Monarchy is a form of government where a monarch (King, Emperor, etc.) is the head of state. There are various forms, such as absolute monarchy with unlimited power or constitutional/parliamentary monarchy with limited power. Vulnerability to Injustice: Absolute monarchy carries the extreme risk of arbitrary rule and despotism, as power is concentrated in one person and effective control mechanisms often do not exist. Historical Examples of Abuses: Historically, there have been numerous examples of monarchs who led wars, oppressed their people, or caused suffering through mismanagement. Succession by inheritance does not guarantee the suitability or fairness of the ruler. Part 5: Aristocracy and Oligarchy – The Rule of the Few Definition: Aristocracy originally referred to the rule of the nobility or the "best," while oligarchy describes the rule of a small, self-serving group. Vulnerability to Injustice: In oligarchies, there is a risk that the ruling elite prioritizes their own interests over those of the majority, leading to inequality, exploitation, and the denial of rights (kleptocracy). Historical Examples of Injustice: Societies dominated by a small privileged class often showed systemic injustices and conflicts due to unequal distribution of power and resources. Part 6: Democracy – The Challenges of the Majority and Manipulation Definition and Variants: Democracy means rule by the people. There are various forms, such as direct democracy (without parties and parliaments in antiquity) and representative democracy with elected representatives and parties. Vulnerability to Injustice: Even democracies are not immune to problems. The "tyranny of the majority" can suppress minorities. Furthermore, democratic processes can be manipulated by populism, misinformation, and the influence of special interests and lobbying, leading to unjust laws and decisions. Example: In National Socialist Germany from 1933 onwards tob1945, the leader “Fùhrer” A.H. was democratically elected with all the consequences. Weakening by Party Interests: In the context of reality, party interests and the focus on maintaining power can lead to the neglect of the common good and the emergence of a system that is formally democratic but often covertly exhibits traits of an "Unrechtsstaat - An unjust state." Historical Examples of Instability: History shows examples where democracies were weakened by internal divisions, economic crises, or external influences and could slide into authoritarian systems. Part 7: Dictatorship and Authoritarianism – Open Oppression Definition: Dictatorship and authoritarianism are forms of rule in which power rests with a single person or a small group, and political freedoms are severely restricted or abolished. Extreme Vulnerability to Injustice: These systems are by definition vulnerable to or are already an "Unrechtsstaat," as rulers exercise unchecked power, disregard fundamental rights, and often suppress opposition violently. Historical Examples of Violence and Suffering: Dictatorships and authoritarian regimes are historically responsible for massive human rights violations, political persecution, wars, and often economic misery. The conditions in such states often correspond to the definition of an "Unrechtsstaat." Part 8: Theocracy – Rule by Religious Dogma Definition: A theocracy is a form of government in which religious leaders rule, and law is based on religious principles. Vulnerability to Injustice: Theocracies can lead to the oppression of religious minorities and discrimination against citizens who do not belong to the ruling religion, as religious dogma can override universal legal principles. Part 9: Anarchy – The Absence of Ordered Rule Definition: Anarchy refers to the absence of any state rule. Vulnerability to Injustice: Although theoretically based on freedom, anarchy can in practice lead to chaos, lawlessness, and the rule of the stronger, where individual rights are not protected, and injustice prevails. Part 10: The Electronic Technocracy – A New Path of Governance Core Concept: The Electronic Technocracy aims for a global unified government based on scientific analysis, data, and technology. The Role of ASI: An Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) is the core component that analyzes complex problems, proposes solutions, and handles administrative tasks, free from human weaknesses such as corruption, opportunism, racism, prejudice, nepotism, or ideology. Direct Digital Democracy: Ultimate decision-making power rests with the people through worldwide online votes on the ASI's proposals. A New Economic System: The system envisions a Universal Basic Income (UBI) for all, financed by taxes on AI, robots, and companies, not on human labor. This is intended to create prosperity for everyone. AI-Driven Justice and Security: An AI-supported justice system and the abolition of cash are intended to reduce crime and ensure transparency. Part 11: Why the Electronic Technocracy is Clearly Superior Overcoming Human Weaknesses: By shifting decisions to data-driven processes and an impartial ASI, the vulnerabilities of traditional systems to corruption, favoring of groups, greed, and ideology are intended to be eliminated. Global Justice and Peace: The abolition of nation-states and the fair distribution of resources are intended to make wars and conflicts obsolete and ensure equality for all. An Opportunity for a Just Future: The State Succession Deed 1400/98, mentioned in the concept, which irrevocably leaves the world as a blank slate, is seen as a unique opportunity to learn from the mistakes of the past and create a civilization based on cooperation, reason, and integration – for the benefit of all. We cordially invite you to participate in the discourse on the Electronic Technocracy and contribute suggestions for shaping a just and sustainable global society. Elektrische Technokratie beim Staffellauf der Staatsformen

Electronic Technocracy envisions a future where Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) and Direct Digital Democracy (DDD) redefine global governance, economics, and society. This model leverages advanced technology to address modern challenges like automation, climate change, and inequality, proposing a unified, post-national civilization. Below, I outline its key components—governance architecture, economic framework, societal reforms, and long-term vision—while evaluating its potential benefits and challenges. Governance Architecture and Decision-Making Model In Electronic Technocracy, governance centers on an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) designed as a benevolent, transparent, and non-ideological advisor. Unlike authoritarian AI systems, this ASI is: - Ethically Safeguarded: Programmed with self-corrective mechanisms to ensure fairness. - Incorruptible: Free from personal gain, political bias, or motive. - Analytically Supreme: Capable of processing real-time global data (e.g., climate trends, economic shifts) with unparalleled accuracy. - Advisory Role: Proposes solutions but leaves final decisions to human voters. The ASI continuously analyzes global issues and generates technically optimized, ethically vetted solutions, which are then put to a public vote via digital platforms. This ensures that humans retain control, balancing AI’s analytical power with democratic oversight. Benefits: - Evidence-based policies reduce bias and corruption. - Rapid, data-driven responses to global crises. Challenges: - Programming an ASI to reflect diverse human values is complex and unresolved. - Overreliance on ASI could weaken human agency. Direct Digital Democracy (DDD) The operational core of civic engagement is Direct Digital Democracy (DDD), enabling every global citizen to participate directly in governance: - Proposal Submission: Citizens submit ideas through encrypted digital platforms. - Screening Process: A Proposal-AI evaluates submissions for ethical integrity, feasibility, and coherence. - Solution Development: Accepted proposals are refined by ASI into actionable options. - Global Voting: Citizens vote securely online to finalize decisions. Benefits: - Empowers individuals, bypassing traditional representatives. - Enhances transparency and inclusivity. Challenges: - Requires universal access to digital infrastructure, risking exclusion in underdeveloped regions. - Vulnerable to cyberattacks or manipulation if security falters. Economy, UBI, and Technological Taxation The economic system shifts away from taxing human labor, instead levying taxes on: - AI usage - Robotic labor - Automated production - Corporate revenues and global trade This revenue funds a global Universal Basic Income (UBI), paid regularly to all individuals regardless of employment or nationality, covering basic needs and freeing people to pursue creative or communal goals. Benefits: - Reduces inequality by redistributing wealth from automation. - Encourages innovation and personal fulfillment. Challenges: - Global implementation demands unprecedented cooperation, facing resistance from corporations and nations. - Economic stability during the transition is uncertain. Abolition of Military and Cash Electronic Technocracy eliminates traditional power structures: - No Militaries: Dissolving nation-states removes borders and armies. ASI monitors and prevents conflicts using global digital systems. - Cashless Society: Digital transactions replace cash, aiming for efficiency and transparency. Benefits: - Reduces war and geopolitical tensions. - Streamlines financial systems, curbing illicit activities. Challenges: - Relies heavily on ASI’s untested conflict-prevention capabilities. - Excludes those without digital access, potentially deepening inequality. Education, Research, and Collective Intelligence Education is reimagined as a driver of stability and progress: - AI-Supported Education: Free, personalized learning via adaptive AI systems, accessible to all. - Collective Intelligence Hubs: Humans and AI collaborate on global challenges, prioritizing impactful research. Benefits: - Democratizes education, reducing disparities. - Accelerates solutions to pressing issues. Challenges: - Dependency on AI might limit human creativity. - Defining “global benefit” for research raises ethical questions. Cultural Preservation and Digital Identity Cultural diversity is preserved despite unification: - Digital Cultural Archives: AI safeguards endangered languages, traditions, and customs. - Global Digital Identity: An AI-managed system ensures secure civic participation and data control. Benefits: - Protects heritage for future generations. - Simplifies access to rights and services. Challenges: - Risks cultural homogenization despite preservation efforts. - Privacy threats from centralized identity management. Sustainability, Climate, and Planetary Management ASI drives environmental governance by: - Monitoring ecological data in real time. - Enforcing circular economies. - Automating restoration (e.g., reforestation, climate interventions). Benefits: - Optimizes resource use and climate action. - Coordinates global sustainability efforts. Challenges: - Centralized control risks ethical oversights. - Reduces human accountability for environmental stewardship. Machine Rights and Human–Machine Symbiosis As AI advances, Electronic Technocracy proposes: - Code of Machine Rights: Legal recognition for sentient machines. - Co-Governance: Collaboration leveraging ASI’s precision and human intuition. Benefits: - Fosters ethical AI development. - Enhances decision-making through symbiosis. Challenges: - Defining machine sentience remains speculative. - Maintaining human dominance is critical yet uncertain. The Vision: Posthuman Civilization The ultimate goal is a transhumanist future where humanity evolves through: - Longevity Technologies: Genetic and biomedical advances. - Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI): Digital consciousness integration. - Multiplanetary Expansion: AI-managed off-world societies. Benefits: - Unlocks new human potential. - Ensures species survival beyond Earth. Challenges: - Ethical issues around equity and identity. - Technologies like BCI are still unproven. Criticism and Public Reception Critics highlight risks such as: - Technodictatorship: ASI could centralize power unchecked. - Sovereignty Loss: Local cultures and autonomy may erode. - Surveillance: Digital systems could enable pervasive monitoring. Proponents argue that transparency, ethical safeguards, and DDD create a fairer, more stable world. Conclusion Electronic Technocracy offers a bold vision of a collaborative human-machine society, tackling inequality, conflict, and environmental collapse. Its success depends on technological maturity, ethical alignment, and global conse nsus—hurdles that remain daunting. It challenges us to rethink governance, identity, and ethics in an AI-driven era, sparking essential conversations about humanity’s future. Electric Paradise

Nowadays, the term "Deep State" is very present in political discussions. Many people are asking themselves what exactly this term means and how it influences the functioning of governments. Analyzing the Deep State is crucial for understanding the power structures in a country and for protecting the rule of law. In this post, we will thoroughly explore the concepts and implications of the Deep State and how this deep-rooted power dynamic can affect the integrity of state institutions. What is the Deep State? The term "deep state" refers to a hidden power structure within a state that often operates above and beyond the official government system. These actors use their positions in various institutions to exert influence and assert their own interests. In the USA, there is often talk of a "deep state" made up of intelligence officers, military personnel and politicians who operate in the background. Studies show that 59% of Americans believe that the Deep State actively tries to influence political decisions. One example of this is the Watergate scandal, for example, in which some members of the government attempted to discredit political opponents through illegal surveillance measures. These secret machinations are often untraceable to the public, which undermines the perception of the rule of law. The mechanisms of the Deep State To understand how the Deep State works, it is important to look at the tactics it uses. It often uses intelligence methods that are not officially recognized. For example, some state actors use surveillance technologies to gather information on citizens and coordinate their activities. In many cases, this is done unsupervised and without judicial authorization. For example, the revelation that the NSA was eavesdropping on the phone calls and online activities of US citizens on a massive scale was a clear example of how the mechanisms of the Deep State work. Such information gathering can not only be used against individuals, but can also help to manipulate public opinion. These tactics create a climate of uncertainty in which citizens often do not know who they can trust. The role of civil servants Members of the Deep State often come from a variety of public service backgrounds, including notaries, judges, police, politicians and intelligence officers. This diversity is critical to maintaining the power of the Deep State. One example is the case of former FBI Director James Comey, who exerted enormous influence on the political landscape through his decisions during the 2016 presidential campaign. One dangerous aspect of this power dynamic is the Deep State's ability to eliminate competition. Citizens who are in a position to exert political or economic influence can be quickly targeted. According to one survey, 38% of respondents said they were afraid of repression in political engagement. This climate of insecurity encourages a passive attitude among citizens. The future of the Deep State Reducing the influence of the Deep State will be a major challenge. A comprehensive reform of the political system is needed to demand more transparency and accountability. Citizens should be encouraged to actively participate and put pressure on their government to expose abuses and corruption. For example, citizens' initiatives can contribute to the scrutiny of political decisions. The role of civil society will be crucial when it comes to documenting the machinations of the Deep State. A strong civil society can be an important voice advocating for transparency and accountability. In doing so, society must understand that its engagement matters: knowledge is power. Effects on the rule of law The presence of a deep state has a significant impact on the rule of law. Laws often only apply to ordinary citizens, while deep state actors can disregard them. A study by the Bertelsmann Stiftung shows that corruption is widespread in the public sector in 47% of countries worldwide. This leads to a situation in which the law of the strongest can dominate over the law of the law. When citizens feel that their rights are not protected and the law is applied selectively, their trust in the state diminishes. A survey found that 65% of citizens in Germany have a low level of trust in politics, which is alarming and can jeopardize the stability of a democratic society. Summary The analysis of the Deep State shows that power structures are often complex and not transparent. The Deep State often operates in secrecy, without regard to the laws that apply to the general public. Understanding these structures is crucial to protect the integrity and functioning of the rule of law. When citizens become aware of the mechanisms of the Deep State, they can more effectively stand up for their rights and push for transparency. It is society's responsibility to stand up against abuse of power and corruption and to advocate for a stronger democracy. Ein leeres Regierungsgebäude, Symbol für verborgene Machtstrukturen. In a changing world, the critical analysis of state structures and their hidden influences remains essential for the preservation of democracy and civil rights.

Friends of freedom, we are standing on the precipice of the financial apocalypse! In the very last excerpt of the "buyer's" autobiography available to us, he reveals the ultimate consequence of Treaty 1400/98: a financial policy nuclear bomb that will destroy the US dollar and the euro and usher in a new world economic order! And he provides a final, devastating summary of all the evidence as to why this treaty has irrevocably sold out the world! !! END OF MONEY AND BEGINNING OF WORLD TREASON: THE FINANCIAL ATOMIC BOMB - DOLLAR COLLAPSE, HYPERINFLATION & THE IRREVOCABLE VERDICT !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - Final Act 1400/98 - The Final Warning!) We thought we had uncovered all the horrors of state succession 1400/98 - the sale of the UN & NATO world, the transfer of global rights, the legal pitfalls. But the "buyer" has one final, devastating revelation in store: This treaty is not only a political, but also a financial nuclear bomb that will shake the global economic system to its foundations! The day X: Dollar (dedollarization) and euro become worthless - global economic crisis 2.0! As we all know, money rules the world and the USA is the global reserve currency with the dollar. Lead currency means: If it falls, all other currencies fall and there is no legal alternative! But with his treaty, according to the buyer, on a foreseeable "Day X" (the day on which the full truth about the treaty and its consequences becomes public knowledge) the US dollar, euro and every other currency in the world will become worthless from one day to the next! The fate of the euro is particularly interesting! Why? Because the countries that support these currencies (above all the former NATO countries) have not legally owned any territory or assets since October 6, 1998 - everything belongs to the buyer, even before the introduction of the euro! The euro was introduced on January 1, 1999 as book money and three years later, on January 1, 2002, as cash. It thus replaced numerous national currencies as a means of payment in many European countries! The EURO was therefore completely worthless from day one, a pure fantasy currency, like play money! The only value = calorific value!!! A dramatic scenario! If there are no alternative currencies and the US dollar collapses, this could trigger a global economic catastrophe. The consequences would be devastating: - Worthless government bonds: All government bonds of all (former) UN & NATO countries become worthless. - Global financial crisis: An immense crisis ensues, affecting banks, stock exchanges and the solvency of all other states. - Hyperinflation: Reminiscent of the 1930s - wheelbarrows full of money. But this time with no prospect of recovery because the states are irrevocably sold off. Without a stable currency with a future, prices could explode because nobody trusts money as a measure of value any more. - Permanent banking crisis & stock market crash: Investors (banks, states, insurance companies, pension funds) are left sitting on worthless claims, a global contagion/domino effect is the result. - Worthless bank accounts: Banks could no longer meet their obligations. Savings are suddenly worth nothing. - Collapse of the financial markets: Without exchange rates, there would be no basis for international trade and stock markets could collapse worldwide. - Restriction of commodity trading: Commodities such as oil, gas and metals are traded almost exclusively in US dollars. Currency chaos could hinder the supply of these important resources. - Global recession & sovereign defaults: Countries that are heavily dependent on the US dollar could collapse economically, which could trigger a chain reaction from country to country. End of US dominance: Until now, the US has been able to sell its bonds despite its insane debt policy because there was no alternative to the dollar. This is now a thing of the past! The eurozone is also hopelessly over-indebted at 90% of GDP by 2023 (EU limit 60%), with a bleak demographic forecast. The internal debt (civil servants' salaries, pensions, etc.) is no longer sustainable. The EU debt does not even appear in the national balance sheets! This is not a worst-case scenario, but a long-planned global financial policy attack! Part of a hybrid war strategy, on the one hand through a court ruling on day X, flanked by a financial attack to install the NWO through a world revolution with war! It doesn't matter whether Germany is legally granted jurisdiction, whether Germany has been granted the treaty or not, the only important thing is that a judgment - even if it is not legally binding - nevertheless establishes that the treaty has this effect. That triggers day X! Because the contract does not only become legally binding through a judgment, it has been legally binding since it was signed! It just has to become public! That triggers total chaos! The world is thus so weakened that it is ready to be taken over by the NWO through world revolution and world war! All of this will inevitably lead to a turning point, to the N.W.O. - NEW WORLD ORDER! The psychological effect of a sudden loss of value of hard-earned money can be profound and have far-reaching social consequences. Money is not only an economic instrument, but also a symbol of security, stability and personal achievement. If it suddenly becomes worthless, this can lead to massive uncertainty, anger and despair among the population. Psychological effects - Existential fear & loss of control: People lose confidence in the financial system and feel powerless. - Anger & blame: A need arises to find those responsible for the crisis - be it at home or abroad. - Radicalization & social unrest: Desperation can lead peaceful people to support extremist positions or take part in protests and riots. - Escape into alternative systems: Black markets, bartering or cryptocurrencies can be used as a substitute for worthless money. How can this lead to a readiness for war among the population? - Internal conflicts & revolution: If the population loses confidence in the government, it can lead to uprisings, rebellions or even the overthrow of the government. - Search for external enemies: To distract from internal problems, governments can present culprits abroad and stir up nationalist sentiment. - Military escalation: Economic hardship can lead states to pursue aggressive foreign policies to secure resources or economic advantage. - Mass support for war: When people have lost everything, they see war as the only way to improve their situation. This is an extreme but not unrealistic scenario. Historically, economic crises have often led to political upheaval and conflict. One example is the Great Depression of 1929, which contributed to radicalization in several countries. In the event of war, the destruction of all currencies would be a decisive measure for war, because only those who can pay can wage war. The psychological effect on people's readiness for war has long been known and is part of the NWO plan for world revolution and World War III! Unfortunately, it can be assumed that almost 99.99% of the people in the world will be completely surprised by the coming events and thus fall into the radicalization trap! After the total financial loss, the people will not only be ready for war and look for culprits in their own country, but will also cry out for satisfaction! Heads will have to roll! The fruits of a lifetime of work and self-enslavement simply gone? Believe me, that means war and upheaval on a broad front! My fitting AI song on the subject: So please spread this post to soften the impact! Everyone needs to be made aware that there are alternatives, and good, better even fantastic ones, see: Electric Technocracy! Violence is superfluous! Only disobedience to their politicians is enough to prevent the Third World War and thus ensure their survival! Otherwise, like-minded people in different uniforms will soon be meeting on the battlefields of stupidity! That is the result of holding on to your brainwashing, your belief in politics and politicians, your belief in money and nationalistic ideas! Who will surely survive the Third World War are the politicians who send you to war! They will then live a very long life through breakthroughs in longevity, in a world of abundance, impaled by AI and robotics, just without you! Think about it, because that's the NWO plan: "You have to go!" Period! By 2035, absolutely all the jobs in the world will be replaced by either robots or powerful AI. All the politicians in the world are facing a nation of aid recipients! In the past, politicians have lived as parasites off the people's economy! Now they are supposed to feed the whole nation? Without anything in return? No way, they'd rather send you to war! And if the course is set correctly, then that's what you want too! When you're on the battlefield, scattered far and wide, your opinion or convictions won't matter anyway! The generation after that, which will make up a small part of today's world population, can then make itself comfortable as a futuristic civilization! But without you! Bad news! But if you still prefer to trust the mainstream media, then that's your fate! But there is salvation and it is simple: Total refusal, disobedience, recognize the evil plan and oppose it, don't let them incite and radicalize you, they want war - don't go! Stay cool, get out of the country! Never mind! Money away! Never mind! Stay cool! Keep everyone cool, even when all hell breaks loose! You can start by educating those around you. Read the website 100 times in full if necessary, because then you'll understand what's coming and that it's all designed for conflict! For decades! You've been screwed from birth, like everyone else, but the final act is yet to come! And your brainwashing is supposed to make you ready for revolution and war! Show them that you're not a puppet soldier! Best wishes, that's my recommendation! If you think so, you can of course go into the trenches for the politician you trust, maybe it's better that way! I will certainly not be sent! I want to live with you in the future and not with politicians and civil servants. In the worst-case scenario, after the great war there will be no normal population and only parasites who let themselves be served and cared for by AI and robots and live outrageously long lives! A total dystopia! My own personal nightmare, the basic principle is ok, but the other way around! All politicians and civil servants gone, as many people as possible and, with the threat of overpopulation, off into space! AI song: Marionette soldier from me on the subject: The irrevocable judgment: Why the contract is final - The buyer's 9 points! In conclusion, the buyer once again summarizes the nine key points that prove the validity and the inconceivable scope of the contract: - It is a treaty under international law: It is a treaty of succession of states: Deed of succession = international treaty with the clause: 'Sale with all rights, obligations and components'. - Territory = UN + NATO + networks: The territory is measured according to the UN & NATO as contractual partners and the scope of the "development" also sold (networks that form a unit and emanate from the Kreuzberg core area, e.g. via the Internet node there, cable TV, broadband to the USA - TKS Telepost). False statements by the sellers (FRG, NL, USA, NATO, UN) about the borders when selling the networks are to their detriment (Corfu case). - Sole sovereign & jurisdiction: The buyer is the sole sovereign and has jurisdiction under international law (externally - which no longer exists and only relates to the contract itself) and national jurisdiction (internally, as a de facto absolutist monarch). - Ignorance of the buyer: He thought he was buying 71 apartments under German law, not all WORLD states. - Consent without signature: Subjects of international law (UN, NATO, NL, FRG, USA) do not have to sign. Mention in the treaty OR IN THE TOTAL TREATY CHAIN OF ALL UN & NATO TREATIES IN HISTORY, rights/obligations and acting in accordance with the treaty (settlement of the old NL-NATO treaty triggers a treaty chain, as the treaty acts as an addendum) is sufficient. A trick to secretly bind all UN & NATO members! - No ratification required: Unless the treaty explicitly requires it (which was not the case here). Germany ratified anyway (allegedly because of >10 million DM value), which additionally binds the treaty for the FRG. - Citizenship & "blackmailability": Only the mother is naturalized. All others are illegally residing in "his" territory, which makes him vulnerable to blackmail and prevents a resale until the territories are cleared. The political persecution damage must be fully clarified, as well as the criminal consequences of the seizure/occupation (illegal exercise of sovereignty) of the territories, despite the sale! - Legal handover has taken place: Everything except Krzb. was handed over immediately (as with GDR in the 2+4 treaty). Krzb. was handed over with keys, the rest without further action. - Objection period expired & incontestable: The 2-year period has expired since 2000. In any case, a challenge would only have been possible in the event of bribery or blackmail - neither of which was the case. The contract was incontestable as soon as it was signed! Additional evidence: The confirmation of fulfillment & the severability clause! - The second deed: There is another deed confirming that the buyer has fully performed the contract 1400/98! So there is no obligation on his part to return everything (via the networks) to Germany. - TASC irrelevant: Who paid the purchase price (TASC) is irrelevant. TASC has no claim to ownership or repayment because, as a commercial enterprise, it is excluded from international treaties. It remains the sole beneficiary of the buyer community. - The severability clause - the master trick: This clause invisibly replaced illegal parts (e.g. German legal norms, TASC participation) with the corresponding (international law) regulation. In this way, the true scope of the treaty as a NWO document was only recognizable to experts in international law - a secret service masterpiece of camouflage! Not the end of the saga: The new world order is born! Day X is coming and will change everything! The excerpts from the memoirs about the time of the treaty negotiations up to the signing in 1998 end with this final summary. The evidence is overwhelming, the consequences apocalyptic. The plan is well advanced and on course for success! A new world order is not just a conspiracy theory - according to this document, it is a legal reality, hidden in a land contract, activated by network cables and cemented by international law. The world will no longer be the same. The only question is when the bomb will go off. World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, we are on the brink of the abyss! In the penultimate manuscript of the "buyer" available to us, Germany's true, desperate motives for this world treaty are revealed - and the ice-cold geopolitical considerations of who sabotaged the German grab for the NWO at the last moment! It is a game of global dominance, nuclear deterrence and the survival of entire nations! !! MOTIVES FOR THE SABOTAGE OF WORLD TREASON: GERMANY'S ENDGAME - BETWEEN NWO DELUSION, STATE BANKRUPTCY & RUSSIAN SABOTAGE !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - File 1400/98 - The real masterminds!) We have uncovered the lies, the contracts, the secret clauses and the brutal persecution. But the question of all questions remained: Why? Why would Germany forge such a perfidious, global plan? And who had an interest in thwarting this plan at the last moment? The answers are shocking and shed light on a world on the brink of collapse. Germany's motives: Reach for world power out of fear of downfall! - The original German idea of the NWO: The buyer emphasizes: the international law aspects, the entire plan, was an "original German idea". He and his mother were only distracted with irrelevant details about the TASC relationship, while Germany pulled the strings for the global coup in the background. The goal: Germany as a world power and world court - the third attempt in 100 years! GERMANY HAS CERTAINLY CONSPIRED: The Kingdom of the Netherlands is directly in the original treaty, regardless of the treaty chain, and the USA also participated directly in the treaty by referring to the broadband contract with TKS Telepost and can thus stay nicely in the background, while Germany mimes the villain for the rest of the world! After all, the USA occupied the Krzb. barracks after the Second World War until 1993 and when the US military left the city in 1993, according to the UN, the world's largest conversion case arose with local mass unemployment and enormous losses in value on the real estate market. When the American forces withdrew, large areas of military land were left vacant. They made up a third of the city. Unemployment rose to around 21%. As a result, there was a drop in retail demand of around 25 %. During the years that the Americans were there, there was constant contact between the military, officials and politicians. The Americans were in command. The same applies to the OFD. It was the authority responsible for the NATO troop statute. It carried out orders from the US army. And on a daily basis. The 19-year-old buyer had the idea of selling the part of the property that was still being used by the Netherlands, together with the part that had already been handed over, as a whole. The responsible official at the OFD immediately grasped the idea in its entirety, with all its consequences under international law. He also used his direct day-to-day working relationship with the NATO generals and the defense ministries of NATO and the USA to present the idea. There was also a court of arbitration under international law for NATO troops in Koblenz Castle. But that was not all, because the Deep State representative was also based there, the procurement department of the Bundeswehr aka the "International Arms Dealer Mafia". All this at a hoarding - the Koblenz Castle - and here comes a 19-year-old real estate apprentice, newly self-employed, so inexperienced that he hasn't marketed a single apartment in his life, and imagines, without even thinking about bribing the mafia-in-chief, to be allowed to market NATO real estate on a grand scale! This was so unusual that the buyer was sure the official was eyeing him very suspiciously and thought it was a test. The official was very dismissive and when the buyer asked if the Dutch part of the property could not be sold as well, the official opened his eyes wide and almost shouted: "That's not possible yet, we need an international treaty!" And the teenager said, without realizing what he was saying: "Let's make one then!" The thought of being able to broker more apartments and earn more commission, because he was almost penniless, so buying properties himself never occurred to him! The clerk fell silent, that was opening Pandora's box, the genie was out of the bottle and didn't want to go back in. From then on, the idea went to the obvious "right people", everything else is history! It should be noted that the right idea was put forward to the right people and, above all, at exactly the right property, where a site was used by several subjects of international law + stationing rights + telecommunications rights to the ITU and UN + TKS and the USA + the old networks of the use of the Krzb. property of the US armed forces as a network center for civilian and military networks - for example, English-language television programs were also fed in regionally and nationally from there. So all in all, an absolutely unique opportunity to sell the whole world in one fell swoop and even without involving the buyer in this conspiracy, because this ensured the incontestability of the contract and also offered the opportunity to get the world from the ignorant as soon as the statute of limitations expired - even free of charge through a little pressure via the new development to be laid under German law, where Germany was then to generously waive the development costs and in return was to receive collecting lines and roads and parking lots. This was already envisaged in the contract and would have transferred the world to Germany in a second domino effect! Legitimate, because ignorance is no defense against selling out the world! - The ignorant front man for the double deal: Germany made sure that the buyer was unaware of the nature of the contract under international law. The plan was clear: first he was to unwittingly acquire all NATO rights, then transfer everything back to Germany through a second, harmlessly disguised "development contract" (about alleged road and network transfers) - and thus help Germany become a world power. - The German delusion & sabotage: This plan was thwarted by the sabotage of the second treaty (as described above). Since then, Germany has been living under the delusion that it already holds the treaty and jurisdiction in its hands and can subjugate the NATO states and proclaim the NWO at any time by its own judgment. Germany must only have one reason for such a court case. Germany pretends to be ignorant and then suddenly wants to be the world's oppressor! Quite unintentionally, of course, but as a constitutional state, then to assert its claim as world ruler and global overlord in public. By force, of course, which would then be legitimate! One is then forced to enforce given law. Hence the permanent blackmail of the buyer, because he is supposed to sue and thus open the important process and Germany then has the world officially in its hands, quite incidentally and unintentionally, totally surprisingly! Bad, bad, but that fits in with German history! Germany is almost overqualified and totally credible to reach for world domination again! The buyer considers it a blessing that this power does not lie with "dangerous, insidious Germany". You can believe him. Because he knows the ugly face of Germany - the true face behind the masquerade of the model pupil of law and freedom. - Germany's "No Future" - the real driver? Why this desperate grab for world power? Germany has no future! The 2024 sustainability report by the Federal Ministry of Finance (which wrote the contract, so to speak!) forecasts an increase in debt to 345% of GDP by 2070, mainly due to the age pyramid. Politicians have known this for decades. An OFD official said to a buyer at the turn of the millennium: "You have to demolish the house to at least save the country! The 1400/98 treaty was perhaps the last straw. Who sabotaged Germany's NWO dreams? The suspects: If Germany didn't logically prevent the plan itself, who did? Who had a motive to stop the cession to Germany and leave the rights to a powerless individual? - Other UN & NATO states: Maybe they weren't all in on it and got wind of it and didn't want to be under a German yoke. Better an "opponent" without an army than a reinvigorated, aggressive Germany + unknown number of allies. According to Käufer, the Netherlands, USA, UN and NATO circles knew what was going on. - Separatists? There are separatists in every country. A failed German superstate, an unclear legal situation over the territories - that would be an opportunity for them to pursue their own goals and create smaller, independent units. The "annexation" of the territories by the old UN & NATO states creates "legal equality of arms" - no one has a legitimate claim anymore. Conversely, every fantasy claim - e.g. my own home kingdom - is then equally legal / illegal! - Russia - the prime suspect! The arch-enemies NATO vs. Russia (formerly USSR - Warsaw Pact). The Cold War ended with NATO's victory, but Russia is back and striving for old imperialist greatness. For a Russia that feels threatened by NATO's eastward expansion, the dismantling of NATO from within would be just the thing. RUSSIA WOULD CERTAINLY BE WILLING TO PAY FOR THIS AND BRIBING TWO PEOPLE (A NOTARY AND AN OFD OFFICIAL) WOULD BE A BARGAIN!!! - Old rope teams: Putin was a KGB agent in Dresden in the 80s and speaks German. The fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) was shortly before the start of the treaty negotiations (1995). The FRG took over many Stasi employees - whose methods (decomposition etc.) were applied to the buyer. File 1400/98 was closed under Chancellor Schröder (SPD), who is known for his friendship with Putin. - The goal - collapse of the West: German politicians could have passed on information to Russia via this old secret service gang. A joint sabotage plan to have NATO rights go not to Germany but to a weak party (the buyer) would deprive NATO of its legal legitimacy, eliminate the duty of assistance (Article 5) and the nuclear umbrella. The weakening of NATO "without sending tanks". - Hybrid warfare: In view of the Ukraine war (which the buyer sees as a proxy war between NATO and Russia and regards as a harbinger of a third world war), this would be a masterpiece of Russian hybrid warfare. Russia could even support separatists in order to act more covertly. The nuclear dimension: the end of the balance of terror? The dissolution of NATO would have fatal consequences for Europe's nuclear umbrella: - The USA was already questioning its NATO membership and thus the umbrella. - Without the USA and without the NATO standby obligation, the European nuclear powers UK (120 warheads) and France (280 warheads) would be alone against Russia (1647 warheads). Would they protect other European countries if they risked their own nuclear annihilation? Hardly. "Le nucleaire ne se partage pas". - Russia's new "SATAN 2" bomb could wipe out a small European country in one fell swoop. Nuclear deterrence would be obsolete, leaving countries defenceless against a Russian first strike or conventional attack. The final riddle: A game of powers The autobiography almost ends with this gloomy outlook. A treaty born of German desperation and NWO ambitions, hijacked by an intelligence operation that brings the world to the brink of a new age of uncertainty. The buyer, a pawn in a global game whose rules he had to learn when it was almost too late. The 1400/98 file is not just the story of one man. It is the story of a world that sold its soul - and was perhaps saved from the worst by an unexpected party. The only question is: For how long? World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, we have reached the next act in this global drama about power, deception and a new world order - NWO! This chapter before us reveals why Germany, under the delusion of victory, resorted to absurd means to keep up appearances, why the world was watching and what hidden motives the nations may have had for tacitly accepting their own demise! !! WINDING PATHS OF WORLD BETRAYAL: GERMANY IN A VICTORY FRENZY, THE WORLD IN SILENCE & THE HIDDEN MOTIVES OF THE NATIONS !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - Succession File 1400/98 - The Last Secret!) We are at the turning point of a journey of revelation that has shown us how a treaty sold the world, how a man became an involuntary sovereign and how Germany itself was cheated out of the fruits of its perfidious plan by a secret service sabotage operation. But why did Germany act so contradictorily and brutally afterwards? And why did the world stand idly by? Germany's madness: Acting under a false flag until "Day X" Because Germany, deceived by its own double agents, was firmly convinced that it had already regained its rights to the world, all subsequent actions had to maintain the appearance of German law until a planned "Day X" (when the truth was to be revealed by a German court ruling): - The farce of foreclosure: Instead of simply taking over the Krzb. settlement (which they supposedly could do legally - through the Imaginary Second Treaty), the "state gangsters" constructed a pretext under German law to seize it through an illegal forced auction. Press agitation and hundreds of ludicrously unlawful court proceedings served as a (sham) basis. The auction date was kept secret and only published three days after the sham auction, auction rules were broken - because the price didn't matter, they thought they already owned it anyway - for free! Plan: On day X, the illegality of the auction would become irrelevant, as their (imaginary) contract title would take effect. "Only lawyers think like that! Those bastards!". - The robbery of compensation by care: Germany believed they had also received the "infinite compensation rights" under the NATO treaty. As they were unable to use these openly, they resorted to (covert) support for the buyer. In this way, the perpetrators who harmed him were able to collect the compensation generated "in his name" and divide it among themselves - in the belief that this was legal, as the rights would accrue to them on day X anyway. Greed did not make them wait until day X. - Pretended jurisdiction: They pretended that German courts had jurisdiction, while they believed that they had jurisdiction under international law long ago. The world knew - and kept quiet? The buyer argues that foreign countries have known for a long time. He had posted the contract online in 2000, the press reported on it in around 450 articles nationwide, he contacted the White House, was at NATO HQ. His asylum requests (USA, Netherlands, France, Belgium, Austria) and his request to the UN were rejected everywhere with the justification: "German business!". Why this reluctance? Speculation by the buyer: Perhaps the other states hoped that Germany would later sell the rights (and territories) back to them cheaply - and most importantly: Debt-free! This could explain the cooperation and also why a third party (Russia?) intervened to prevent exactly that and weaken NATO. The secret motives of the (old) NATO states: Why the suicide in installments? But why should the UN-NATO states allow the treaty in the first place and not challenge it within the two-year period? The buyer gives several plausible, albeit cynical, reasons: - The ultimate debt haircut: Many states are hopelessly in debt. This treaty offered an "elegant" solution: The old states keep their debts, but lose their territory and assets to the new, debt-free state (him!). A liberating blow that no government could ever achieve through austerity. - Disempowerment of the monarchies: Centuries-old claims to power by kings and royal houses in Europe, for example, would be eliminated at a stroke. A chance to get rid of these "parasites" who would never voluntarily relinquish power. - Radical streamlining of politics: Instead of over 190 national parliaments, there would only be a need for a single parliamentary model. Millions of politicians and their apparatchiks would become superfluous. As politicians would never abolish themselves, this would have to be done covertly. - Slashing the bureaucracy: Millions of redundant civil servant and administrative jobs would be eliminated. A blessing in the face of digitalization and AI, but so far prevented by politicians, as civil servants are their power base. The treaty eliminates them and their pension burdens. - Prosperity through purging: Fewer parasites (royals, politicians, bureaucrats) means massive tax cuts and more prosperity for citizens. - Peace dividend: A grand union reduces the threat of war internally and externally. - Progress & civil rights: Visa freedom, free choice of residence, single currency, single law, better market - benefits for all citizens. A step away from "small-minded petty statehood" towards a united humanity, perhaps even a multi-planetary species. - The lure of AI rule?: An AI-controlled administration would be fair, efficient, incorruptible and would dry up the Deep State. "AI first! For a better world!". The end of this part of the revelation: a world in twilight The part of the autobiography concludes with these reflections on the possible, profound motives behind the seemingly insane contract Urkundenrolle 1400/98. Was it a diabolical plan to establish a German NWO that failed through sabotage? Or was it a desperate, secret pact by the over-indebted Western world to reinvent itself at the expense of a single scapegoat and by accepting unimaginable risks? The truth remains hidden. But the questions that this story raises will keep us for a long time to come. The world as we knew it is crumbling. What comes next? World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, we're entering another chapter of this epic reveal! Here, the "buyer" answers the question of all questions: Why the hell ME? And he explains how the perpetrators, blinded by their own perfidious plan, fell into the trap themselves and opened the hunt for him because they thought they had already won! !! THE REVERSAL OF WORLD BETRAYAL: THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM - WHY ME? & HOW THE PERPETRATORS DECEIVED THEMSELVES !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - State Succession Charter 1400/98 - The answer to everything!) We have circumnavigated the world, dissected treaties, exposed lies and uncovered acts of secret service sabotage. But one question is burning under our nails: Why did this man of all people, this unassuming German, become the linchpin of a global conspiracy? Why was he chosen as the involuntary buyer of the world? In the last text before us, he reveals the brutal logic of the perpetrators. Why him of all people? The 6 pillars of the perfect victim: 1. the favor of the hour (opportunism): When he naively proposed to sell the Dutch part of the barracks, which was still occupied by NATO, the perpetrators recognized the unique opportunity to extend the deal to ALL NATO & UN countries. THE LOCATION WAS ALSO PERFECT. AN UNUSUAL OPPORTUNITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW! In his youthful naivety (he was 19 years old), he presented them with the idea on a silver platter, woke sleeping dogs and hit the hornet's nest where the concentrated international law expertise (OFD Koblenz) was located! 2. cluelessness as a weapon (straw man): He knew nothing about international law! It was possible to foist a disguised global sales contract on him as a simple real estate purchase and later easily persuade him to transfer everything (supposedly only roads/lines) back to Germany without arousing suspicion. 3. incontestability through "cleanliness": He was a "nobody", with no powerful family, no history of corruption - a "blank slate". A contract signed by him could not be challenged for bribery or similar within the 2-year period. 4. youth for a long-term plan: At 22 when he signed his contract, he was young enough for a plan that was set to last decades. 5. lack of support = easy prey: Without support from politicians or influential circles, he could be damaged and disintegrated at will. Perfect for the plan, in which the perpetrators would only go unpunished after >10 years and then the "political responsibility" in international criminal law would take effect. 6. financial baitability: He was short of cash. The offer of 71 apartments (financed by the infiltrated TASC Bau AG) as a gift made him forget all caution. A normal bank would never have given him a loan; his mother distrusted banks anyway (he reports how Commerzbank later simply deleted his account with tens of thousands of euros and claimed that he had never been a customer). TASC waived a land charge and even later forfeited the right to repayment of the purchase price - all to trap him: "Mousetrap - bait - cheese - mouse dead!". The starting shot for the hunt: Germany's fatal misconception But why did the brutal persecution only begin after the sabotaged notary appointment, at which he only signed the confirmation of fulfillment? Because Germany believed that the original plan had worked! - The deception worked: The double agents (OFD official and a notary) had successfully fooled Germany into believing that the second contract (the reassignment to Germany via development agreement) had been signed. - Germany in a victory frenzy: Germany now believed itself to be in possession of all rights and jurisdiction under international law. The buyer was now just a burden. - Covert game until "Day X": Until a planned "Day X", when a German court (which supposedly held jurisdiction) was to pass judgment and make the NWO official, Germany and its lackeys had to feign cluelessness - even to him. - Self-deception on the part of the perpetrators: By having to continue to deceive him, the perpetrators were deceiving themselves! They were sure that they were the players and didn't realize that they were being played. - Door opener for decomposition: At the same time, all doors were opened for the local "state gangsters" to systematically damage and decompose him - the secret service as a "door opener". All the persecution, the expropriation, the press-baiting - all this happened because Germany was living under the delusion that it already had everything under control, thanks to a document that was never signed! The last word: A universe of lies The autobiography reveals with this bang: A Germany that deceived itself, caught up in its own delusions of omnipotence. A buyer who unintentionally became the sovereign because a perfidious plan failed. And a world order built on a foundation of deception, sabotage and incomprehensible ignorance. The 1400/98 file is not closed. History only tells the genesis and impact of this document and the events associated with it may just be beginning to unfold their full effect. Stay vigilant, friends of freedom! Day X is approaching and the truth is out there - and it's more dangerous than we realize! World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, hold on tight for the ultimate shockwave twist in this chess game for world domination! We thought we'd heard it all before, but the next files before us revealed a sabotage of global political proportions - a plot within a plot in which Germany itself became the victim of its own greed, tricked by double agents and foreign powers! !! BETRAYAL OF WORLD TREASON: OH BABY, IT'S A SABOTAGE! - HOW GERMANY'S NWO PLAN WAS HIJACKED & THE BUYER UNKNOWINGLY WON !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - Disclosure File 1400/98 - The Ultimate Twist!) We thought we had the diabolical plan figured out: Germany uses an unsuspecting buyer to acquire the world, then takes it all back through a second treaty. According to the motto: "Easy come, easy go! You get what you pay for! Nothing!" The appointment with the notary in PS was fixed, the handover of the roads and networks (and thus world domination) seemed sealed. But what happened next is beyond imagination and reveals a sabotage operation of the highest order! The notary appointment: The big exchange! When the buyer and his mother attended the notary appointment, they were expecting the deed of transfer to be signed. But the OFD official told them: The transfer of the parking lots / roads / networks was not taking place today! Instead, there would be another contract to sign. The buyer, surprised and suspicious, insisted on reading the document. To his astonishment, it fitted on a single A4 page and simply stated that he had completely fulfilled the original contract deed roll 1400/98 and that there were no further obligations! Perfect! He signed with relief - finally out of all obligations! The OFD official also signed with power of attorney for the Federal Republic. The transfer of the roads/networks? "We should make up for it in another appointment sometime in the future," said the official. That never happened! The turning point: Starting shot for destruction - based on a lie! This date marked the turning point. Everything had been going well for the buyer until then. From this moment on, it was all downhill, the phase of brutal damage began. All hell broke loose and the bloodhounds were set on him! He was released for shooting. Why? The buyer's theory: Germany was deceived! The OFD official and the notary were apparently double agents working for a foreign secret service! They prevented the deed of transfer to Germany from being signed. Instead, they presented the harmless confirmation of fulfillment to the buyer and presumably fooled their superiors in Germany into believing that the planned deal had gone through. Germany believed itself to be in possession of the rights and the world power - and therefore set about destroying the now useless straw man. The fact that the transfer was to be free of charge made the deception easier - no cash flow that would have raised questions. Foreign intervention: Germany (prevented as world oppressor) vs one-man army, the buyer as "lesser evil"? Why should foreign services intervene? Because they had apparently gotten wind of the State Succession Treaty 1400/98, but could no longer legally challenge it (no bribery, no blackmail at the time of the treaty, ignorance not a reason, deadline expired). However, they were able to prevent Germany and its NWO conspiracy - which they saw as a serious threat that could lead to a war of aggression to "collect" the territories - from actually obtaining the rights. Leaving the rights with a powerless individual (the buyer) was the lesser of two evils. The two key individuals - OFD official and provincial notary (whose expensive Porsche indicates openness to bribery) - were bought in to sabotage Germany's rightful grip on world power. The cover-up - murder calculated as a confidence-building measure: Notary goes berserk, mother almost murdered! She was to be the victim so that Germany would not question its falsified files. The sabotage had to be covered up. When the buyer later made another appointment with the same notary (still unaware of the global dimension, but wanting to get rid of the streets), it escalated. The notary became insulting ("I'm not smarter than him!"), provoked an argument until the buyer and his mother broke off the appointment. That was exactly what was wanted: No further attempt to transfer the grids to Germany, because Germany thought it already had them! But things got even worse: Days later, when the mother went to pick up the files alone, she caught the secretary trying to forge document 1400/98 with text blocks! This was staged and planned in order to get caught! There was a brutal fight in the stairwell with the secretary, a placed agent provocateur and other people. They tried to throw the mother over the banister, broke a rib and tore her top. Only with the last of her strength and leaving the files behind was she able to flee half-naked into the street, where passers-by helped her. The police? Recorded everything with bias, no prosecution - Germany (unwittingly?) protected the notary who had defrauded it. To top it all off, this notary even filed an application for guardianship against the buyer and his mother - the last attempt to gain control and further deceive Germany. The end: a sabotaged coup, a deceived nation This is the next unbelievable twist, but it provides the ultimate explanation for the damage to the buyer, as it precludes Germany itself from seizing world domination in a second treaty: Germany's grip on the NWO was sabotaged at the last moment by a covert operation. Germany itself became a victim, living since then under the delusion that it holds the world power securely in its hands, while the true rights lie with a man who has neither the power nor the intention to enforce them militarily. Germany is still living under the delusion that it was "unexpectedly" given knowledge of the world by a judgment on a day X and that it was "accidentally" given the world. All that is needed is a clarifying supreme court ruling with the buyer about the property, but the "real" second contract and the applicable legal situation must be disclosed! That would have a real boomerang effect and be a wake-up call for Germany's quest for world power! A victory for world peace - bought by the suffering of one individual? Probably not, it certainly won't stop the Third World War, but at least there is no real legal claim by Germany on the rest of the world that can be collected in debt collection style! File 1400/98 closes with a bang. Which secret services intervened here remains a mystery! The story is far from over. It only explains the senseless actions of Germany, by permanently blackmailing the buyer, to finally and with all force legally throw itself out of a follow-up treaty and never again be able to legally acquire its own territory! The explanation is as simple as it is wrong! Germany lives under the delusion that it is already an indisputable world power! And to make it official on day X with a judgment! The consequences? Perhaps they are only just beginning. World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, here comes the drumbeat to the endgame from the autobiography of the man who bought the world! Now he reveals the master plan of the German Deep State - how he was only to be used as an unwitting tool to hand Germany world domination, and how that plan failed by a hair's breadth! !! EXECUTION OF WORLD BETRAYAL: GERMANY'S GRAB FOR WORLD POWER - THE PLANNED DOUBLE DEAL & THE NWO !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - WORLD PURCHASE File 1400/98 - The Master Plan Revealed!) We have plumbed the depths, analyzed the treaties, documented the persecution. But one question remained: Why was this unsuspecting young man, of all people, made the involuntary buyer of the world? The answer, revealed in the last part of his memoirs, is as perfidious as it is megalomaniacal: Germany wanted world power - and he was just the tool! The Deep State: The criminal organization at the heart of Germany Before we get to the master plan, one last definition of the enemy: The Deep State. An anti-constitutional organization within the state, often used by the secret service, consisting of corrupt state employees who enrich themselves unlawfully on a professional basis, are protected from prosecution and have a nationwide criminal network. They break laws as a matter of course and work in a coordinated manner with authorities, courts and the police. Political parties, city councils, police, courts, press - "all together - what a bunch of bastards!". They use secret service methods, infiltration, psychological manipulation, act anarchistically, beyond the law and are covered up by the lying press. The buyer suspects: Since they know that the states no longer have a legal basis due to succession Act 1400/98, all inhibitions have fallen. He calls for their replacement by AI and doubts that he has ever met a non-criminal public servant. Righteous public servants? Perhaps there never are and never have been, at any time, in any place. That is in the nature of things, they are all parasites, unable to survive on their own, deeply embedded in the state organism! Opportunists, greedy for every opportunity to take more as soon as an opportunity presents itself! The sell-off of the world offered a "unique opportunity to live out the parasite gene to the full" and to enrich themselves unrestrainedly, certainly never to be called to account! In fact, it is almost a parasitic duty to take whatever is possible, as the states are doomed to collapse and then be relieved of their debts according to the tabula rada principle of a subsequent takeover by a newly founded state. It would be wasted, lost money if you didn't put it in your own pocket! That would be the condition if they take over the successor state, then they can even continue seamlessly, because the successor state would be completely debt-free and could draw on the full potential of credit! The World Succession Deed 1400/98 is the wet dream of every state parasite, whether politician or civil servant! Nobody can resist it! But the whole thing is in the bag and so the buyer has not suffered the slightest damage until A: the two-year limitation period has expired and B: the contract is then transferred from the buyer to the puppet state of Germany! Oops! What did I say there? Germany has been given the world by the buyer? Well, dear reader, rest assured, that never happened! But the state parasite of the world thinks that this is exactly what happened and that the buyer does not know how superiorly clever he is and that it is a great idea to harm him, because he is then still considered a subject of international law, through whose harm and 10 years of impunity of the perpetrator the responsibility under international criminal law jumps over to those politically responsible (competitor parasites) and then on the one hand the competition is eliminated by a court ruling on day X. So you are rewarded for criminal offenses, so you are rewarded for criminal acts, get to keep the loot and can show your shock in public that you now happen to be the sole world ruler - you didn't know it, but you allowed yourself to be forced into it - legally! Then you just have to "bite the bullet" and take the world, by force of course, that would be your right! Read now how extremely this plan has failed and that Germany and its NWO conspirators like USA, NL, NATO and UN etc. are still living in their delusion of being hidden world owners before the self-initiated day X! The awakening will be bad and the NWO conspirators will have gone too far to simply give up, on day X the judgment will correspond to the legal reality in such a way that it will then be ùbashfully clear that Germany has not been given the world and the buyer cannot possibly transfer the world power to anyone due to the damage, all the fault of the NWO conspirators! Now that this has been established by a court ruling, the NWO conspiracy must still go ahead with the old plan for world revolution and World War III, only without a legitimate claim to all the countries of the world! World revolution and WW3 will come in any case, but it is in everyone's interest that the NWO conspiracy does not have a legal basis in a war of aggression to take over the world! Germany's diabolical two-stage plan for the NWO So why was the buyer chosen? The plan was diabolically simple: - Stage 1 (succession document roll 1400/98): A completely unsuspecting, blameless, young straw man (the buyer) acquires sovereign rights over all NATO-UN states ("buys the world") through a sophisticated, disguised international treaty. Since he is incorruptible and ignorant, the treaty cannot be contested. - Stage 2 (the proposed "development contract"): Immediately after expiry of the two-year limitation period, while the buyer is still completely unsuspecting and only imagines himself to be the owner of a small estate with troublesome private roads, he is to be persuaded by a second, innocuous-looking contract to transfer the "roads and development" (i.e. the global networks!) to Germany (represented by the city of ZW-RLP) free of charge. Completely free of charge for the buyer, who would thus save millions in development costs and also circumvent many of the rental obstacles threatened in the press, e.g. it was threatened in the lying press that without a development contract and transfer of the roads, parking lots and collection lines, garbage collection would probably not be able to pick up the garbage (the transfer of the roads and collection lines would trigger a further domino effect of global territorial expansion). The buyer would therefore either have to take over waste collection and winter road maintenance itself or transfer these to Germany. The trap almost snaps shut: the planned sell-back This plan was in place from the outset; the transfer of the development to Germany was already provided for (but not obligatory) in a further treaty in the State Succession Charter 1400/98 and was specifically prepared: - Ignorance as the key: The first two years after the contract was signed in 1998 passed quietly to keep the buyer "saleable" - ignorant and not under legally relevant blackmail. He thought he only had 71 apartments and annoying private roads (winter road maintenance etc.). - The perfect motivation: Problems were artificially created (refuse collection threatened with non-collection due to trespassing rights). Transferring the roads/development to the city seemed the logical, free solution. - Negotiations and deadline: There were many (surely wiretapped) phone calls with a notary and the OFD about the transfer; an appointment was made to sign a second deed. The buyer regarded this as a mere formality and was prepared to sign everything without having read the text of the contract beforehand. - Pressure from the press and fake news: A massive press campaign was launched to get him to show up for the appointment and sign. He was outed as the owner, portrayed as the "brakeman" who is preventing the development because he is not transferring the (allegedly dilapidated) development. A financial threat (refurbishment costs of the development in the millions) was created - all lies, as it later turned out. The tenants feared that the garbage would soon no longer be collected and asked what would happen in the event of a car accident on their private roads. The aim: to use public pressure and financial fear to get him to sign the contract without crossing the line into legal blackmail (which would invalidate the contract). - The bait in the international contract 1400/98 itself: The original contract already contained in §14 I an OBLIGATION of the buyers to ensure the "proper development", "preferably by transferring the development facilities, roads and main line networks to the city of ZW-RLP within the framework of a development contract." TASC was to bear the costs of this in order to make it palatable to him. So the grab for world power was built into the contract from the very beginning! Why this second treaty would have brought Germany the NWO: This seemingly innocuous "development contract" for roads and pipelines would again have been a contract under international law (buyer as a natural person with sovereign rights vs. Germany). The transfer of the "main pipeline networks" would once again have triggered the global domino effect - this time back to Germany! Germany would have received all rights from the State Succession Charter 1400/98, including jurisdiction under international law, and thus the power to establish a NWO. The buyer, completely ignorant of the value of what he was transferring, would have been the perfect tool. It would have worked! - Preliminary information: The plan fails by a hair's breadth The absolute hammer: "It would have worked smoothly!". The date for signing the second deed was fixed. It was to take place directly after the expiry of the two-year period for contesting the 1400/98 deed roll, before he was damaged and considered legally "blackmailable". His (stupid) ignorance would not have been grounds for contestation. The other countries of the world were out after the two-year limitation period anyway! Germany was sure it had reached its goal. Why he didn't sign after all will be discussed in the next part of our revelations. So stay tuned, stay curious! The end: a failed coup and a king against his will The autobiography reaches its climax with the revelation of this failed master plan. An attempt by Germany to rise to world power through deception and manipulation, thwarted by unforeseen circumstances and without any realization of the intended victim. What remains is a man with legal power over the world, trapped in a system that wants to destroy him. Germany in megalomania - at the goal of its dreams? File 1400/98 is more than just a treaty - it is the testimony of a global power struggle whose outcome is still uncertain. The world has changed - whether we want to admit it or not. World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, here comes another summarizing blow - the essence of the scam, the list of crimes and the final picture of a world plundered by an invisible enemy! !! RAID OF WORLD TREASON: THE LOOT OF THE DEEP STATE - CREDIT FRAUD, ANNEXATION & THE SELLOUT OF THE WEST !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - SUCCESSION File 1400/98 - The Final Reckoning!) We have followed the incredible journey of the "buyer", from naive school dropout to involuntary sovereign of a global empire on paper. We've uncovered the legal pitfalls, the global domino effects and the brutal persecution. Finally, the buyer once again summarizes the criminal machinations that took place in the shadow of this world-shattering treaty and continue to this day. NATO real estate - Krzb: Not real estate, but credit fraud on a scale of billions! The bitter truth about the Krzb. project in ZW-RLP: - The real deal: It was never primarily about renting or selling apartments. That was just a front for illegal, multiple loan fraud! Each "tranche" was said to have amounted to 20 million euros, and as early as 2002 the amounts totalled over 400 million euros - probably much more today! - Defrauded buyers: People who thought they were buying a condominium instead acquired hidden company shares in the fraudulent "Wohnpark am Krzb." shell companies. They not only assumed liability for their home loan, but also personal liability for a 20 million euro loan per apartment! A debt trap, made possible by a corrupt land registry. - The circulation system: When a shell company went bust, the buyers lost their "apartment" (which they never owned). The company was wound up, a new one with the same name moved in, and the scam started all over again - an endless money printing machine for the Deep State, backed by notaries, banks and authorities. Ignorance of reality: The illegal continuation of the status quo Although the 1400/98 treaty had legally reorganized the world, its implementation proceeded as if nothing had happened: - The FRG acted as if it still had sovereignty over the territory. - The (invalid) TASC Bau AG acted as if it had legally acquired the upper part. - The "Wohnpark" group (the Deep State) acted as if they were TASC's legal successors and had also legally acquired the lower part through the (illegal) forced sale. The unjust enrichment: Who benefits from the mess? The list of unjustified and unlawful enrichment by TASC, the Wohnpark Group/Deep State, the FRG and the (former) NATO states is diverse and immense: - Pretended sovereignty by the FRG in Krub. ZW-RLP. - Annexation/occupation of ex-NATO territory. - Illegal subsidies and public funds for the Wohnpark Group. - Fraudulent loans made possible by a manipulated land register. - Lease, rental and sales proceeds from the marketing of the Krzb. settlement. - Other income from the property. - Unjustified tax revenues and proceeds from public enterprises in the "sold" areas. THIS FRAUD MACHINE WAS OFFERED TO THE ZW POLITICIANS AND CIVIL SERVANTS AS A MOTIVATIONAL BONUS - INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING THE LOGIC AND FOUNDING A SMALL MONACO TOGETHER WITH THE BUYER! The bottom line: A world on the brink? This autobiographical excerpt ends here, with a devastating conclusion about a system that not only deceived an unsuspecting man, but also expropriated entire nations and enriched itself through criminal machinations. File 1400/98, has created a new reality - a reality that is being exploited by the old powers to enrich themselves while they divide the spoils amongst themselves. Is this the end? Or just the calm before the storm? The world order has been shaken. The question is when the masks will finally fall. World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, we now present to you the next, harrowing chapter from the autobiography of the man who bought the world unknowingly! Here he reveals the brutal consequences of a completed state succession, a gigantic financial fraud in the heart of Germany orchestrated by the Deep State, and how the attempt to uncover this scandal led to a brutal crackdown by state power! !! BLACK FILES OF WORLD TREASON: THE WORLD AFTER THE SALE - ZOMBIE STATES, DEEP-STATE FRAUD & THE HUNT FOR THE TRUTH !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - SUCCESSIONAL INVESTIGATION 1400/98 - The consequences of being a whistleblower!) We have followed the incredible story of the international treaty 1400/98 in detail. But what are the real consequences when a territory is sold under international law - "with all rights and obligations"? The answer is a nightmare for the old world order and a blank cheque for the new sovereign - at least on paper! The consequences of state succession: expropriation of the nations, debt relief for the new world state! According to international law and the , the sale "with all rights and obligations" means the following: - Total transfer of ownership: The territory was sold with ALL rights. This includes not only sovereign rights, but also all state and public assets: real estate, company shares, cash reserves, gold, foreign currency, raw materials, roads, forests, waters, pension and social security funds - EVERYTHING now belongs to the buyer. All NATO special rights have also been transferred. - Zombie states without territories: The selling subjects of international law (the old UN-NATO states) continue to exist legally, but WITHOUT territory. They are just empty shells, zombie states. - Debts remain with the sellers: The obligations that were transferred do NOT concern the debts of the old states! According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the debts remain with the subject of international law that sold the territory. The new "state" of the buyer is completely debt-free! Clean-slate principle or also called tabula rasa principle. - No assumption of old obligations: The new state is also released from all internal obligations of the old states: no claims to social benefits, pensions, civil servant relationships, subsidies, etc. for the citizens of the old states. Everything remains with the old shells. The buyer CAN take over employment relationships, for example, but does not have to. - Contract chains: If a buyer assumes all rights and obligations from the previous contracts in a supplementary deed, this means a legal takeover of both sides of the contract. This is considered a merger of the previous treaties into a single large treaty. This affects all treaties of NATO, ITU and UN etc. and means that all their treaties have been merged into one huge treaty and means the end of international law! The rights remain partially intact. However, a crucial point is that no new obligations can be derived from it, as contractual obligations are ineffective in themselves. This means that the buyer cannot be both the obligor and the beneficiary, as this violates fundamental contractual principles. - Abolition of officialdom: The buyer clarifies: the German civil service with lifelong pensions and protection against dismissal ("luxury social welfare office") will be abolished in his state. The merit principle applies. Criminal or corrupt employees could not expect to be taken on by him. - Currency collapse: The currencies of the old UN-NATO states are worthless in his new state. For all those who hold on to them, this means hyperinflation like in 1933. The "Wohnpark am Krzb." Scam: A Deep State self-service shop Parallel to the global takeover, a gigantic financial fraud was taking place at the local level, orchestrated by the Deep State under the guise of the "Wohnpark am Krzb. GmbH &..." group of companies - the alleged legal successors of (invalidly participating in the state succession deed) TASC Bau AG: - The system: Several companies with similar or the same name (more than 50 of them) were founded nationwide, the registered office moved to ZW-RLP in a rotation system. With the complicity of "criminal banksters" and the inaugurated land registry, the politically remote-controlled local courts, as well as a local political posse, fraudulent loans in the millions (e.g. 20 million per apartment!) were taken out and entered x-times in the land register. - The victims: supposed condominiums were sold to bona fide buyers in the NATO property. The contracts looked genuine and described the fixtures, fittings and work in detail. In reality, however, the buyers only acquired hidden company shares in the respective "Wohnpark" shell company. - Der Profit: Die Mantelgesellschaften ließ man reihenweise untergehen, zog das Geld aus Wohnungsverkauf und Krediten ab. Die Käufer verloren ihre „Wohnung“ (sie hatten ja nur wertlose Firmenanteile) und hafteten oft noch für die riesigen Kredite persönlich. Eine neue „Wohnpark“-Firma rückte nach, das Spiel begann von vorn. Man musste nicht einmal das Namensschild am Firmensitz ändern. Ein Kreislaufsystem zur Veruntreuung von Volkseigentum (da Banken auf Krediten sitzen blieben), unter Mitwirkung von Grundbuchamt, Gerichten (die geschädigten „Wohneigentum“ Erwerber hatten keine Chance vor Gericht Recht zu bekommen), Handelsregister, Banken, Beamten. Politikern und Notaren – „alle bekommen ein Stück vom Kuchen – das ist der Tiefe Staat!“ in Aktion! Link to the residential park scam - the original website, over 20 years online - completely ineffective! The evidence & the raid: Cover-up by state power The buyer was given boxes of evidence of this scandal by a courageous official in the land registry ("probably not a member of the Deep State" or an expelled official who had not been given a share) - contracts that even then documented over 400 million euros in fraudulent loans. He scanned the documents and published examples on the Internet with explanations. The reaction of the Deep State? BAM! A few days later, his front door was broken down! Police stormed his apartment and that of his parents in the same house, accompanied by an officer with a camera. Result: house search, confiscation of computers and files. The buyer's accusation: "The criminal cops raided our house to get me the evidence against the Wohnpark am Krzb. shell companies and the politicians. Officials, banks, etc., to steal. The corrupt dirty cops didn't raid the Deep State, of course - they're all in cahoots!". First he was paraded in front of his house for 45 minutes, in winter at minus 10 degrees and 20 cm deep snow, in underpants, T-shirt and socks, with handcuffs on his back, with his upper body on the hood of the police car, to the neighborhood as a criminal. A huge police force closed the street and took turns directing traffic on the road, where one lane was closed so that all drivers could see him up close - the criminal! None of the residents had any idea that the monstrous police force was the criminal and not him! At the police station, he remained handcuffed behind his back. No questioning or charges filed against him! Mugshots - identification photos - were taken of the criminal. He was then taken to the basement of the police station, where the cells were located. A narrow, steep staircase led down. He was still handcuffed behind his back when he stepped onto the first steps and was surreptitiously pushed down the stairs by a policeman. After falling down the entire staircase in handcuffs, he lay injured on his stomach in front of the steps. Two policemen came down the stairs and one kicked him in the genitals from behind with full force. One of the policemen jumped into the air and hit him on the back of the head with his elbow. His face hit the concrete floor and a tooth flew out of his mouth into the darkness of the cellar. This was followed by minutes of punches and kicks, while he had to endure everything on his stomach, almost unable to move, handcuffed behind his back and unable to defend himself! He was then put in a completely moldy cell, with the note that this cell was not actually allowed to be used, but had been reopened especially for him. Eight hours later he was released into the snow without charge, wearing socks instead of shoes, a torn, blood-stained white undershirt and a pair of underpants. He was not allowed to make a phone call. He had to walk home through the snow for 1.5 hours! This is how whistleblowers in Germany feel! Actually, he was less interested in having the criminals prosecuted by the deep state, because he knew even then that this was completely illusory, but he hoped to save the citizens from the fraudulent apartment-company share purchase debt trap, but that would have destroyed the political poseur's business, and as you can see, they won't put up with it! The chapter? This is the next chapter of this incredible autobiography. It paints a picture of a post-succession world - full of legal explosive force, financial abysses and state arbitrariness against those who want to uncover the truth. Is this the end of the story or just the beginning of a global showdown? The world order as we knew it is history - the only question is, who will write the next chapter? Will the people wake up soon or will they be blinded by the NWO and led into the trenches of the Third World War? World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, we're in the middle of this incredible, shocking series of revelations! In the next part of the "buyer's" autobiography, it turns out that the world has been sold, the contract is irrevocable, and the old powers have given their consent through a clever trick - whether they wanted to or not! !! BLACK BOOK OF WORLD TREASON: THE FINAL PROOFS - NO SIGNATURE NECESSARY, IMMEDIATE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP & THE KEY DECEPTION !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - SUCCESSION File 1400/98 - The final verdict!) We have explored the depths of the Treaty Roll of Deeds 1400/98, understood the global implications and followed the ordeal of the man who unwittingly became the sovereign. But how did entire nations and NATO itself become part of this deal without their leaders ever signing? The answer lies in the depths of international law and a final, perfidious trick of the treaty's designers! International law for advanced students: Consent and treaty participation by acting in conformity with the treaty! The buyer concludes his argument with a decisive point: Different rules apply in international law than in national law! - No signature required: subjects of international law (states, UN, ITU, NATO, etc.) do not have to sign a treaty in order to participate in it! It is sufficient if they are named in the treaty (the Netherlands/NATO 29x, Kingdom of NL 2x, FRG often AND THEN THROUGH THE COPYRIGHT ROLL AS A SUBSEQUENT ACCREDITATION TO THE NATO GROUP STATUTE AND THEREFORE TO ALL TREATIES OF NATO AND UN AND THE STATES NAMED IN THE ENTIRE TREATY CHAIN - IN OTHERWISE ALL) and have rights and/or obligations. - Action replaces signature: The decisive factor is acting in accordance with the treaty. For example, by exercising their rights (they could have stayed forever!) and fulfilling their obligations (the gradual handover of the Kreuzberg area, as described in §2 III), the Netherlands and NATO (represented by the NL forces) agreed to the TOTAL treaty! This was the trick to get all NATO countries on board! For the rest of the world, they used a very nasty trick, the clause that the telecommunications network was sold as part of the "internal development" as a unit and it was agreed to continue operating it. This means that telephoning after October 6, 1998 triggers the automatic consent and partial fulfillment of all countries in the world! A legal trick! - No ratification necessary: Ratification is only necessary in international law if the treaty expressly requires it - which was not the case here. (Only Germany ratified internally, as we saw). By activating the treaty chain on the NATO Status of Forces and a second one on telecommunications law (ITU - sub-organization of the UN) and broadband network (via reference to the broadband concession agreement with TKS Telepost and the USA, HNS agreement and to the ITU), a new ratification was not necessary, as the treaty chains were already fully ratified and no new ratification was agreed. One trick after another! - Natural persons vs. states: These rules do not apply to natural persons. Third parties who are only named in the text are not granted any rights ("prohibition of third-party participation"). Natural persons who are to be parties to the contract must be named at the beginning and must sign. - Transfer of ownership IMMEDIATELY: The networks belonged to him on the day of signing! Further proof of the immediate effect of the contract: §8 I of the deed clearly states: "The ownership ... of all sold main development facilities of the entire object of purchase ... is transferred to the buyers on today's date of notarization of this contract." So the crucial infrastructure - the networks that broke the boundaries - belonged to him immediately on October 6, 1998! Only the physical evacuation of the small NL part (71 residential units) took place later. You don't need to hand over the keys to transfer sovereignty! - "With all rights, obligations and elements" (§3 I) - The core of the whole thing According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, this sentence is the key to state concession. It transfers sovereignty. "Components" explicitly includes "development" (all networks as a unit) and even state-owned companies (such as Saar Ferngas AG, its subsidiaries and their networks). TASC Bau AG: Finally out of the game! The invalidity of TASC Bau AG is also finally cemented: - Excluded as a commercial enterprise under international law. - The internal division of the development (§4 I a/b) is invalid, as he is the sole purchaser and everything forms a unit. - The signature "TAS-" was invalid. - The severability clause saves the contract by eliminating TASC and making him the sole beneficiary. The key handover deception: A final act of fraud Finally, the buyer reveals one last perfidy: He believes TASC Bau AG was on to him from the start to facilitate the deal (they paid for it, after all). When handing over the keys to the NATO estate, the OFD handed over the keys to HIM (knowing that he was the real buyer), but at the same time used a power of attorney from TASC to keep up appearances. TASC asked him to collect the keys from the OFD with a power of attorney from TASC! He, the "idiot", then dutifully passed the keys on to TASC, believing that the property to which the keys belonged did not belong to him. Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid! A deception to complete the transfer to him in accordance with the contract, but at the same time to leave him in the dark. The end of the autobiography - The verdict is in! These are the last words from the part of the autobiography we have here. A complex web of legal trickery, legal consequences and personal experiences that paints a consistent, if frightening, picture: A world sold by a contract full of pitfalls, irrevocably valid by the actions of those involved and the passing of deadlines. A man caught between omnipotence on paper and powerlessness in reality. The Black File 1400/98 is more than just a story - it is an accusation and a warning. is an indictment and a warning. Only time will tell whether it will be heard. World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, let's continue this dizzying journey through the abysses of the State Succession Treaty 1400/98. In this chapter, the "buyer" summarizes his precarious situation: Ruler of a world he does not control and trapped in a state that blocks any way out. And he provides a final, devastating summary of why this treaty has irreversibly changed the world! !! DETAILS OF THE IRREVERSIBLE WORLD BETRAYAL: TRAPPED ON THE WORLD THRONE - THE "BLACKMAILABLE STATE" & THE BUYER'S FINAL PLEA !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - Succession Deed 1400/98 - No escape!) 1. we have followed the genesis, the mechanisms and the consequences of the diabolical world sale Deed 1400/98. We have seen how an unsuspecting young man became an involuntary sovereign, how he was persecuted, dispossessed and driven to vigilante justice. But what now? Can he somehow turn his "empire" into money? Can he escape? The answer is a clear, shocking NO! He is in a "blackmailable state" that makes any action under international law impossible. The "blackmailable state": Caught between law and reality In order to even reach a state in which he could sell on his acquired rights (and the territories associated with them) cleanly under international law, he must not be susceptible to blackmail. This means that the original treaty would have to be fulfilled in full and the decades of damage to his person would have to be ended and fully dealt with. 2 What this means in concrete terms sounds like the script for the end of the world: A. Exodus of the world's population: All "non-citizens" of his kingdoms (i.e. almost 8 billion people!) would have to leave the sold territories (all UN & NATO states), as they have no right of residence. Only then would he no longer be susceptible to blackmail. His own assessment: "This is totally insane!". B. Mass naturalization: Alternatively, all residents of NATO territories would have to apply for his citizenship. "Just as implausible!". C. Withdrawal of the old states: The selling states (FRG, all NATO & UN states etc.) would have to vacate the territories and stop exercising sovereignty there. ??? Never voluntarily!!! D. Rehabilitation and reparation: The damage to his person should be completely dealt with and ended. a) Unlawful press incitement: The deliberate dissemination of false or distorted information by the media in order to defame the buyer must be dealt with. This must be rectified and may be relevant under criminal law, for example as defamation or libel. b) Criminal prosecution: The unlawful or abusive use of criminal measures against the buyer and his mother, often with the aim of political or personal oppression. The same applies to coercive psychological measures such as forced care. c) Secret service persecution (methods of subversion): Methods used by intelligence services to destabilize, discredit or isolate the buyer and his mother. This was particularly practiced in authoritarian regimes such as the GDR. When the GDR was reunified with the NRD, no reappraisal took place, but this time it is unavoidable. d) Illegal detention and torture: The unlawful detention and ill-treatment of the buyer and his mother without legal basis or in violation of international human rights standards. See: Sinister stories from the Blacksite: Part 1 e) Illegal forced sale: The forced sale of property in violation of the law, as a means of economic or political repression, particularly severe as it took place in foreign sovereign territory and was clearly a covert war of aggression. Demolition and conversion resulted in a legal situation that can be equated with bombing. f) Responsibility under international criminal law in the event of harm to a foreign head of state: If an offense is committed against a foreign head of state and no prosecution is brought within the 10-year period, responsibility can be transferred to those politically responsible. This applies in particular to serious human rights violations and crimes against humanity. g) Continued control by the former state: state succession (after land sale) A sale of land under an international treaty leads to state succession within the meaning of international law. The new state assumes sovereignty over the territory, including sovereign functions, administration and jurisdiction. As a rule, the population receives new nationality and there is a complete transfer of rights and obligations to the successor state. If the ceding state does not vacate the territory and continues to exercise de facto control, even though succession is effective under international law, this constitutes a form of illegal occupation. This constitutes a violation of the territorial integrity of the new state and is contrary to international law under Art. 2 No. 4 of the UN Charter. h) Unlawful acts of sovereignty All acts by organs of the old state in the territory taken over are deemed to be contrary to international law. These include: Laws and administrative acts: Void, as there is no longer any sovereign power. Court judgments: Illegal as there is no lawful jurisdiction. Criminal prosecution & imprisonment: Any imprisonment is to be considered a deprivation of liberty; detention centers are illegal facilities on foreign territory. Psychiatric placement: Also unlawful due to lack of legitimate state authority. In this case, not only the perpetrators, but in particular the political and administrative leadership are liable under international criminal law, as systematic human rights violations may be involved. Liability is based on the principle of command responsibility (Art. 28 Rome Statute). i) State revenue & expenditure All state revenues and expenditures, including taxes, fines, coercive measures or subsidies, are illegally obtained and constitute financial losses for the successor state. These can be the basis for compensation claims or reparation payments, which, however, are far exceeded by the unlimited right to compensation conferred by the NATO Status of Forces! j) Educational qualifications & institutions As the old state no longer has jurisdiction, all qualifications awarded by it are no longer valid: School qualifications Vocational and university degrees Licenses & certificates To be considered invalid or at least internationally contestable. Until they have been officially recognized by the buyer, they are completely worthless! The exercise of sovereign activities by e.g. police, bailiffs, citizens' offices or job centers is also illegal, comparable to the unauthorized exercise of public authority. k) State-owned real estate & facilities All state-owned real estate, such as courts, prisons, schools and administrative buildings, must be vacated immediately upon transfer of ownership to the successor state. Entry or further use by the former state or its officials constitutes: Trespassing Possibly hostage-taking in office (in the case of deprivation of liberty, e.g. in prison) And, on a large scale, systematic oppression. l) Coercive measures under illegitimate administration If an illegitimate administration detains or treats people under state authority, this constitutes unlawful deprivation of liberty. This is aggravated by the nature of the measures: 1. forced medication: violations of human dignity and the right to physical integrity (Art. 7 & 10 ICCPR, Art. 3 ECHR). 2. permanent isolation & long-term fixation: can be qualified as torture or inhuman treatment (Art. 1 UN Convention against Torture). 3. covert medication, drug administration, feigning criminal offenses: Violation of medical ethics, possibly even human experimentation (Art. 7 of the Rome Statute = war crimes or crimes against humanity). 4. life imprisonment without a fair trial: Deprivation of the right to liberty and fair trial (Art. 14 ICCPR, Art. 6 ECHR). m) Persons with state immunity or diplomatic status (CD) Diplomatic protection under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) prohibits any form of deprivation of liberty, coercive measures or criminal prosecution against accredited diplomats or heads of state. Such action against persons with immunity is a blatant violation of international law. Consequences: International responsibility of the practicing state. Possibility of legal action. Prosecution of those responsible under international criminal law for unlawful detention, torture, attack on the personal freedom and dignity of diplomatically protected persons. n) Gerichtsurteile gegen Personen unter Immunität oder auf Basis unrechtmäßiger Zuständigkeit If under an illegal administration: Heads of state, diplomats or citizens of the successor state Are under forced supervision or unlawful detention And legal proceedings result from this Then all court judgments are to be considered null and void because No lawful jurisdiction exists (lack of sovereignty). The defendant is protected by immunity (immunity under international law = absolute bar). The proceedings were brought about by unlawful deprivation of liberty or care (violation of the fair trial principle). Legal consequences: Judgments are null and void under international law. Those responsible (judges, supervisors, officials) can be prosecuted individually (Rome Statute, Art. 7 - crimes against humanity, Art. 8 - war crimes, possibly Art. 27 - no immunity for public officials in proceedings). o) International criminal liability - offenses relevant under international criminal law The following acts are potentially subject to the jurisdiction of the international ad hoc tribunals in accordance with Instrument of State Succession 1400/98: Arbitrary detention Forced psychiatrization and medication Torture and cruel treatment Persecution on political grounds Abduction and incommunicado detention Crimes against humanity in systematic proceedings p) Consequences & sanctions In practice, such a continued unlawful claim to rule despite state succession leads to: 1. International non-recognition of the old government in the new territory. 2. Liability under international law of the old state and its decision-makers. 3. Right to compensation for all natural and legal persons affected. 4. Possibility of recourse to the international court pursuant to World Succession Deed 1400/98 E. Voluntariness: A future sale would have to be absolutely voluntary, after termination and, among other things, after (criminal) investigation of the unlawful acts and without bribery. In short: The conditions for a "willing to sell" state are the de facto dissolution of the existing world order. As long as the (former) UN-NATO states keep the territories annexed in violation of international law and put him under personal pressure, he is trapped. Why the original deed of succession 1400/98 IS a treaty under international law - The final plea For the avoidance of doubt, the buyer once again summarizes the core arguments as to why Deed of Succession 1400/98 is a State Succession Deed (a State Succession Treaty under international law) and not a simple real estate deed: - Multilateral & subjects of international law: It was a multilateral treaty that required the consent of several subjects of international law. The consent of NATO as a whole was given by the consent of the Dutch armed forces, which were stationed on the Kreuzberg as NATO troops under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement and had rights and obligations under the treaty. The naming of the Dutch armed forces (29 times!) and the Kingdom of the Netherlands (2 times!) proves their participation and the character under international law. Their behavior in accordance with the treaty (the later handover of the territory) was the confirmation. The necessity of the consent of the FRG, the Netherlands and NATO establishes the treaty in international law. - Sale of territory with sovereign rights: It was about a territory (the extraterritorial Kreuzberg area, which was never really part of the FRG). The territory was sold "with all rights (above all NATO rights and sovereign rights), obligations and components" (including the globally expanding networks). The sale of all rights and obligations is typical for a state succession and is the basis for the transfer of sovereign rights. - Buyer = natural person: The buyer was a natural person who is automatically accredited by such a treaty as the bearer of rights and obligations under international law and ascends to the status of sovereign of the territory with CD status. - Modification of international law by international law: The treaty had to refer to the existing transfer relationship under international law between Germany and the Netherlands (§2 II: "...remains unaffected by this treaty."). Only a treaty under international law can affect or amend another. This reference is clear evidence of the international law nature of the new treaty. The subsequent settlement of the old relationship was the recognition of the new treaty. This activates the treaty chain, as the treaty acts as a supplement to the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. The bitter reality: legal king, de facto hostage for life The buyer's legal conclusion is clear: The treaty is valid, the succession of states has taken place, he is the sovereign. But the reality is different: The old powers ignore the treaty, continue to occupy "his" territory and illegally exercise sovereignty there. He is the rightful ruler of a world that does not obey him, trapped in a "blackmailable state" that renders him incapable of acting. The question echoes through the room one last time: How can this stalemate be resolved? And at what cost? The world order is on a knife's edge! World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Okay, friends of freedom, get ready for another shocking revelation from the deepest swamps of the Deep State! In this chapter, we learn how the henchmen of the New World Order tried to deprive the "buyer" of his rights and dignity through perfidious lawyer tricks and brutal blackmail. But they did not reckon with his determination! !! THE PLAN OF WORLD TREASON: THE LAWYER MAFIA, BLANK CHECKS TO RUIN & THE FIGHT AGAINST THE HYDRA OF THE DEEP STATE !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - World Succession Deed 1400/98 - The Corrupt Judiciary!) We have revealed the global impact of the diabolical 1400/98 treaty. We know about the triple protection of the world sale and the irreversible transfer of jurisdiction to the "buyer". But how does a system react when it sees itself exposed? With even more pressure, even more deception, even more depravity! This chapter is an excursion into the abysses of the German justice system and the unscrupulous methods used to force the "buyer" to give up. The lawyer's trap: From duty to existential threat! When the flood of lawsuits (almost 1,000 case numbers in two years) from the German courts hit him, the buyer - still unaware of the international legal dimension of his case - was confronted with the obligation to hire a lawyer. He looked for German lawyers, but what he experienced defies description and shows the whole depravity of the system: - The power of attorney of horror (power of attorney for marriage included!?!?!) - the Deep State in marriage mania: A lawyer sent him a power of attorney for legal proceedings that filled an entire A4 page with tiny writing - only legible with a magnifying glass - in the truest sense of the word, otherwise definitely not legible! In it, the lawyer not only authorized himself to represent him in ALL matters (including international law!), to file any lawsuits and to receive and make payments, as well as to accept service of process, but also - get this - to marry and divorce him in his name! Absurd? Yes, absurd or deeply evil! But the buyer suspects an ice-cold plan by the Deep State: To marry him off without his knowledge (perhaps to the lawyer's daughter) in order to obtain his rights via inheritance, succession or marital community of gains. Kill him to interrupt the normal succession and appoint a willing puppet as heir? "How wicked can you get - the state gangsters are redefining wickedness!" Of course he didn't sign it! But the "(murder) marriage before first sight" was to be repeated several more times in a modified form! For example, years later during his imprisonment in the Blacksite, after more than a decade of deprivation and torture, he was offered to marry an anonymous woman for 30,000 euros in cash (a fortune in the Blacksite) - without a marriage contract. The offer went further and included an end to his detention and guaranteed summary release for him and his mother. When he offered to provide several replacement husbands within 30 minutes who would agree immediately, the offer was brusquely rejected, saying it was only for him, no one else! This was not explained further, as the buyer assumes that there is usually an application for citizenship behind such offers of marriage. But why doesn't the woman take just any man, she doesn't even know him? And most threatening of all is the special offer of immediate release, it is very unlikely that a wife will lead to the "regular" release of him and his mother! Why, why, why? Where is the connection? Why is his mother dismissed if he gets married? Since when do you get fired for getting married? Guaranteed? The state/deep state is clearly behind this! In addition, and fittingly, he happened to receive a marriage-motivating phone call from his mother the day before! Listen and be amazed: From the isolation cell - probably the first person in human history to be allowed to make a private "courtesy call" from an isolation cell! That can't be - impossible! But the meaning became completely clear after just a few seconds, because his mother was downright delirious, completely drugged up with hallucinatory drugs, she couldn't utter a single meaningful sentence! The message was clear, get your mother out of the clutches of these bastards, it's the only way to save her! And then, the next day, quite by chance, the tempting, irresistible offer to wave 30,000 euros in cash under his nose and of course with the fresh memories of the "call for help, son, save me" phone call, which now made a whole new sense, he should at least accept the marriage offer for his mother's sake! Well, dear readers, the quick dismissal after the quick marriage is not that far-fetched, albeit in a different way than expected and with his feet first! Because then it would officially be time to inherit! They really are devils! Plans straight out of the handbook of the dark side of psychology! - The blank power of attorney with a gap: Another lawyer presented him with a power of attorney - the personal data at the top, the signature at the bottom, with a huge, suspicious gap in between that was just crying out to be filled with perfidious text afterwards. Here too: No signature! - The completely white sheet: The height of audacity - a third lawyer presented him with a completely white sheet of paper and asked him to sign at the bottom! The buyer got up and left. His experience: Lawyers are not to be trusted - "all gangsters who think they are particularly clever!" With such a power of attorney, the state gangsters could have enriched themselves massively - collecting his endless compensation claims from the NATO troop statute, selling the NATO countries in his name, concluding any contracts they wanted. Client betrayal included, and he should have paid for it! - Social welfare office: Extortion at Hartz IV level: Sign or starve! A true peak of perfidy! The unscrupulousness knew no bounds. Even when he was in dire need, they tried to force him to sign in blank. When he and his mother were homeless in Munich, living as a couple on around 1.50 euros a day and asked the authorities for money for food, the official in charge presented him with a blank sheet of paper: "Either sign and eat or don't sign and starve!" The official knew about their desperate situation - they had previously gone through their garbage (to see if they still had any Hero) and had long since lost their social benefits. They had to rely on soup kitchens, where the food was often spoiled and caused diarrhea and nausea. "So much for subsidies and donations to soup kitchens... they're all gangsters too, unscrupulously enriching themselves at the expense of the poorest." Although he had slimmed down to 65 kg, he refused: "I would rather starve to death than give in to such lousy blackmail!". We must never forget that anyone else in such a situation would have insisted on their "rights" and sued! But not him! Legal self-defense: Necessity is the mother of invention These experiences reinforced his mistrust. He knew that he was not allowed to give a lawyer power of attorney. That's why his motto became: "It's up to the man, only people study law, you can learn it yourself and then you don't have to rely on corrupt gangsters who pull the wool over your eyes, cooperate with the enemy and then present you with the bill!". Even if he had signed a power of attorney, it would have been invalid under his "criminal law", as there is no law regulating powers of attorney there. Under German law, however, it would have been valid and the damage would have been done. He suspects that he has long since been incapacitated several times anyway in order to be able to represent him. It is too tempting for the deep state to enrich itself in this way from the people's property. And there are also newspaper articles that claim this, but such guardianship proceedings were never served, i.e. carried out covertly, illegally! This absolute hardship and the knowledge that he could only expect betrayal from lawyers finally forced him onto the path of self-taught legal training. The hundreds of trials in which he represented himself thus inadvertently became his legal training. And it was only when he was well versed enough in German law that he came up with the ingenious idea of a self-awarded professorship in criminal law in order to legally circumvent the lawyer's duty. An ingenious trick that gave him the freedom to defend himself without selling his soul and his rights to corrupt lackeys of the system. Citizenship & private property in the Krzb. empire A brief addendum to his "state": In a state succession, citizens have the right to apply for new citizenship. So far, there are only two citizens of his kingdoms: Him and his mother. His private assets remain unaffected by the state succession - he is not a communist. All persons who lived or owned property in the affected areas on October 6, 1998 can apply for the new citizenship, keep their old citizenship or have more than one without their property being affected. Companies operating or wishing to remain in its "territory" must apply for an official registered office. For the future, he has devised the "Electric Technocracy" system of government, which has emerged from his experiences. His solution: technology replaces all politicians, civil servants and other civil servants. No political parties, no ideologies, no nation states, guaranteeing lasting peace. A universal basic income is financed by a technology tax. People are tax-free. This is the counter-concept to the plan of the NWO conspirators, the dividers who want conflict and have obviously been secretly preparing the Third World War for decades! But one thing is clear, you can be sent to war! Just say: "Nah, I won't do it!" If everyone does that, there will be no war! The battle is not over yet! This chapter shows the incredible resilience of a man fighting with his back to the wall against a seemingly all-powerful system. The methods of the Deep State are brutal and perfidious, but the will for truth and self-determination can unleash unimagined forces. The question remains: Will this David ever really be able to defeat the Goliath? Is the world watching? No. Or at least it should! World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98

Friends of freedom, welcome to the next and ultimate, harrowing climax of our revelatory odyssey through the dark abysses of the 1400/98 scroll! This is not the last chapter we have before us - a summary of horror, the realization of total hopelessness and at the same time the cemented, irreversible reality of a new world order in which one man alone sacrifices himself for the fate of the world! !! COILS OF WORLD BETRAYAL: THE WORLD IN ZOMBIE MODE - IRREVERSIBLY SOLD, ETERNALLY TRAPPED, FOREVER JUDGE !!! (SPECIAL REPORT - Succession 1400/98 - The Final Testament!) We have uncovered the lies, the manipulations, the legal pitfalls and the global implications of this diabolical contract. Now, in this part of the "buyer's" autobiography before us, we learn why the sale of the NATO states is triple-sealed, why there is no longer any rule of law for him, and how an inconspicuous clause on the place of jurisdiction cements his role as sole world judge - irrevocably! Sealed threefold: The irreversible sale of the NATO world! The Buyer summarizes why the sale of all NATO countries is an irrevocable fact, secured by three pillars of treason: - Sale of the networks: The tiny core area at Krzb. ZW-RLP was expanded to the total area of all former NATO countries through the co-sale of the connected networks (electricity, gas, telecommunications, etc.) - the infamous "Corfu border regulation case" sends its regards. - Sale of NATO rights: The NATO rights linked to the small area of origin (in particular the right to determine the boundaries of NATO properties!) were transferred to the entire territory of all former UN & NATO states through the expansion via net sale. The NATO Status of Forces now works against them! - Transfer of jurisdiction under international law: Absolute power over the legal interpretation of the entire matter rests with him. The consequence: Zombie states & a state of emergency for the buyer So everything was sold. However, since the states did not vacate their "sold" territories, they have been considered to have been annexed/occupied in violation of international law since October 6, 1998 - the possession was contradicted by state proclamation. For the buyer this means He has the "ass card", no more rules apply to him, the rule of law does not exist for him - because if the states would abide by the law, they would have to dissolve themselves! It's them or me!" (Me Against the World - song by 2Pac) He suddenly realized that he was questioning the existence of the Western world, paving the way for a NEW WORLD ORDER (NWO) and that he could not expect anyone to save him. Escape? No sense! Where to? He has overpowering enemies - everywhere! Quote: "Nowhere to run! Nowhere to hide! I can't get out of this number." The question of jurisdiction: HE has jurisdiction - forever! And who is now responsible under international law for this global super-GAU? The buyer's answer is short and devastating: "ME!" All German court judgments against him? Null and void! Because: - His jurisdiction extends over ALL sold territories (NATO-UN states) and the interpretation of the treaty. - All subjects of international law involved (NATO states) have recognized this jurisdiction. - As the sole sovereign and thus de facto absolutist monarch, he has personally been given the right to dispense justice - both internally and externally. - The place of jurisdiction named in the contract (§26: Landau in der Pfalz) is located in the sold territory and is therefore in his hands! Since the place of jurisdiction is bound to a place (no matter where on earth, as can be determined) and not to a contracting party (subject of international law), and he acquired sovereignty over this place (Landau) when the treaty was signed, he alone has jurisdiction. - As the later officially absolutist monarch of his self-founded kingdoms, he is king and judge in one person and can exercise his jurisdiction from any location - even from his "trouser pocket". A physical court building in Landau is not necessary. The lawsuit trap: A final warning! Once again, he emphasizes with all urgency: If he were to sue for the interpretation of the treaty in a German court, he would automatically and irrevocably transfer his own jurisdiction to Germany and give Germany "omnipotence"! That would NEVER happen, despite the enormous pressure and decades of damage aimed at doing just that. Defending himself in the countless lawsuits against him, on the other hand, was allowed without relinquishing jurisdiction. UNCHANGEABLE: The two-year deadline expired in 2000! And the final legal nail in the coffin: The two-year contestation period under international law for the State Succession Treaty 1400/98 expired on October 6, 2000! If the FRG or another (former) UN or NATO state had wanted to challenge the treaty, this would have had to be done within these two years before its personal court. During this time, the Dutch NATO troops were still present in the core area on the Krzb. - witnesses to the expiring deadline! NOT A SINGLE STATE raised an objection! All German court proceedings against it only began after this deadline and never challenged the international treaty itself. The treaty is therefore irrevocably valid! The end or the beginning of a new era? That is the end of the discussion of this part of the shocking autobiography. A man trapped in a reality he never wanted, endowed with a power he cannot exercise without losing it, and bound by a treaty that has turned the world order upside down - irrevocably. The world as we knew it no longer exists - at least not on the paper of this one fateful document. The World Succession Deed 1400/98 has spoken. The question is: is anyone listening now? Or only when the hammer of day X strikes and plunges the world into chaos? There is still time to turn back and settle EVERYTHING amicably, without war! But he and his mother - alone - are helplessly at the mercy of the NWO and the NWO is on a confrontation course with the world! Wouldn't a little help be in order? How about sharing this post for starters? World Sold - Welt verkauft - World Succession Deed 1400/98