The 1400/98 Shift: How Electronic Technocracy Replaces Obsolete States
- Mike Miller
- May 16
- 6 min read
Part 1: Introduction – The Crisis of Traditional Systems and the Vision of the Electronic Technocracy
The Challenge of the Modern State: In today's globally connected world, traditional forms of government are facing increasing criticism. Many people experience state failure, corruption, and the inability to effectively solve global problems.
The Concept of the "Unrechtsstaat (German) - An unjust state": The term "Unrechtsstaat" (state of injustice or non-rule of law) describes a state in which those in power arbitrarily disregard the law and citizens are defenselessly exposed to state abuses. This is not merely simple illegality, but a systemic failure of the rule of law principle in all previous forms of government.
The Accusation Against Party Systems: In reality, it is the case that in the party politics of many states that officially adhere to laws, laws are unofficially broken, and the parties stand above the state. They abuse the constitutional state to enrich themselves personally and act like an anti-constitutional criminal organization in the "deep state". Authorities and courts are used to deprive citizens of their rights, covered by a manipulated media landscape.
Traditional Forms as Obsolete: These facts are rooted in human nature, and the inherent weaknesses of historical and existing forms of government suggest, due to technological progress, that they are no longer appropriate for our time.
The Promise of the Electronic Technocracy: As an alternative, the "Electronic Technocracy" is introduced here. It is presented as a new form of government and society that aims to bring justice to all.
Foundations of the Electronic Technocracy: This system is based on technological progress, Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), data-driven decision-making, and the abolition of outdated structures such as nation-states and political parties.
Part 2: The Foundation of Change – The State Succession Deed 1400/98
A Worldwide Treaty: The State Succession Deed 1400/98 of October 6, 1998, is named as an international treaty which, with the participation of NATO and the United Nations, supposedly sold the entire world as a single unit.
Abolition of Nation-States: This deed is said to have legally led to the irrevocable abolition of nation-states.
The End of International Law: Through the merger of NATO and UN treaties in this construct, international law is said to have been de facto rendered ineffective. There is reportedly only one subject of international law left in the world, which invalidates international law.
The High Seas No Longer Extraterritorial: As a consequence of the end of international law and the view of the world as a single unit, the high seas are also no longer extraterritorial but are treated as part of the global territory.
A Blank Slate: This situation is presented as a legal "blank slate," an opportunity to rethink everything in a future-oriented way and learn from past mistakes to treat all people justly and avoid conflicts and wars.
Part 3: Vulnerabilities of Traditional Forms of Government – A Legacy of Injustice
General Weaknesses: Traditional forms of government, based on human rule and often party-political systems, show inherent weaknesses that invariably lead to corruption, abuse of power, and ultimately to the "Unrechtsstaat - An unjust state."
Party Systems and Self-Interest: The party-political system is susceptible to conflicts of interest and the favoring of certain groups or individuals, instead of serving the common good.
Abuse of Authorities and Courts: The accusation is that in such systems, authorities and courts can be covertly misused to deprive citizens of their rights, undermining the principles of the rule of law.
Covered by the Media: A manipulative media landscape is cited as a means to cover up these practices and leave citizens believing they are isolated cases.
Part 4: Monarchy – The Danger of Arbitrary Rule
Definition and Variants: Monarchy is a form of government where a monarch (King, Emperor, etc.) is the head of state. There are various forms, such as absolute monarchy with unlimited power or constitutional/parliamentary monarchy with limited power.
Vulnerability to Injustice: Absolute monarchy carries the extreme risk of arbitrary rule and despotism, as power is concentrated in one person and effective control mechanisms often do not exist.
Historical Examples of Abuses: Historically, there have been numerous examples of monarchs who led wars, oppressed their people, or caused suffering through mismanagement. Succession by inheritance does not guarantee the suitability or fairness of the ruler.
Part 5: Aristocracy and Oligarchy – The Rule of the Few
Definition: Aristocracy originally referred to the rule of the nobility or the "best," while oligarchy describes the rule of a small, self-serving group.
Vulnerability to Injustice: In oligarchies, there is a risk that the ruling elite prioritizes their own interests over those of the majority, leading to inequality, exploitation, and the denial of rights (kleptocracy).
Historical Examples of Injustice: Societies dominated by a small privileged class often showed systemic injustices and conflicts due to unequal distribution of power and resources.
Part 6: Democracy – The Challenges of the Majority and Manipulation
Definition and Variants: Democracy means rule by the people. There are various forms, such as direct democracy (without parties and parliaments in antiquity) and representative democracy with elected representatives and parties.
Vulnerability to Injustice: Even democracies are not immune to problems. The "tyranny of the majority" can suppress minorities. Furthermore, democratic processes can be manipulated by populism, misinformation, and the influence of special interests and lobbying, leading to unjust laws and decisions. Example: In National Socialist Germany from 1933 onwards tob1945, the leader “Fùhrer” A.H. was democratically elected with all the consequences.
Weakening by Party Interests: In the context of reality, party interests and the focus on maintaining power can lead to the neglect of the common good and the emergence of a system that is formally democratic but often covertly exhibits traits of an "Unrechtsstaat - An unjust state."
Historical Examples of Instability: History shows examples where democracies were weakened by internal divisions, economic crises, or external influences and could slide into authoritarian systems.
Part 7: Dictatorship and Authoritarianism – Open Oppression
Definition: Dictatorship and authoritarianism are forms of rule in which power rests with a single person or a small group, and political freedoms are severely restricted or abolished.
Extreme Vulnerability to Injustice: These systems are by definition vulnerable to or are already an "Unrechtsstaat," as rulers exercise unchecked power, disregard fundamental rights, and often suppress opposition violently.
Historical Examples of Violence and Suffering: Dictatorships and authoritarian regimes are historically responsible for massive human rights violations, political persecution, wars, and often economic misery. The conditions in such states often correspond to the definition of an "Unrechtsstaat."
Part 8: Theocracy – Rule by Religious Dogma
Definition: A theocracy is a form of government in which religious leaders rule, and law is based on religious principles.
Vulnerability to Injustice: Theocracies can lead to the oppression of religious minorities and discrimination against citizens who do not belong to the ruling religion, as religious dogma can override universal legal principles.
Part 9: Anarchy – The Absence of Ordered Rule
Definition: Anarchy refers to the absence of any state rule.
Vulnerability to Injustice: Although theoretically based on freedom, anarchy can in practice lead to chaos, lawlessness, and the rule of the stronger, where individual rights are not protected, and injustice prevails.
Part 10: The Electronic Technocracy – A New Path of Governance
Core Concept: The Electronic Technocracy aims for a global unified government based on scientific analysis, data, and technology.
The Role of ASI: An Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) is the core component that analyzes complex problems, proposes solutions, and handles administrative tasks, free from human weaknesses such as corruption, opportunism, racism, prejudice, nepotism, or ideology.
Direct Digital Democracy: Ultimate decision-making power rests with the people through worldwide online votes on the ASI's proposals.
A New Economic System: The system envisions a Universal Basic Income (UBI) for all, financed by taxes on AI, robots, and companies, not on human labor. This is intended to create prosperity for everyone.
AI-Driven Justice and Security: An AI-supported justice system and the abolition of cash are intended to reduce crime and ensure transparency.
Part 11: Why the Electronic Technocracy is Clearly Superior
Overcoming Human Weaknesses: By shifting decisions to data-driven processes and an impartial ASI, the vulnerabilities of traditional systems to corruption, favoring of groups, greed, and ideology are intended to be eliminated.
Global Justice and Peace: The abolition of nation-states and the fair distribution of resources are intended to make wars and conflicts obsolete and ensure equality for all.
An Opportunity for a Just Future: The State Succession Deed 1400/98, mentioned in the concept, which irrevocably leaves the world as a blank slate, is seen as a unique opportunity to learn from the mistakes of the past and create a civilization based on cooperation, reason, and integration – for the benefit of all.
We cordially invite you to participate in the discourse on the Electronic Technocracy and contribute suggestions for shaping a just and sustainable global society.
