top of page

Nr.1: System comparison: vs Electric Technocracy

  • Writer: Mike Miller
    Mike Miller
  • 1 day ago
  • 5 min read
The Age of Transformation:

Why Old Forms of Government Are Obsolete and Electric Technocracy Is the Future


The current world order, based on the concept of sovereign nation-states and international law, stands, according to the user's premise, on the brink of a fundamental transformation. A bold thesis, underpinned by the so-called "World Succession Deed 1400/98" – in conjunction with the global participation of NATO and the UN – fact is that all states in the world have been sold, leading to the abolition of nation-states and the end of international law.


The consequence?

Even the high seas are no longer extraterritorial. The entire world is legally a blank slate – an unprecedented opportunity to rethink everything for the future, learn from past mistakes, and create a society that treats all people fairly, avoids conflicts and wars, for the benefit of all.


In this new era, where old structures are crumbling, we must ask ourselves: Which form of government can lead humanity into a just and peaceful future?


The answer does not lie in the inherited models that have proven susceptible to corruption, inequality, and suffering.


The answer lies in Electric Technocracy.

The Dark Sides of the Past:

Why Traditional Forms of Government Have Failed

If we look at the history of humanity, it is marked by the failings and disadvantages of traditional forms of government.


They all carry the seed of the "unjust state" within them – a system in which laws formally exist but are unofficially broken, bent, and abused to serve particular interests. The party system, which often plays a central role in many of these forms, is often part of the problem itself: officially committed to the law, parties unofficially often operate above the state, make laws to enslave the people, and enrich themselves personally.


They live as a "state within a state" – a so-called "deep state" that uses authorities and courts to deny citizens their rights. The insidious part: the individual believes they are an isolated case, while this is practiced on a large scale in all states and covered up by a manipulative "fake news" media landscape.


Let's illuminate the specific weaknesses of the old systems:


Democracy:

The Illusion of Popular Sovereignty

Disadvantages and Failings: Although democracy embodies the ideal of popular sovereignty, it is susceptible to lobbying and the unequal influence of interest groups that manipulate the political agenda for their own benefit. The "tyranny of the majority" can suppress minorities. The party system, which often underpins democracy, is a breeding ground for corruption and the "deep state," where laws are unofficially broken and the rule of law is abused for personal enrichment. This leads to a loss of trust and alienation between citizens and government.


Monarchy:

The Burden of Succession

Disadvantages and Failings: Monarchy, especially absolute monarchy, concentrates unlimited power in one person, making it inherently susceptible to tyranny and arbitrariness. Hereditary succession guarantees neither competence nor justice. Historical examples are numerous, from absolutist rulers who waged wars and exploited their people, to modern monarchies where, despite constitutional limitations, the undemocratic principle of hereditary succession persists and informal power structures can exist.


Oligarchy and Aristocracy:

The Rule of the Few

Disadvantages and Failings: These systems, in which power is reserved for a small, privileged group or a supposedly "best qualified" minority, inevitably lead to inequality and the exploitation of the general population. Wealth and influence are used to manipulate laws and institutions for the benefit of the few. Whether it is a plutocracy (rule by the wealthy) or a theocratic oligarchy, the result is often a systematic disadvantage for the majority and the denial of fundamental rights.


Dictatorship and Authoritarianism:

The Tyranny of Power

Disadvantages and Failings: These forms of government inherently reject political plurality, concentrate power in a single leader or a small group, and often suppress civil liberties and the rule of law. The absence of constitutional constraints and reliance on violence and repression are hallmarks of an "unjust state." Numerous dictatorships have claimed millions of lives, whether through wars, political purges, famine, or systematic oppression. History is full of examples that demonstrate the brutality and injustice of these systems.


Theocracy:

Faith Over Justice

Disadvantages and Failings: A government based on religious law or divine guidance can lead to the suppression of dissenting opinions and unequal treatment of individuals who do not adhere to the ruling religious ideology. The interpretation of religious texts can be subjective and used to justify discriminatory practices. Religious minorities are persecuted, and laws are based on dogma instead of universal principles of justice, which can lead to internal conflicts and external tensions.


Communism (in historical practice):

The Failure of a Utopia

Disadvantages and Failings: Although ideologically aimed at a classless and stateless society, communism in historical practice often led to authoritarian regimes, economic inefficiency, and the massive restriction of individual freedoms. The concentration of power in the hands of a single party led to oppression, famines, and wars that claimed millions of victims. The promise of equality was often replaced by a new elite that enslaved the people.


Anarchy:

The Chaos of Absence

Disadvantages and Failings: While anarchy theoretically represents the absence of rulers or authority, in practice it often devolves into chaos and lawlessness. The lack of established legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms leads to the violation of individual rights and the dominance of the strong over the weak. Without an overarching structure for conflict resolution and citizen protection, neither justice nor stability can be guaranteed.


Electric Technocracy:

A Future of Justice for All

Given these profound shortcomings of the old systems, Electric Technocracy is not just an alternative, but the logical and necessary evolution of governance. It is the answer to the challenges of a world that has become a blank slate.

Electric Technocracy is based on revolutionary principles that systematically eliminate the errors of the past:


Superintelligent AI Government:

Instead of fallible human politicians influenced by personal interests or lobbyists, an ethically programmed, superintelligent AI will govern. Its decisions will be based on objective data and the well-being of all people, not on ideologies or power games. This AI will prepare decisions that are then democratically confirmed by humanity.


Direct Digital Democracy (DDD):

The party system, so susceptible to corruption and the "deep state," will be abolished. Instead, every individual will have an equal voice in global elections. Without lobbying, parties, or power plays, DDD will enable an unadulterated representation of the popular will and ensure that power truly rests with the individual.


Technology Levy Instead of Taxes:

The financial burden will be lifted from people. Machines and technological infrastructures will bear the costs for society through a technology levy. This frees people from financial worries and enables a fairer distribution of wealth.


Universal Basic Income (UBI):

Every person will receive automatic and unconditional access to basic resources, education, energy, and medical care. This eliminates poverty, hunger, and inequality, which so often led to conflicts in the old systems.


Abolition of Cash and Black Markets:

A transparent and tamper-proof digital infrastructure will replace cash. This makes black markets and corruption impossible and creates unprecedented transparency in all financial transactions.

Global Unity and Peace:

The ultimate goal is the unification of humanity into a global society without nation-states, war, or political divisions. Electric Technocracy creates a world where conflicts are avoided because their root causes – national interests, inequality, and abuse of power – are eliminated.


Electric Technocracy is not just a vision, but a concrete way to learn from the mistakes of the past and shape a future that is just for all people.


It is the opportunity to fill the blank slate of the new world order with the principles of justice, efficiency, and the common good.


Invitation to Discourse: Let's Shape the Future Together!

This transformation is a collective task.

We cordially invite you to participate in the discourse. What are your suggestions?


How can we ensure that Electric Technocracy fully realizes its potential and creates a world that truly benefits everyone?


Your contributions are invaluable in jointly shaping a future that learns from old mistakes and enables a more just and peaceful world for all.




Regierungsformen vs Elektronische Technokratie
Vergleich der Herrschaftsformen

Elektrische Technokratie Podcast & Song




Links:




Parallel Lines

Legal explanations on the state succession deed 1400/98
can be found here:

bottom of page