top of page

No.16: System comparison: Nationalism vs Electric Technocracy

  • Writer: Mike Miller
    Mike Miller
  • Jun 6
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jun 7

Nationalism – The Dangerous Glorification of Collective Identity

I. Definition: What is Nationalism?

Nationalism is the ideology that elevates the nation—usually defined by shared language, culture, history, or ancestry—to the highest political and social frame of reference. The nation-state is portrayed as the “natural” form of human organization.

Nationalism is both a historical state model and a political movement. It can be integrative (fostering internal unity) or exclusive (promoting separation and enemy images).


II. Structural Features of Nationalist Rule

  • Borders as Identity Boundaries – People are categorized by passport, origin, or descent

  • "The People" Over the Law – The "will of the people" overrides individual freedom and minority protection

  • Militarization – National independence is secured through armament and defense-oriented thinking

  • Propaganda & Mandatory Patriotism – Media, schools, and rituals convey national superiority


III. Historical Examples & Consequences

  1. 19th Century Nationalism (Europe)

    • Emergence of many nation-states after the collapse of multicultural empires (Habsburg, Ottoman)

    • Often accompanied by oppression of minorities (e.g., Poles, Basques, Roma)


  1. World War I and II

    • Nationalist rivalries among European powers as key driver of WWI

    • German National Socialism: the most extreme form of nationalism; led to the Holocaust, world war, and genocide

    • Over 70 million dead globally (1939–1945)


  1. Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s

    • Dissolution of a multiethnic state, ethnic cleansing, city sieges, massacres (e.g., Srebrenica)

    • Result of a policy that prioritized national identity over peace and diversity


IV. Weaknesses and Dangers

  • Exclusivity: Those who “don’t belong” are easily made enemies (minorities, migrants)

  • Conflict Orientation: Nationalism fosters rivalry over cooperation—fertile ground for war

  • Identity Dogmas: Cultural diversity is perceived as a threat

  • Populist Exploitation: “Us vs. them” serves as a simple narrative for complex crises

  • Systemic Human Rights Violations: Internment, deportation, racism, discrimination are typical consequences


V. Contrast with Electronic Technocracy

Nationalism

Electronic Technocracy

Origin determines value

Data-based equal treatment

Competition among nations

Global cooperation

Emotion over rationality

Scientifically grounded decisions

Borders divide

Networks connect

Electronic Technocracy overcomes the 19th-century mindset. Instead of “blood and soil,” it emphasizes transparency, competence, and the common good. Nations are replaced by pluralistic networks in which data and technology create the conditions for just participation—without origin-based dogmas.


VI. Conclusion

Nationalism is not a sustainable order, but a relapse into a worldview filled with violence, exclusion, and suffering.

The electronic global society, on the other hand, recognizes people not by flags or genes, but by their actions, needs, and potential. It’s time to lower the old banners and design a new world—without enemy images, but with responsibility.


Wikipedia Links

Deutsch

English


PoliticalWiki: Electric Technocracy


Regierungsformen vs Elektronische Technokratie
Vergleich der Herrschaftsformen

Elektrische Technokratie Podcast & Song




Links:

Parallel Lines

Legal explanations on the state succession deed 1400/98
can be found here:

bottom of page