The cost of the world? And how to buy it! Part 17
- Mike Miller
- 2 days ago
- 8 min read
Okay, friends of freedom, let's continue this dizzying journey through the abysses of the State Succession Treaty 1400/98.
In this chapter, the "buyer" summarizes his precarious situation:
Ruler of a world he does not control and trapped in a state that blocks any way out.
And he provides a final, devastating summary of why this treaty has irreversibly changed the world!
!! DETAILS OF THE IRREVERSIBLE WORLD BETRAYAL: TRAPPED ON THE WORLD THRONE - THE "BLACKMAILABLE STATE" & THE BUYER'S FINAL PLEA !!!
(SPECIAL REPORT - Succession Deed 1400/98 - No escape!)
1. we have followed the genesis, the mechanisms and the consequences of the diabolical world sale Deed 1400/98.
We have seen how an unsuspecting young man became an involuntary sovereign, how he was persecuted, dispossessed and driven to vigilante justice.
But what now? Can he somehow turn his "empire" into money? Can he escape?
The answer is a clear, shocking NO!
He is in a "blackmailable state" that makes any action under international law impossible.
The "blackmailable state":
Caught between law and reality
In order to even reach a state in which he could sell on his acquired rights (and the territories associated with them) cleanly under international law, he must not be susceptible to blackmail.
This means that the original treaty would have to be fulfilled in full and the decades of damage to his person would have to be ended and fully dealt with.
2 What this means in concrete terms sounds like the script for the end of the world:
A. Exodus of the world's population:
All "non-citizens" of his kingdoms (i.e. almost 8 billion people!) would have to leave the sold territories (all UN & NATO states), as they have no right of residence. Only then would he no longer be susceptible to blackmail.
His own assessment: "This is totally insane!".
B. Mass naturalization:
Alternatively, all residents of NATO territories would have to apply for his citizenship. "Just as implausible!".
C. Withdrawal of the old states:
The selling states (FRG, all NATO & UN states etc.) would have to vacate the territories and stop exercising sovereignty there.
??? Never voluntarily!!!
D. Rehabilitation and reparation:
The damage to his person should be completely dealt with and ended.
a) Unlawful press incitement: The deliberate dissemination of false or distorted information by the media in order to defame the buyer must be dealt with. This must be rectified and may be relevant under criminal law, for example as defamation or libel.
b) Criminal prosecution: The unlawful or abusive use of criminal measures against the buyer and his mother, often with the aim of political or personal oppression. The same applies to coercive psychological measures such as forced care.
c) Secret service persecution (methods of subversion): Methods used by intelligence services to destabilize, discredit or isolate the buyer and his mother. This was particularly practiced in authoritarian regimes such as the GDR. When the GDR was reunified with the NRD, no reappraisal took place, but this time it is unavoidable.
d) Illegal detention and torture: The unlawful detention and ill-treatment of the buyer and his mother without legal basis or in violation of international human rights standards.
e) Illegal forced sale: The forced sale of property in violation of the law, as a means of economic or political repression, particularly severe as it took place in foreign sovereign territory and was clearly a covert war of aggression. Demolition and conversion resulted in a legal situation that can be equated with bombing.
f) Responsibility under international criminal law in the event of harm to a foreign head of state: If an offense is committed against a foreign head of state and no prosecution is brought within the 10-year period, responsibility can be transferred to those politically responsible. This applies in particular to serious human rights violations and crimes against humanity.
g) Continued control by the former state: state succession (after land sale)
A sale of land under an international treaty leads to state succession within the meaning of international law. The new state assumes sovereignty over the territory, including sovereign functions, administration and jurisdiction. As a rule, the population receives new nationality and there is a complete transfer of rights and obligations to the successor state.
If the ceding state does not vacate the territory and continues to exercise de facto control, even though succession is effective under international law, this constitutes a form of illegal occupation. This constitutes a violation of the territorial integrity of the new state and is contrary to international law under Art. 2 No. 4 of the UN Charter.
h) Unlawful acts of sovereignty
All acts by organs of the old state in the territory taken over are deemed to be contrary to international law.
These include:
Laws and administrative acts: Void, as there is no longer any sovereign power.
Court judgments: Illegal as there is no lawful jurisdiction.
Criminal prosecution & imprisonment: Any imprisonment is to be considered a deprivation of liberty; detention centers are illegal facilities on foreign territory.
Psychiatric placement: Also unlawful due to lack of legitimate state authority.
In this case, not only the perpetrators, but in particular the political and administrative leadership are liable under international criminal law, as systematic human rights violations may be involved.
Liability is based on the principle of command responsibility (Art. 28 Rome Statute).
i) State revenue & expenditure
All state revenues and expenditures, including taxes, fines, coercive measures or subsidies, are illegally obtained and constitute financial losses for the successor state. These can be the basis for compensation claims or reparation payments, which, however, are far exceeded by the unlimited right to compensation conferred by the NATO Status of Forces!
j) Educational qualifications & institutions
As the old state no longer has jurisdiction, all qualifications awarded by it are no longer valid:
School qualifications
Vocational and university degrees
Licenses & certificates
To be considered invalid or at least internationally contestable. Until they have been officially recognized by the buyer, they are completely worthless!
The exercise of sovereign activities by e.g. police, bailiffs, citizens' offices or job centers is also illegal, comparable to the unauthorized exercise of public authority.
k) State-owned real estate & facilities
All state-owned real estate, such as courts, prisons, schools and administrative buildings, must be vacated immediately upon transfer of ownership to the successor state. Entry or further use by the former state or its officials constitutes:
Trespassing
Possibly hostage-taking in office (in the case of deprivation of liberty, e.g. in prison)
And, on a large scale, systematic oppression.
l) Coercive measures under illegitimate administration
If an illegitimate administration detains or treats people under state authority, this constitutes unlawful deprivation of liberty.
This is aggravated by the nature of the measures:
1. forced medication: violations of human dignity and the right to physical integrity (Art. 7 & 10 ICCPR, Art. 3 ECHR).
2. permanent isolation & long-term fixation: can be qualified as torture or inhuman treatment (Art. 1 UN Convention against Torture).
3. covert medication, drug administration, feigning criminal offenses: Violation of medical ethics, possibly even human experimentation (Art. 7 of the Rome Statute = war crimes or crimes against humanity).
4. life imprisonment without a fair trial: Deprivation of the right to liberty and fair trial (Art. 14 ICCPR, Art. 6 ECHR).
m) Persons with state immunity or diplomatic status (CD)
Diplomatic protection under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) prohibits any form of deprivation of liberty, coercive measures or criminal prosecution against accredited diplomats or heads of state.
Such action against persons with immunity is a blatant violation of international law.
Consequences:
International responsibility of the practicing state.
Possibility of legal action.
Prosecution of those responsible under international criminal law for unlawful detention, torture, attack on the personal freedom and dignity of diplomatically protected persons.
n) Gerichtsurteile gegen Personen unter Immunität oder auf Basis unrechtmäßiger Zuständigkeit
If under an illegal administration:
Heads of state, diplomats or citizens of the successor state
Are under forced supervision or unlawful detention
And legal proceedings result from this
Then all court judgments are to be considered null and void because
No lawful jurisdiction exists (lack of sovereignty).
The defendant is protected by immunity (immunity under international law = absolute bar).
The proceedings were brought about by unlawful deprivation of liberty or care (violation of the fair trial principle).
Legal consequences:
Judgments are null and void under international law.
Those responsible (judges, supervisors, officials) can be prosecuted individually (Rome Statute, Art. 7 - crimes against humanity, Art. 8 - war crimes, possibly Art. 27 - no immunity for public officials in proceedings).
o) International criminal liability - offenses relevant under international criminal law
The following acts are potentially subject to the jurisdiction of the international ad hoc tribunals in accordance with Instrument of State Succession 1400/98:
Arbitrary detention
Forced psychiatrization and medication
Torture and cruel treatment
Persecution on political grounds
Abduction and incommunicado detention
Crimes against humanity in systematic proceedings
p) Consequences & sanctions
In practice, such a continued unlawful claim to rule despite state succession leads to:
1. International non-recognition of the old government in the new territory.
2. Liability under international law of the old state and its decision-makers.
3. Right to compensation for all natural and legal persons affected.
4. Possibility of recourse to the international court pursuant to World Succession Deed 1400/98
E. Voluntariness:
A future sale would have to be absolutely voluntary, after termination and, among other things, after (criminal) investigation of the unlawful acts and without bribery.
In short:
The conditions for a "willing to sell" state are the de facto dissolution of the existing world order.
As long as the (former) UN-NATO states keep the territories annexed in violation of international law and put him under personal pressure, he is trapped.
Why the original deed of succession 1400/98 IS a treaty under international law - The final plea
For the avoidance of doubt, the buyer once again summarizes the core arguments as to why Deed of Succession 1400/98 is a State Succession Deed (a State Succession Treaty under international law) and not a simple real estate deed:
- Multilateral & subjects of international law: It was a multilateral treaty that required the consent of several subjects of international law. The consent of NATO as a whole was given by the consent of the Dutch armed forces, which were stationed on the Kreuzberg as NATO troops under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement and had rights and obligations under the treaty. The naming of the Dutch armed forces (29 times!) and the Kingdom of the Netherlands (2 times!) proves their participation and the character under international law. Their behavior in accordance with the treaty (the later handover of the territory) was the confirmation. The necessity of the consent of the FRG, the Netherlands and NATO establishes the treaty in international law.
- Sale of territory with sovereign rights: It was about a territory (the extraterritorial Kreuzberg area, which was never really part of the FRG). The territory was sold "with all rights (above all NATO rights and sovereign rights), obligations and components" (including the globally expanding networks).
The sale of all rights and obligations is typical for a state succession and is the basis for the transfer of sovereign rights.
- Buyer = natural person:
The buyer was a natural person who is automatically accredited by such a treaty as the bearer of rights and obligations under international law and ascends to the status of sovereign of the territory with CD status.
- Modification of international law by international law:
The treaty had to refer to the existing transfer relationship under international law between Germany and the Netherlands (§2 II: "...remains unaffected by this treaty."). Only a treaty under international law can affect or amend another. This reference is clear evidence of the international law nature of the new treaty. The subsequent settlement of the old relationship was the recognition of the new treaty. This activates the treaty chain, as the treaty acts as a supplement to the NATO Status of Forces Agreement.
The bitter reality: legal king, de facto hostage for life
The buyer's legal conclusion is clear:
The treaty is valid, the succession of states has taken place, he is the sovereign.
But the reality is different:
The old powers ignore the treaty, continue to occupy "his" territory and illegally exercise sovereignty there.
He is the rightful ruler of a world that does not obey him, trapped in a "blackmailable state" that renders him incapable of acting.
The question echoes through the room one last time: How can this stalemate be resolved?
And at what cost?
The world order is on a knife's edge!
