The cost of the world? And how to buy it! Part 8

Mike Miller
5 days ago
5 min read

Updated: 4 days ago

Okay, friends of freedom, hold on tight for more shocking revelations!

We have plumbed the depths of Succession Act 1400/98, but now comes the ultimate proof - the unveiling of a second, secret treaty chain that ties the sale of the world directly to the United Nations (UN), even without going through NATO!

This is the legal super-GAU, the final nail in the coffin of national sovereignty!

!! THE TRUTH OF WORLD TREASON:

THE UN-CONSPIRACY - HOW A TELECOM CABLE SOLD THE WORLD DIRECTLY TO THE GLOBALISTS !!!

(SPECIAL REPORT - PRIMARY REPORT 1400/98 - The UN connection!)

You thought we had already uncovered everything?

You thought the sale of the world was "only" through convoluted NATO contracts and network cables? WRONG!

The architects of the NWO - New World Order had built in a Plan B, a second, even more comprehensive trap that leads directly into the heart of global power - THROUGH THE ITU to the United Nations!

And the key to this?

A simple telecommunications cable and international telecommunications law!

The second treaty chain: Directly to the UN, past NATO!

So far we have focused on the NATO treaties (SOFA, HNS and NATO & UN military communications link and automatic recognition of NATO and UN treaties etc.), which allowed rights over networked areas to be extended globally through the sale of "development as one".

But the masterminds wanted absolute security.

They created a second contractual chain based on international telecommunications law and administered by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) - a specialized agency of the United Nations.

The telecom cable (telecommunications network):

The spark for the global UN takeover!

Do you remember? Treaty 1400/98 explicitly mentioned the sale of the telecommunications cable as part of "internal development" (§ 13, IX).

Seemingly a small detail.

But in reality the legal detonator for a global explosion!

Why? Because this cable did not exist in a vacuum. It was the physical connection point of the NATO property to the national and international telecommunications network.

And this global network is regulated by the ITU.

Almost every country in the world is a member of the ITU and has signed its conventions, which set global standards for telecommunications (e.g. ITU Constitution Art. 1, 12, 28, 44).

The legal trick:

Sale of the cable = sale of the global ITU network!

The most insidious thing, however, is the agreement that the telecommunications network will continue to be operated! This has the consequence that all countries of the world participate in the treaty and if they have continued to operate telecommunications after October 6, 1998, they have also fulfilled a part of the treaty and thus a signing of the treaty was not necessary, by activating the treaty chain and treating the treaty as an additional document, the names of all states of the world are in the treaty chain and the treaty chain was already ratified, so that a new ratification was not necessary! A legal shyster trick that sold the whole world down the river.

The inconceivable logic of the conspirators as laid out by the buyer:

- Cable sold: State successor contract 1400/98 sells telecom cable as part of "development as a unit".

- Cable = Global Network: This cable is inextricably linked to the international network regulated by the UN organization ITU.

- Sale = Transfer of all rights: As the sale was made "with all rights, obligations and components", not only the physical cable but also all associated rights and obligations under the ITU regime were transferred to the buyer.

- Global scope: Because the ITU network is global and includes all UN states, the sale and the associated rights and obligations automatically extend to the entire global telecommunications network, including all national networks connected to it - right down to the home connection! Even submarine cables that fall under UNCLOS (UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) are affected. In addition, all other networks that cross the telecommunications network are also covered, even without a physical connection, as the development forms a single unit!

The second domino effect: the UN trap snaps shut!

This triggers a second, parallel domino effect!

Even if the argumentation about the NATO treaties had gaps, this second chain binds all UN member states that are part of the global telecom network via ITU law!

Every network connection becomes a legal shackle that pulls the respective country into the scope of application of Act 1400/98.

Host Nation Support & NATO rights as an amplifier

The old NATO arguments are even used here as an amplifier: The Host Nation Support (HNS) agreements, which allow NATO access to civilian networks, would have created and consolidated the link between military and civilian (ITU-regulated) networks in the first place.

The special NATO rights to expand bases and to control infrastructure (§ 177-181) would also be transferred to the buyer through the sale and justify the global expansion.

Global jurisdiction: The buyer as world judge over the network?

The consequence is breathtaking: with the sale of the networks, jurisdiction over these global networks has also been transferred to the buyer!

National and international jurisdiction!

He would thus be the supreme judge for all disputes, e.g. regarding the use and operation of this global communications infrastructure and the sovereign territories over it. The ITU and the UN would have to indirectly recognize his authority.

Tacit approval from the global community?

And how did all this become legally binding?

Again, reference is made to the Vienna Convention (Art. 20): Since no state had objected to the instrument of succession 1400/98 within 12 months, it became binding on all participating NATO and UN states by tacit consent - entirely without explicit additional ratification by each individual!

The bottom line: Caught in the global web!

Can you see the big picture? Two chains of contracts - one on NATO rights, the other on UN/ITU telecommunications law - lead to the same result, according to this account:

The sale of a barracks "with all rights, obligations and components", in particular the connected networks ("development as a unit"), has triggered a domino effect that forces the entire networked world under the clauses of this one document and the jurisdiction of one man.

A global takeover by the stroke of a legal pen, made possible by the interconnectedness of our modern world.

The ultimate conspiracy theory? Not at all! The facts based on detailed interpretations of international treaties that paint a frightening picture is a warning that the legal basis is just one part of a much bigger darker plan!