The cost of the world? And how to buy it! Part 6
- Mike Miller
- 5 days ago
- 5 min read
Okay, friends of freedom, prepare for the coming bang!
This is the next installment in our investigative series on File 1400/98 - the contract that sold the world. Now we dive deep into the legal pitfalls and the almost unbelievable reasoning behind how entire continents changed hands through the sale of heating pipes and network cables.
Hold on tight, the truth is more bizarre and frightening than you could ever have imagined!
!! THE STORY OF WORLD BETRAYAL:
THE PROOF IN THE SMALL PRINT - HOW HEATING PIPES & NETWORK CABLES TOOK OVER THE WORLD (THE DOMINO EFFECT!) !!!
(SPECIAL REPORT - The 1400/98 File - The Shocking Finale!)
We have addressed the manipulations, the surveillance, the legal tricks.
We know that the unsuspecting "buyer" was made the sole beneficiary of a global conspiracy.
But how exactly did the sale of a small barracks in Germany turn into the sale of all NATO and UN states?
The answer lies in the small print of the "international legal document 1400/98" itself and in the diabolically ingenious use of the term "development"!
The evidence in the text of the contract:
More than just a real estate deal!
Let's look at the key passages that prove that this was an international treaty with global implications from the very beginning:
The treaty explicitly mentions that part of the property (71 housing units) is still "ceded to the Dutch armed forces in return for payment under international law".
This proves that NATO (represented by the Netherlands) had to agree and that the treaty itself has the character of international law, as it changes an existing relationship under international law.
For example, the subjects of international law were granted the right to remain in the property for an indefinite period, although it was agreed that they would vacate the property within the next two years and that the telecommunications network sold would continue to be operated, etc.
The subsequent voluntary handover by the Dutch, for example, was the fulfillment in accordance with the contract. There were no standard land transfers across government borders, so this sale had to be made under international law.
- §2 II: Existing agreement "unaffected": The treaty states that the "transfer relationship under international law" between Germany and the Netherlands remains "unaffected". Proof again! Only a treaty under international law can "affect" or leave "unaffected" another treaty. This clause allowed the Dutch to stay for up to two years while the treaty was still in force. At the same time, this reference made the entire NATO Status of Forces Agreement, with all its rights and obligations, part of the new treaty and the treaty became a supplement to the SOFA.
- §2 III & following: Settlement & Sovereign Rights: The Treaty stipulates that the Federation (Germany) still settles the old transfer relationship. As the new agreement was concluded before this settlement, some rights were transferred to the buyer immediately and some later. The sovereign rights over the Dutch part remained with the Netherlands/NATO until the final handover and were then transferred to it via the FRG.
BUT: NATO rights for all other territories ARE immediately extended and transferred by the treaty! All subjects of international law involved had all rights and obligations under international law regarding the entire subject matter of the treaty transferred to him.
The key to the world sale:
"development as a unit" & the domino effect!
And how did the barracks become the world?
By selling the "development" - all connected networks and lines - which, according to the contract, "form a single unit"!
If a network that is also sold leaves the core area in a deed of state succession, the territory sold expands in line with the extent of the network and the contracting parties involved (here: UN & NATO).
Example 1: The district heating network - The first domino
- The contract mentions the sale of "all development facilities" and specifically the "heating lines" (§4). Since the buyer (after TASC dropped out) became the sole purchaser of all development facilities, including the heating lines, and these lines supplied not only the housing estate but also the upper part of the former US barracks (now a university, business park with 8,000 workplaces), its territory had already been extended beyond the core area as a result.
Every plot of land touched by these pipelines is now part of its territory.
Example 2: The gas network - from heating to global pipeline?
- According to the contract, the heating system had to be converted to gas (§4 VII). To this end, it was connected to the public gas network. Since the heating center and its pipelines belong to him and the development "forms a unit", this connection made the ENTIRE gas network - including long-distance gas pipelines up to the house connections of the end consumers in all NATO countries that are somehow connected to this network - part of the object of purchase!
- Another massive, virtually infinite expansion of territory!
- Since the entire development network forms a single unit, other networks that cross the long-distance gas network are also affected by the domino effect of the territorial expansion.
Example 3: The student union agreement - even more networks!
- The agreement transfers to the buyer "all rights with regard to the development facilities" from an earlier agreement between the federal government and the Studentenwerk for neighboring properties (§4 VIII). The buyer receives "rights" here as ownership of all lines there: Electricity, water, heating, street lighting, a 20KV ring line (which is excluded elsewhere, but included here again!), water pumping stations, heating systems and all other networks in this area. Its territory thus also extends along these networks coming from outside the core area, and from there further through all UN & NATO areas, wherever there is a direct or indirect connection back to the barracks.
Conclusion: The domino effect - from network to network, from country to country!
That is the core logic of selling the world:
The barracks were just the spark. Through the sale "with all rights and obligations" and above all the "development as a unit", which included various networks (heating, gas, electricity, water, telecommunications, etc.) extending far beyond the core area, the sold territory jumped like a DOMINO EFFECT from network to network, from country to country, until it covered all the territories of the parties to the contract (NATO states and, through the UN connection, beyond)!
A tiny core area, extended by kilometers of cables and global networks, transmitted by a legally sophisticated international treaty, signed by a clueless man, ratified by politicians in the know - that is the shocking story that emerges from these documents.
A story of inconceivable fraud, of greed for power and the legal reality of a sold world under the rule of a man who wanted none of it and has been persecuted for it for decades.
The evidence is on the table! The question remains: What is the truth behind the 1400/98 file?
