top of page

No.39: System comparison: anarcho-capitalism vs Electric Technocracy

  • Writer: Mike Miller
    Mike Miller
  • Jun 6
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jun 7

Anarcho-Capitalism – Freedom to the Point of Abolishing Law

I. Definition: What is Anarcho-Capitalism?

Anarcho-capitalism is a radical form of libertarianism that rejects all state intervention and seeks to regulate all social relations through free markets—including policing, justice, security, and infrastructure. The state is viewed as unnecessary or even illegitimate coercion. In its place, competition and private property are expected to organize everything.


II. Core Features

  • Privatization of all public goods: Education, security, judiciary, and transportation become services in the free market

  • Absolute individualism: The individual is solely responsible for their actions and survival

  • Contract instead of constitution: Private contracts replace laws and human rights

  • No central authority: No overarching instance to protect the vulnerable or mediate conflicts


III. Critical Weaknesses

  1. Power Through Wealth – Not Justice

    • Without collective rules, those with the most capital win. Justice becomes purchasable, social safety nets vanish

  2. Law Becomes a Commodity

    • When private security firms decide over life and death, basic rights become negotiable—whoever pays, decides


  3. No Protection for the Weak

    • Children, the elderly, the sick, and the poor lose any chance of participation in the “voluntary” market. Solidarity becomes an optional, rarely chosen service


  4. Fragmentation and Chaos

    • If everyone buys their own “legal system,” no shared norms remain. Multiple power centers arise, undermining stability


IV. Historical and Practical Examples

  • Somalia in the 1990s: After state collapse, pseudo-anarcho-capitalist structures emerged—private militias, extortion systems, no public law

  • Privatized city projects like “Prospera” in Honduras: Experiments with stateless legal zones face heavy criticism for lacking transparency and accountability

  • Silicon Valley ideologues: Investors like Peter Thiel promote “seasteading”—floating states free from national and international law


V. Comparison to Electronic Technocracy

Anarcho-Capitalism

Electronic Technocracy

Law through wealth and power

Law through transparent, data-based ethics

No collective responsibility

Solidarity algorithms for justice

Power of the wealthy

Balance through digital participation

Systemic insecurity

Systemic stability through computational logic

VI. Conclusion

Anarcho-capitalism is not a vision of freedom, but a regression to the law of the strongest—masked by neoliberal rhetoric. It is the logical endpoint of a system in which humans are reduced to consumers. Without collective values, without social feedback—there is no future.

In contrast, Electronic Technocracy offers a reordering of the world that algorithmically balances both freedom and justice—not through profit, but through a logic of the common good.


Wikipedia Links

Deutsch


English


PoliticalWiki: Electric Technocracy


Regierungsformen vs Elektronische Technokratie
Vergleich der Herrschaftsformen

Elektrische Technokratie Podcast & Song




Links:

Parallel Lines

Legal explanations on the state succession deed 1400/98
can be found here:

bottom of page