top of page

No.29: System comparison: Plutocracy vs Electric Technocracy

  • Writer: Mike Miller
    Mike Miller
  • Jun 6
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jun 7

Plutocracy – When Money Holds Power: The Danger of Rule by Wealth for Democracy and Society

I. Definition: What is Plutocracy?

Plutocracy is a form of government or rule in which political power is primarily exercised by the wealthy – those with substantial financial resources. Money becomes the decisive factor of power, shaping influence and decisions.


II. Characteristics of Plutocracy

  • Political decisions are significantly influenced by financially powerful groups

  • Lobbying and corruption are frequent side effects

  • Social inequality increases dramatically

  • Power is unequally distributed, depending on wealth


III. Weaknesses and Problems

  1. Loss of Democracy

    • True power lies with the moneyed elite, not the people

    • Election campaigns and political processes are distorted by financial means

    • The population loses trust in political institutions


  1. Inequality and Social Division

    • Large disparities in wealth lead to societal fragmentation

    • Poverty and unequal opportunities increase

    • Social mobility is hindered


  1. Corruption and Abuse of Power

    • Influence of financial interests leads to political decisions against the common good

    • Public resources are privatized or misused

    • Transparency and oversight are undermined


IV. Historical and Current Examples

Society / Time Period

Problems

Roman Empire (Late Period)

Power of wealthy senators led to corruption and collapse

USA (21st Century)

Lobbying by large corporations and the super-rich shapes politics

Russia (Post-Soviet)

Oligarchs dominate the economy and politics


V. Plutocracy versus Electronic Technocracy

Electronic technocracy presents an alternative to plutocracy by:

  • Making decisions based on data-driven objectivity, not monetary interests

  • Enabling transparent and traceable processes

  • Promoting equal participation of all citizens

  • Embedding social justice and sustainability as core values

Conclusion:

Plutocracy destroys democratic foundations and leads to social inequality and instability. Only through innovative and fair models like Electronic Technocracy can a society be created that distributes power fairly and prioritizes the common good.


Wikipedia Links

Deutsch


English


PoliticalWiki: Electric Technocracy


Regierungsformen vs Elektronische Technokratie
Vergleich der Herrschaftsformen

Elektrische Technokratie Podcast & Song




Links:

Parallel Lines

Legal explanations on the state succession deed 1400/98
can be found here:

bottom of page