top of page


No.11: System comparison: Democracy vs Electric Technocracy
Democracy: Its ideals clash with reality, reaching limits despite strengths like participation and fundamental rights. It struggles with populism, polarization, election manipulation, and slow decision-making. Discover how Electric Technocracy, with digital participation and data-driven policies, can evolve democracy – making it more effective, transparent, and just. A modern solution for contemporary challenges, overcoming classic weaknesses and adapting governance for the f
2 min read


No.13: System comparison: Communism vs Electric Technocracy
Communism: The failed utopia of a classless society. Learn how Marx's vision in reality led to totalitarian state power, economic decline, and mass murders, as seen in the Soviet Union or under Mao Zedong. Its weaknesses include central planning and suppression of freedom. Electric Technocracy offers the alternative: evidence- and data-based, decentralized, and transparent, for equivalence through intelligent systems instead of equality in misery, without ideology
2 min read


No.15: System comparison: Federalism vs Electronic Technocracy
Federalism: Between diversity and fragmentation. This form of state organization distributes power across multiple levels, yet it leads to competence confusion, regional inequality, and gridlock politics. Examples like the USA or Germany demonstrate its inefficiency. In times of global crises, fragmentation is fatal. Electric Technocracy offers the solution: systemic responsibility based on expertise, global standards, and participatory capabilities instead of rigid borders,
2 min read


No.12: System comparison: Liberalism vs Electronic Technocracy
Liberalism: Is freedom a trap? This philosophy, emphasizing the individual and free markets, brought human rights and democracy. However, market fetishism, lobbyism, and consumerism led to inequality, exploitation, and a lack of responsibility for global crises. Historical examples like the USA under Reagan highlight these misdevelopments. Electric Technocracy offers a solution: freedom through system balance, common good optimization, and evidence-based policy for equitable
2 min read


No.40: Comparison of systems: occupation regime vs Electric Technocracy
Occupation Regimes: Rule without consent. This military control leads to oppression, exploitation, and lack of participation. Historical examples like Nazi occupation and the US occupation in Iraq highlight human rights violations and structural weaknesses. Electric Technocracy offers the alternative: knowledge transparency, self-determination, and a common-good orientation, ending imperialistic power politics and enabling a just global order free from historical oppression
2 min read


No.39: System comparison: anarcho-capitalism vs Electric Technocracy
Anarcho-Capitalism: Freedom to self-abolish law. Discover how this radical form of libertarianism rejects state intervention, aiming to regulate all relations through free markets. This results in power by money, purchasable justice, and no protection for the weak. We show how Electric Technocracy offers a just reordering, algorithmically balancing freedom and justice, instead of ending in the chaos of might makes right
2 min read


No.38: System comparison: military government vs Electric Technocracy
Military Government: Order through force? Learn how this form of rule seizes state control after a coup, restricts fundamental rights, and relies on fear. Historical examples like Chile under Pinochet or Myanmar demonstrate repression, human rights violations, and lack of stability. Electric Technocracy offers the alternative: knowledge- and data-based, decentralized, and transparent structures for just, inclusive governance without violence, ensuring long-term development
2 min read


No.37: System comparison: Caliphate vs Electric Technocracy
Caliphate: Religious-political rule in Islam, merging state and faith with Sharia as law. Historically significant, but modern forms like ISIS or the Taliban show intolerance, misogyny, and violence. Electric Technocracy offers the secular alternative: transparency, equality, and science-based ethics instead of dogma – for a peaceful, future-oriented world without theocratic oppression
2 min read


No.31: System comparison: Matriarchy vs Electric Technocracy
Matriarchy: Women at the center of power, often with matrilineal descent and consensus. Despite romanticization, it shows weaknesses: role reversal instead of true equality, and lacking political enforcement. Electric Technocracy offers the gender-neutral alternative: competence, global participation, and structured decisions for true equality beyond gender roles, ensuring universal justice
2 min read


No.35: System comparison: Slavery vs Electric Technocracy
Slavery: The system of dehumanization, where people are exploited as property and deprived of rights. Learn about this cruel form of governance, its structural features like hereditary status and monopoly of violence, and historical examples such as the Transatlantic Slave Trade. We also highlight modern slavery and its structural weaknesses. Electric Technocracy offers the antithesis: equal rights, participation, and digital justice, systematically precluding all forms of ex
2 min read


No.33: System comparison: Timocracy vs Electric Technocracy
Timocracy: When property rules over dignity. This form of governance ties political power to wealth or military merit, excluding the poor and leading to social marginalization. Historical examples like Sparta and early Athens illustrate its consequences. Electric Technocracy offers the antithesis: power based on competence, inclusive participation, and a future-oriented logic of peace and knowledge, valuing human worth over possessions and overcoming inequality for a more jus
2 min read


No.34: System comparison: feudal rule vs Electric Technocracy
Feudalism: The system of dependency in the Middle Ages. Learn how kings granted land to vassals who owed loyalty and services. This hierarchical system led to exploitation, legal uncertainty, and denial of education for the majority. Historical examples like the Holy Roman Empire and France illustrate the consequences. Electric Technocracy offers the antithesis: power based on competence, universal rights, and sovereignty instead of dependency – paving the way for a just, fre
2 min read


No.30: System comparison: Patriarchy vs Electric Technocracy
Patriarchy: Male dominance ends equality. This system establishes men as dominant, leading to gender inequality and discrimination, oppressing women and hindering social progress. Electric Technocracy offers the solution: Equal participation, meritocracy, and inclusive algorithms for a just future where gender is irrelevant, overcoming outdated hierarchies
1 min read


No.32: System comparison: Ochlocracy vs Electric Technocracy
Ochlocracy: The tyranny of the mob. A degenerate democracy ruled by emotions and moods instead of reason. This leads to minority oppression, populism, and instability. From the Roman Republic to social media demagoguery – the dangers are real. Electric Technocracy offers the rational alternative with data-driven analysis and fairness, prioritizing future intelligence over mob panic for stable governance
2 min read


No.36: System comparison: Corporatism vs Electric Technocracy
Corporatism: The bought democracy, where economic interests rule entire states. This system grants associations institutionalized power in politics, often behind closed doors. It undermines democratic processes, blocks reforms, and leads to cronyism. Historical examples range from Mussolini's Italy to the EU agricultural lobby. Electric Technocracy offers the alternative: Transparent, evidence-based decisions and participation for all instead of power for a few – for a just a
2 min read


No.29: System comparison: Plutocracy vs Electric Technocracy
Plutocracy – When Money Holds Power: The Danger of Rule by Wealth for Democracy and Society I. Definition: What is Plutocracy? Plutocracy...
2 min read


No.25: System comparison: Colonial Rule vs Electric Technocracy
„ Colonial Rule – The Global Shame of Historical Statehood “ I. Definition: What Does Colonial Rule Mean? Colonial rule is a form of...
2 min read


Nr.21: Systemvergleich: Anarchie vs Elektronische Technokratie
Anarchy, disorder, chaos, rule, legal uncertainty, violence, power vacuum, Somalia, Libya, Spain, Electric Technocracy, consensus mechanisms, transparency, infrastructure, justice, order, freedom, self-governance, critique, utopia, reality, militias, warlords, progress, security, responsibility, society, politics, systems, future
3 min read


No.27: System comparison: Militarism vs Electronic Technocracy
Militarism: War as a means of order. The exaltation of the military leads to hierarchy, obedience, and the glorification of violence. Historical examples like Prussia and Nazi Germany demonstrate destruction and human rights violations. Electric Technocracy offers a way out: networked security, data-driven prevention, and conflict resolution instead of war. For a peaceful, collaborative future beyond military dogmas, focusing on global stability and human dignity
2 min read


No.23: System comparison: Anarchism vs Electric Technocracy
Anarchism: Utopia of freedom or dangerous chaos? This philosophy rejects all forms of rule, aiming for self-governance, but faces limitations: lack of protection, order, and infrastructure. Historical examples like Somalia show that anarchy often leads to violence. Electric Technocracy offers a stable way out: guaranteed freedom rights, digital coordination, and social security – without hierarchies, providing just, data-driven structures for a secure and cooperative society
2 min read

Legal explanations on the state succession deed 1400/98
can be found here:

Protest songs against the
Third World War WW3
Music has the power to unite people and stand up for peace. Discover three powerful protest songs directed against the horrors of a possible Third World War. Be inspired by their message and become part of a movement for a better world. Click on the links, listen and share the hope for peace:
bottom of page