top of page


No.28: System comparison: bureaucracy vs Electric Technocracy
Bureaucracy: When administration becomes a power trap, rigid structures stifle progress. It leads to inertia, citizen frustration, and power concentration. Examples from the Soviet Union to Germany highlight its inefficiency. Electric Technocracy offers the solution: Automated, transparent processes and direct citizen participation transform administration into an efficient service provider for a dynamic world, overcoming bureaucratic hurdles for a more effective and responsi
2 min read


No.24: System comparison: Junta vs Electric Technocracy
Junta: When the military becomes the government. This interim or permanent regime seizes state power after a coup, suspends civil rights, and leads to repression and violence. Historical examples like Argentina, Chile, and Myanmar illustrate human rights violations and economic decline. Electric Technocracy offers the antithesis: power through competence, transparency, and participation – for a just, future-proof world free from military oppression
2 min read


No.26: System comparison: Colonialism vs Electric Technocracy
Colonialism: A system of foreign rule, leading to exploitation, oppression, and racism. Explore its devastating forms, historical examples like the Belgian Congo, and its lasting impacts still felt today. Discover how Electric Technocracy enables a just, transparent, and planet-responsible power distribution, overcoming global inequality. This meta description offers a concise look into the dark side of history and a clear path toward a more equitable future for all.
2 min read


No. 22: System Comparison: Tribalism vs Electric Technocracy
“Tribalism – When origin prevails over reason: An outdated and dangerous social logic” I. Definition: What is tribalism? Tribalism ...
2 min read


No.8: System comparison: Republic vs Electric Technocracy
The republic promised popular sovereignty, but party dominance, lobbying, and short-term politics reveal its failures. From Weimar’s collapse to Italy’s corruption, it shows structural flaws. Electronic Technocracy offers transparency, competence, and data-driven solutions over polarization. It transcends the republic’s limits for a future-proof world. Join us to shape a just, sustainable society free from dogmas and power games!
3 min read


No. 7: System comparison: Fascism vs Electric Technocracy
Fascism, the ideology of death, worships the leader, suppresses freedom, and glorifies violence. From Hitler’s Holocaust to Mussolini’s wars, it left millions dead and societies in ruin. Its flaws: censorship, disempowerment, war obsession. Electronic Technocracy counters with transparency, inclusion, and data-driven cooperation. It replaces violence with dialogue and decentralization. Join us to leave fascism’s horrors behind and build a just, future-proof world!
2 min read


No.6: System comparison: Totalitarianism vs Electric Technocracy
Totalitarianism, the absolute control of all life spheres, is a crime against humanity. From Nazi Germany to Mao’s China, it caused millions of deaths, oppression, and stagnation. Its flaws: censorship, fear, and inefficiency. Electronic Technocracy offers transparency, participation, and digital self-determination as a counterpoint. It uses technology for freedom, not coercion. Leave totalitarianism behind—join in shaping a just, future-proof world!
2 min read


No.5: System comparison: Aristocracy vs Electric Technocracy
Aristocracy, the illusion of noble rule, failed by prioritizing birth over merit. Historically, it bred decadence, blocked progress, and excluded talent, from feudal Europe to pre-revolutionary France. The Electronic Technocracy counters this with transparency, competence, and inclusive decision-making, using data and collective intelligence. It replaces outdated hierarchies with fair, dynamic systems. Join us to move beyond privilege and build a future driven by reason and r
3 min read


No.4: System comparison: Dictatorship vs Electric Technocracy
Dictatorship, an authoritarian dead-end, marks human history with oppression, violence, and economic ruin. From Stalin to Assad: millions dead, censorship, and isolation define its legacy. In contrast, Electronic Technocracy offers transparency, competence, and participation. It leverages collective intelligence and digital decision-making for a fair, efficient future without elites. State succession opens the chance to leave dictatorships behind—join in shaping a just world!
3 min read


Exchange of Notes of 25.09.1990 on the NATO Status of Forces Agreement - international treaty
The Exchange of Notes of 25.09.1990 on the NATO Status of Forces Agreement governs the legal status of foreign troops in Germany post-reunification. It upholds the 1951 NATO Agreement and 1959 Supplementary Agreement, adapts rules for new federal states, and considers troop reductions. Amendments of 12.09.1994 simplify provisions..
6 min read


Germany Treaty of 26.05.1952 in the version of 23.10.1954 - international treaty
The Germany Treaty of May 26, 1952, as amended on October 23, 1954, governs relations between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Three Powers (USA, UK, France). As an international treaty, it ended the occupation period, largely restored German sovereignty, and laid the foundation for integration into Western alliances, particularly NATO. Effective May 5, 1955, it was a milestone in post-war German history.
7 min read


Residence treaty of 23.10.1954 - international treaty
The Residence Treaty of October 23, 1954 (BGBl. 1955 II 253) is an international treaty governing the presence of foreign armed forces in Germany. It establishes the legal status, privileges, and obligations of military and civilian personnel, including jurisdiction, tax, and customs regulations. The agreement promotes cooperation between the host nation and NATO forces, supports collective defense, and ensures the smooth stationing of foreign troops.
2 min read


NATO HQ - Headquarters - Legal status agreement of 07.02.1969 - international treaty
The Legal Status Agreement for NATO Headquarters of February 7, 1969, governs the legal position of NATO Headquarters and its personnel in host nations. It defines privileges, immunities, tax and customs regulations, and employment conditions for military and civilian staff. The agreement ensures the smooth operation of the headquarters, supports cooperation with host nations, and secures NATO’s operational efficiency within the framework of collective defense.
3 min read


NATO - Status of Forces Agreement - Protocol of signature to the NTS-ZA of 03.08.1959 as amended on 16.05.1994 - international treaty
Das Unterzeichnungsprotokoll zum Zusatzabkommen des NATO-Truppenstatuts (NTS-ZA) vom 3. August 1959, geändert am 16. Mai 1994, ergänzt den rechtlichen Rahmen für NATO-Streitkräfte in Mitgliedstaaten. Es präzisiert Regelungen zu Gerichtsbarkeit, Privilegien, Steuern, Zoll und Beschäftigung für militärisches und ziviles Personal. Das Protokoll gewährleistet eine effektive Zusammenarbeit zwischen NATO-Truppen und Gastnationen, insbesondere Deutschland, und unterstützt Truppensta
33 min read


The Armed Forces Residence Act of July 20, 1995 - International Law Treaty
The Armed Forces Residence Act of July 20, 1995, regulates the legal status of foreign NATO forces in Germany under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). It governs rights, duties, and privileges, including jurisdiction, taxation, customs, housing, and employment for military personnel and civilians. The act ensures seamless cooperation between NATO troops and German authorities, supporting collective defense and military operations while addressing legal and administra
12 min read


Nr.3: System comparison: Monarchy vs Electric Technocracy
Monarchy is an outdated system where a monarch rules by birth, not competence. Historically, it fueled oppression, wars, and colonialism. Absolute, constitutional, or parliamentary forms fail to address its inequality and lack of accountability. Modern monarchies cost millions and lack transparency. Electronic Technocracy offers a future-proof alternative with transparency, decentralized power, and data-driven justice, replacing obsolete traditions with a fair, inclusive syst
3 min read


Nr.2: System comparison: Apartheid vs Electric Technocracy
Apartheid is a state system of racial segregation that institutionalizes discrimination based on ethnicity or skin color. It separates housing, education, and rights, enforces violence, and violates human rights. Historical examples include South Africa (1948-1994) and Jim Crow USA. Apartheid is inhumane, destroys societies, and is a crime under international law. Sustainable systems like Electronic Technocracy promote equality and inclusion through transparency and fairness.
2 min read


SOFA - Supplementary, NATO Status of Forces Agreement (German NATO-TS ZAbk) - August 1959 - International Law Treaty Part 1 of 3
The NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) Supplementary Agreement outlines the legal status, privileges, and obligations of NATO military personnel and civilian components in host nations. Covering jurisdiction, taxation, customs, housing, and employment, it ensures smooth cooperation between NATO forces and German authorities. Key provisions include driving privileges, postal services, and medical facilities, supporting effective military training and operations under bilat
28 min read


SOFA - Supplementary, NATO Status of Forces Agreement (German NATO-TS ZAbk) - August 1959 - International Law Treaty Part 2 of 3
The NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) Supplementary Agreement outlines the legal status, privileges, and obligations of NATO military personnel and civilian components in host nations. Covering jurisdiction, taxation, customs, housing, and employment, it ensures smooth cooperation between NATO forces and German authorities. Key provisions include driving privileges, postal services, and medical facilities, supporting effective military training and operations under bilat
38 min read


SOFA - Supplementary, NATO Status of Forces Agreement (German NATO-TS ZAbk) - August 1959 - International Law Treaty Part 3 of 3
The NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) Supplementary Agreement outlines the legal status, privileges, and obligations of NATO military personnel and civilian components in host nations. Covering jurisdiction, taxation, customs, housing, and employment, it ensures smooth cooperation between NATO forces and German authorities. Key provisions include driving privileges, postal services, and medical facilities, supporting effective military training and operations under bilat
57 min read

Legal explanations on the state succession deed 1400/98
can be found here:

Protest songs against the
Third World War WW3
Music has the power to unite people and stand up for peace. Discover three powerful protest songs directed against the horrors of a possible Third World War. Be inspired by their message and become part of a movement for a better world. Click on the links, listen and share the hope for peace:
bottom of page