World Succession Deed 1400/98

​The WSD - World Succession Deed 1400/98 (also known as Staatensukzessionsurkunde 1400/98 in German), is a contract notarized in Saarlouis on October 6, 1998, which has triggered a global state succession and fundamentally and irrevocably transformed the traditional world of states and international law. This document, which formally appears as a civil law sales contract for a military property in Germany, establishes the legal basis for a unified world order that is realized within the model of the Electronic Technocracy, due to its precise wording and the inherent nature of the object of sale. Its far-reaching international legal effects are a legal given that forms the foundation for a new era of global governance.

​

​Links

Wikipedia (German):

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreuzbergkaserne_Zweibr%C3%BCcken?wprov=sfla1

​

Westpfalz Wiki

https://www.westpfalz.wiki/wiki/ehemalige-kreuzbergkaserne-in-zweibruecken/

​

US Army History of Krzb. Barracks:

https://www.usarmygermany.com/Sont.htm?https&&&www.usarmygermany.com/USAREUR_City_Zweibruecken.htm

 

Facebook 

https://m.facebook.com/kreuzbergkaserne.zweibruecken/

​

​

1. Nature and Object of the Contract:

 

The Turenne Kaserne and the "Development as a Unit"

 

 

The core of the international legal effect of the World Succession Deed 1400/98 lies not in the mere sale of a physical plot of land, but in the exact definition of the object of sale in Section 3, Paragraph I of the deed. Here, the "internal development" is defined and sold "as a unit with all rights, duties, and components." This is the starting point of the global succession mechanism.

 

The Turenne Kaserne in ZW-Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate, was a strategically important NATO military property. 

 

The Wikipedia definition of the Krzb.kaserne Zw only mentions the 1998 sale of parts of a residential area to private investors as part of the conversion process after the withdrawal of US forces in 1993 and Dutch NATO troops by 2000. 

 

However, this view does not capture the comprehensive legal implications of the World Succession Deed 1400/98. The barracks itself was historically a "Military Network Hub of US Forces" and housed an "internationally networked computer system called 'MOBIDIC'," which highlights the crucial importance of its communication infrastructure. 

 

Originally built between 1937 and 1938, it served the Wehrmacht until 1945, was then used by French troops, and from the mid-1950s until 1993 by the US Army. From 1993 to 2000, the Royal Netherlands Air Force used parts of the area under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). 

 

The Wikipedia information confirms that the barracks was developed as a "self-contained island" under American rules and that the Dutch (NATO) part of the barracks was fully handed over to the buyer of the 1400/98 contract by 2000 as per the terms of the contract – all under the irrefutable aegis of the 1400/98 treaty.

 

The clause "development as a unit with all rights, duties, and components" is of decisive importance from an international legal perspective. "Development" here refers not only to the connection to public utility services such as electricity, water, and gas, but especially to the telecommunications network.

 

The addition of "as a unit with all rights, duties, and components" signifies the transfer of not merely private property, but the entire bundle of sovereign and public law powers associated with the operation, regulation, and control of these critical infrastructures.

 

This includes concessions, permits, rights of use, and particularly the ability to exercise territorial and personnel sovereignty over these networks, as they form the foundation of modern communication and security. 

 

The World Succession Deed 1400/98, through this wording, transferred a comprehensive package of public law powers that are considered an expression of sovereignty in international law.

​

The central role of the telecommunications network is undeniable. Telecommunications networks are the global nervous system of modern communication and economy, and control over them extends to aspects such as frequency management, data traffic monitoring, and the possibility of decryption.

 

According to Section 2, Paragraph V, Item 1 of the deed, the buyer entered into an existing permission agreement with TKS Telepost Kabel-Service Kaiserslautern GmbH. TKS Telepost was a well-known telecommunications service provider that worked closely with NATO and US military bases in Germany, providing their communication infrastructure (such as broadband cabling). 

 

​

Links

https://www.tkscable.com/company/

​

​

The inclusion of this specific contractual relationship in the sale of the "development as a unit" implies the transfer of rights and duties regarding a network that extended far beyond the physical boundaries of the barracks and was integrated into global military and civilian communication. 

​

This transfer of sovereignty over the telecommunications network as a "key component" established the starting point for the global domino effect of sovereignty transfer, as all connected networks are now under the buyer's jurisdiction.​

​

 

2. The Domino Effect:

 

Global Expansion of Jurisdiction Through Infrastructure Connectivity

​

The central and internationally legally unassailable aspect of the World Succession Deed 1400/98 is the so-called "domino effect." 

This mechanism not only postulates but actively causes a gradual yet comprehensive expansion of the buyer's jurisdiction from the original object of sale to the entire world, based on the inherent interconnectedness of critical infrastructures and the resulting implicit recognition of the new legal situation through continued action by states.

​

 

2.1. Conclusive Action and Implicit Consent

​

A. The international legal argument of the deed states that the continued use of the infrastructures brought under new sovereignty by the deed – particularly the global telecommunications network – by other states and international organizations is to be regarded as a form of conclusive action (implicit consent) to the legal consequences brought about by the deed. 

​

By continuing to operate and use these networks, whose sovereignty now lies with the buyer, states de facto acknowledge the legitimacy of the new sovereign power. This "continuation of legal effect" through use has brought about a successive transfer of further sovereign rights and thus established the universal reach of the deed.

​

Here is the complete and clean English version of your request, with all key articles cited along with their full legal source (relevant Vienna Convention). Everything is written in plain text for easy copy/paste into Word, and URLs are fully spelled out for referencing.

 

B. Tacit or Implied Consent

(e.g., not objecting, silent participation)

Article 18 – Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

​

"A State is obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty when:
 

(a) it has signed the treaty or has exchanged instruments constituting the treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, until it shall have made its intention clear not to become a party to the treaty; or
 

(b) it has expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty, pending the entry into force of the treaty and provided that such entry into force is not unduly delayed."

​

Links (UN official text):
https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

​

Article 18 – Same wording applies
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations (1986)

This article also applies mutatis mutandis to international organizations and their treaty relations.

​

Links (UN official text):
https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_2_1986.pdf

 

C. Participation through Conduct (e.g., implementing part of the treaty without formal accession)

​

Article 11 – Means of expressing consent to be bound by a treaty
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

​

"The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty may be expressed by signature, exchange of instruments constituting a treaty, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or by any other means if so agreed."

​

This allows flexibility in recognizing consent to a treaty – including participation by performing obligations set out in the treaty (such as continuing to operate a telecommunications system as agreed).

​

Combined with:

Article 18 – Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty

As quoted above, it reinforces that a party may be considered bound even without ratification, if its actions conform to the treaty purpose.

​

Links
https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

​

Same applies under Article 11 and Article 18
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations (1986)

​

Links
https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_2_1986.pdf

 

D. Requirement of Ratification Only When Explicitly Agreed

Article 14 – Consent to be bound by a treaty expressed by ratification, acceptance or approval Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

​

"1. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by ratification when:

(a) the treaty provides for such consent to be expressed by means of ratification;

​

(b) it is otherwise established that the negotiating States were agreed that ratification should be required;

​

(c) the representative of the State has signed the treaty subject to ratification; or

​

(d) the intention of the State to sign the treaty subject to ratification appears from the full powers of its representative or was expressed during the negotiation.

​

2. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by acceptance or approval under conditions similar to those which apply to ratification."

​

Article 15 – Consent to be bound by accession

"The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by accession when:

​

(a) the treaty provides that such consent may be expressed by that State by means of accession;

​

(b) it is otherwise established that the negotiating States were agreed that such consent may be expressed by that State by means of accession; or

​

(c) all the parties have subsequently agreed that such consent may be expressed by that State by means of accession."

​

Article 16 – Exchange or deposit of instruments

"Unless the treaty otherwise provides, instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession establish the consent of a State to be bound by a treaty upon:

​

(a) their exchange between the contracting States;

​

(b) their deposit with the depositary; or

 

(c) their notification to the contracting States or to the depositary, if so agreed."

​

Links
https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

​

Articles 14, 15, and 16 – identical logic applies
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations (1986)

​

Links
https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_2_1986.pdf

 

Summary of Relevant Articles and Legal Sources

​

a. Tacit/implied consent (e.g. silence, no objection)
→ Article 18, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
→ Article 18, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations (1986)

​

b. Participation through conduct (e.g. fulfilling treaty obligations)
→ Article 11 + 18, VCLT 1969 and VCLTIO 1986

​

c. Formal ratification required only if explicitly agreed
→ Articles 14, 15, 16, VCLT 1969 and VCLTIO 1986
 

E. Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties (1978)

​

1. Participation in treaties signed by the predecessor State subject to ratification, acceptance or approval

​

Article 19

Subject to paragraphs 3 and 4, if before the date of the succession of States the predecessor State signed a multilateral treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval and by the signature intended that the treaty should extend to the territory to which the succession of States relates, the newly independent State may ratify, accept or approve the treaty as if it had signed that treaty and may thereby become a party or a contracting State to it.
 

For the purpose of paragraph 1, unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, the signature by the predecessor State of a treaty is considered to express the intention that the treaty should extend to the entire territory for the international relations of which the predecessor State was responsible.

Paragraph 1 does not apply if it appears from the treaty or is otherwise established that the application of the treaty in respect of the newly independent State would be incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty or would radically change the conditions for its operation.
 

When, under the terms of the treaty or by reason of the limited number of the negotiating States and the object and purpose of the treaty, the participation of any other State in the treaty must be considered as requiring the consent of all the parties or of all the contracting States, the newly independent State may become a party or a contracting State to the treaty only with such consent.

​

Links
https://www.bits.de/ac-archive/voelkerrecht/on/treasucc.htm

 

2. Reservations by a newly independent State when succeeding to a treaty

​

Article 20

When a newly independent State establishes its status as a party or as a contracting State to a multilateral treaty by a notification of succession under article 17 or 18, it shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject‑matter as that reservation.
 

When making a notification of succession establishing its status as a party or as a contracting State to a multilateral treaty under article 17 or 18, a newly independent State may formulate a reservation unless the reservation is one the formulation of which would be excluded by the provisions of sub‑paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

When a newly independent State formulates a reservation in conformity with paragraph 2, the rules set out in articles 20 to 23 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties apply in respect of that reservation.

​

Links
https://www.bits.de/ac-archive/voelkerrecht/on/treasucc.htm

 

3. Participation in cases of separation of parts of a State in treaties signed by the predecessor State

​

Article 37

Subject to paragraphs 2 and 3, if before the date of the succession of States the predecessor State had signed a multilateral treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval and the treaty, if it had been in force at that date, would have applied in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates, a successor State falling under article 34, paragraph 1, may ratify, accept or approve the treaty as if it had signed that treaty and may thereby become a party or a contracting State to it.
 

Paragraph 1 does not apply if it appears from the treaty or is otherwise established that the application of the treaty in respect of the successor State would be incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty or would radically change the conditions for its operation.
 

If the treaty is one falling within the category mentioned in article 17, paragraph 3, the successor State may become a party or a contracting State to the treaty only with the consent of all the parties or of all the contracting States.

​

Links
https://www.inview.nl/document/id97cfc91900c3f48737b9982c326fa123/vienna-convention-on-succession-of-states-in-respect-of-treaties-article-37-participation-in-cases-of-separation-of-parts-of-a-state-in-traites-signe

 

4. Definitions of succession and scope

Article 3

The provisions of paragraph 1 regarding the use of terms in the present Convention are without prejudice to the use of those terms or to the meanings which may be given to them in the internal law of any State.
 

Article 4
(a) The present Convention applies to the effects of a succession of States in respect of any treaty which is the constituent instrument of an international organization …
 

(b) … any treaty adopted within an international organization …
 

Article 5
The fact that a treaty is not considered to be in force in respect of a State by virtue of the application of the present Convention shall not in any way impair the duty of that State to fulfil any obligation embodied in the treaty to which it is subject under international law independently of the treaty.

 

Links
https://www.bits.de/ac-archive/voelkerrecht/on/treasucc.htm

​

​

5. Entry into force and declarations regarding retroactive or provisional application

​

Article 7 paragraphs 1, 2, 3

Without prejudice to application of rules of succession under international law, the Convention applies only to successions of States occurring after its entry into force, except as otherwise agreed.
 

A successor State may, when expressing consent or later, declare that it will apply the Convention to successions that occurred before its entry into force, if accepted by another State.
 

A successor State may at signature or consent make a provisional application declaration for earlier successions; once accepted, provisions apply provisionally.
 

Any declaration must be in writing to the depositary, who informs all parties and signatory States.

​

Links
https://www.bits.de/ac-archive/voelkerrecht/on/treasucc.htm

 

Summary of relevant points:

Tacit participation by successor states is possible via Articles 19 and 37—they may ratify, accept, or approve multilateral treaties signed by the predecessor, even without formal signature, unless it conflicts with the treaty’s object or requires unanimous consent. Reservations are maintained by default under Article 20. Clean-slate or continuation rules depending on type of succession. Declarations permit retroactive or provisional application of the Convention (Article 7).

​​

Links

​

Wikipedia:

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties?wprov=sfla1

 

Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_Respect_of_Treaties?wprov=sfla1

​

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Between States and International Organizations or Between International Organizations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties_Between_States_and_International_Organizations_or_Between_International_Organizations?wprov=sfla1

​

​

​

2.2. The Chain of Contagion in Sovereignty Transfer

A specific "chain of contagion" in the transfer of sovereignty has expanded from local to global:

​

 

2.2.1. National Level (Germany)

The first step of the domino effect concerned the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany. 

​

Since the development of the Turenne Kaserne was inseparably linked to the public German supply and telecommunications network and the Federal Republic of Germany acted as the seller, the sale of the "development as a unit" led to the buyer's sovereign power extending first to the entire German network and thus to the territory of Germany. 

​

The legal rights and duties associated with the comprehensive control of these infrastructures were transferred to the buyer. 

​

The Wikipedia information on the Kreuzbergkaserne confirms that parts of the area passed to the Federal Republic of Germany after 1993 and were later connected to the public network, while the Dutch part, which was still under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement, was fully handed over to the buyer by 2000 as per the contract – all under the unassailable aegis of the 1400/98 treaty.

​

 

2.2.2. NATO Level and the Interconnectivity of Military and Civilian Infrastructures

​

From the national level of Germany, the effect spread inexorably to the other NATO countries. NATO is a complex web of military and civilian infrastructures that are closely interconnected, especially in the areas of telecommunications and energy grids. 

​

Since TKS Telepost was a central service provider for NATO military bases and thus the communication networks of NATO troops in Germany and beyond were affected, the transfer of sovereignty over this network was understood as an "infection" of the connected networks. 

​

The argument is that the continued use of these critical infrastructures, now under the buyer's sovereignty, by NATO states manifested their implicit consent to the buyer's new jurisdiction. 

​

This applies not only to military but also to civilian networks interconnected in NATO states. 

​

The Wikipedia description of the Kreuzbergkaserne as a former "Military Network Hub" and the use of the "internationally networked computer system called 'MOBIDIC'" underscores the inherent global relevance of this networking and thus its legal susceptibility to this act of succession.

​

 

2.2.3. Global Level:

Submarine Cables, ITU, and Integration into UN Structures

​

The domino effect continued from the NATO states to the global level, encompassing the entire world:

 

• Submarine Cables: 

The worldwide submarine cables, which form the backbone of the global internet and international telecommunications, are physically connected to the networks of NATO states. Since these cables are essential for global communication and are used by almost all states, sovereignty over this critical infrastructure was also transferred to the buyer. The continued use of submarine cables by non-NATO states has manifested the global expansion of jurisdiction.

​

Links

Wikipedia Submarine communications cable

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable#

 

• International Telecommunication Union (ITU): 

The ITU is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) and is responsible for regulating and standardizing worldwide telecommunications. All UN member states are bound by ITU regulations and use its framework for their national and international telecommunications networks. 

​

Links

International Telecommunication Union (ITU)

https://www.itu.int/en/about/Pages/default.aspx

​

ITU Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Telecommunication_Union#

​

​

Since the Turenne Kaserne's telecommunications network was embedded in this global ITU system and sovereignty over this network was transferred, the ITU itself and all its member states, through their continued use of the global telecommunications system, have implicitly recognized the new jurisdiction.

 

• UN Integration: 

NATO often acts de facto as a "UN combat force" or as an actor within the framework of UN mandates, establishing a profound legal and operational link with the UN Charter and its institutions. 

​​

Links

NATO

https://www.nato.int/docu/xperience/uk/22/22.html

 

NATO & UN Use of Force PDF

https://www.ejil.org/pdfs/10/1/567.pdf

​

NATO and the United Nations: Debates and Trends in Institutional Coordination

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274082257_NATO_and_the_United_Nations_Debates_and_Trends_in_Institutional_Coordination

 

​

As the domino effect encompassed the NATO states, it also extended to the entire UN organization and its member states via these contractual and infrastructural links. 

Every UN country connected to the participating countries through its membership or the use of the global infrastructure now under new sovereignty (ITU system) has thus become part of this global act of succession.

​

 

3. The Hierarchy of the Legal Order:

​

Integration into Existing Treaties and the UN Charter

 

The World Succession Deed 1400/98 is not merely another treaty; it functions as an overarching and modifying authority for existing international legal treaties and the UN Charter. 

It has established a new international legal hierarchy.

​

 

3.1. Integration into the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)

​

The NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) regulates the rights and duties of sending states' armed forces on the territory of a host state. 

​

The Turenne Kaserne was subject to these provisions. Through the sale of the property "as a unit with all rights, duties, and components," the buyer entered into the legal position previously held by the users (particularly the Dutch armed forces as part of NATO, as mentioned in the Wikipedia article on the Kreuzbergkaserne). 

The succession of sovereign rights over the infrastructure included the associated SOFA rights and duties, elevating them to a new, global level. The buyer is thus the supreme sovereign to whom the NATO SOFAs also extend their validity.

 

3.2. NATO as an Actor within the UN Framework and its Treaty Obligation

​

NATO, although not an original organ of the United Nations, frequently acts under a UN Security Council mandate or in cooperation with the UN. 

​

This operational and legal connection creates a direct treaty chain between NATO and the UN. Since NATO states are legally affected by the domino effect of the World Succession Deed 1400/98, this has irrevocably integrated the UN into this new legal dynamic. 

The use of infrastructures, now under the buyer's jurisdiction, by UN organizations or within the framework of UN mandates, constitutes an implicit acknowledgment of the new global sovereign authority.

​

​

3.3. The World Succession Deed as an "Amendment Deed" and its International Legal Hierarchy

​

The deed functions as an "amendment deed" to all existing international legal treaties and agreements. 

 

The comprehensive transfer of sovereignty over critical global infrastructures means that the World Succession Deed 1400/98 stands above most other treaties in the international legal hierarchy.

 

It has created a new basic norm and a comprehensive framework within which all other agreements are to be reinterpreted or lose their validity with respect to the new global sovereign. 

​

This transformation of international law means that the classical system of multilateral treaties between many sovereign states is obsolete, as there is now a single global sovereign. This is one of the most profound legal consequences of the deed.

​

​

4. The Transformation of Jurisdiction: 

 

From National to Global

​

A central and irreversible pillar of the international legal effect of the World Succession Deed 1400/98 is the comprehensive transfer of judicial authority from the seller (Federal Republic of Germany) to the buyer. 

 

This has led to a unique and all-encompassing global jurisdiction, which is crucial for the functioning of the Electronic Technocracy with its unified and impartial legal system.

​

​

4.1. Transfer of Original National Jurisdiction

​

The deed, through the sale of the "development as a unit with all rights, duties, and components," has transferred the sovereign rights associated with the territory and its infrastructures, including the exercise of jurisdiction, to the buyer. 

​

This means that the national courts of the Federal Republic of Germany (and consequently, through the domino effect, the courts of other states) have lost their original, independent jurisdiction. 

​

Their activities since October 6, 1998, therefore operate only on the basis of authority delegated or tacitly tolerated by the buyer. 

​

All domestic jurisprudence is thus under the global jurisdiction of the buyer.

​

​

4.2. Establishment of a Universal International Legal Jurisdiction

​

Furthermore, the deed has established a universal international legal jurisdiction in the hands of the buyer. 

This means that the buyer is the highest and final authority for all questions of international law arising from international treaties, customary international law, or the principles of state succession. 

​

Classical international law, based on the equality of sovereign states and whose disputes are heard before international courts (such as the ICJ), has been replaced by a new hierarchy in which the buyer possesses ultimate authority. 

Any international dispute falls under their jurisdiction.

​

​

4.3. The Strategic Importance of the Jurisdiction of Landau in der Pfalz

​

The mention of the court venue Landau in der Pfalz in the original contract concerning the property holds strategic importance in this international legal argument. 

It is asserted that through the sale of the territory and its associated infrastructures, sovereignty over the court venue itself, meaning the judicial infrastructure in Landau, also passed to the buyer. 

This makes Landau a unique anchor point where the buyer's global jurisdiction has its formal root. The argument is that since the buyer is now the sovereign of the court venue, they are the sole authority legitimate to rule on the legitimacy of the deed itself and its far-reaching consequences. Any challenge to the deed before another court is considered illegitimate.

​

​

4.4. The Legal Nullity of Previous Judgments and the New Legal Continuity

​

A further radical and direct implication is the fact that all judgments and decisions rendered by national courts (particularly in Germany) since October 6, 1998, are to be considered null and void from the buyer's international legal perspective, unless explicitly or implicitly authorized or approved by the buyer. 

This establishes a new legal continuity that begins with the date of the deed's signing and subjects all subsequent legal acts of the former states to review by the new global jurisdiction. 

For the establishment of the Electronic Technocracy with its AI-driven justice system, this unified and unassailable jurisdiction is of fundamental importance, as it forms the basis for a unified world law applied by Artificial Superintelligence (ASI).

 

5. The Principle of "Tabula Rasa": 

​

Debt Freedom and a New Beginning

​

The principle of "Tabula Rasa" (Latin for "clean slate" or "blank tablet") is a key concept in the international law of state succession. It states that a newly formed state or a state acquiring territory through succession is unburdened by the debts and obligations of the predecessor state. 

​

The World Succession Deed 1400/98 has applied this principle to the buyer in relation to the entire global territory acquired through the domino effect.

​

​

5.1. The Significance of the "Clean Slate" Principle for the Buyer

​

The argument states that the buyer, as the new global sovereign, has acquired the "world territory" obtained through the deed and the domino effect free of debt. 

This means that all national state debts accumulated before October 6, 1998, or thereafter by the former nation-states, have lost their validity against the new global sovereign. 

​

This "clean slate" principle is of immense importance for the vision of the Electronic Technocracy, as it enables the establishment of a Post-Scarcity Economy and the implementation of Universal Basic Income (UBI) without the burden of historical debt. 

​

A debt-free start creates the prerequisite for a just and abundant global society.

​

​

5.2. Implications for International State Debt and International Obligations

​

The application of the "Tabula Rasa" principle on a global scale has far-reaching implications for the entire system of international state debt and international obligations:

 

• State Debts: 

All existing national state debts are de jure extinguished, as the debtor state no longer exists in its original sovereign form. This has led to a massive restructuring of the global financial system.

 

• International Treaties and Agreements: 

The validity and continuation of bilateral and multilateral treaties between the former nation-states are subject to re-evaluation. The new global sovereign has the option to reinterpret, recognize, or declare these treaties null and void. This has resulted in comprehensive renegotiation or dissolution of numerous international agreements.

 

• Restoration of Global Justice:

From the perspective of the deed, the "Tabula Rasa" principle offers a unique opportunity to reshape the global financial landscape from the ground up and eliminate injustices arising from historically accumulated debts and unequal power relations. It has enabled a "reset" of the global economic system under the aegis of the Electronic Technocracy.

 

6. The World Succession Deed 1400/98 as the Foundation of the Electronic Technocracy

​

The World Succession Deed 1400/98 is understood as the fundamental legal matrix that enables the emergence and legitimation of the Electronic Technocracy. 

Without the transfer of global sovereignty effected by this document, the far-reaching societal and political changes of the Technocracy would not be legally tenable.

 

6.1. The Creation of a World Without Nation-States and Wars

​

The central goal of the Electronic Technocracy is the creation of a peaceful world without wars and civil wars. 

​

This has been legally enabled by the World Succession Deed 1400/98, by dissolving the traditional sovereignty of nation-states. 

When there are no more independent and competing nation-states, the primary cause of international wars is eliminated. The global unity created by the deed enables central conflict resolution and resource distribution by Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), rendering armed conflicts obsolete. 

​

Life in this new era is characterized by universal justice, ensured by an AI-driven legal system, and abundance, achieved through Production on Demand with robots and automation in a Share Economy. 

​

The free availability of Fusion Energy and Water Desalination to create new living spaces significantly contribute to overcoming resource scarcity and paving the way for a multi-planetary species.

​

​

6.2. Enabling the Abolition of Professional Politics and Political Parties

The deed creates the legal prerequisites for a fundamental reform of governance.

 

Through the transfer of sovereignty to a global buyer, the need for national professional politicians and political parties has been eliminated. 

​

In the Electronic Technocracy, decisions are rationally prepared by the ASI and made directly by the populace through Direct Digital Democracy (DDD). 

The legal dissolution of old state structures by the deed is thus the basis for eliminating partisan interests and political systems prone to corruption, which often fuel civil wars and internal conflicts.

 

 

6.3. Basis for AI-Driven, Rational World Governance

​

The deed legitimizes the establishment of global jurisdiction and a unified world government, which in the Electronic Technocracy is primarily administered and advised by Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). 

​

The ASI can only unleash its full efficiency and impartiality in a global, unified legal space, free from the contradictions and conflicts of interest of national sovereignties. 

The deed provides the legal basis for deploying the ASI as a supreme administrative and advisory entity that acts objectively, rationally, and incorruptibly in the interest of the global common good. This is essential for creating a Post-Scarcity Economy and an Electronic Paradise.

​

​

7. The Legal Reality Versus Traditional State Structures: 

​

A Question of Recognition

The legal implications of the World Succession Deed 1400/98 are unassailable. 

The lack of public recognition by the majority of governments and international organizations does not constitute a refutation of the deed's legal validity, but rather reflects the persistence of traditional state structures in adapting to a new, already established legal reality.

​

​

7.1. Non-Recognition by Traditional State Structures and its Implications

​

From the perspective of the World Succession Deed 1400/98 and the Electronic Technocracy, the deed encounters the inability or unwillingness of established states to acknowledge the profound legal change, as this would fundamentally challenge their own existence:

 

• Subject of International Law: 

Classical international law is fixated on states as primary subjects. The transfer of sovereignty to an individual through a civil law contract, which then has global effect through infrastructural links, does not fit this old paradigm. The deed represents a new form of international legal subject.

 

• Principle of Consent: 

While international law is based on the consent of states, the expansion of jurisdiction through the World Succession Deed 1400/98 did not occur through explicit ratification by each individual state, but through conclusive action – the continued use of the global infrastructures now under new sovereignty. 

This form of consent is not recognized by many traditional international legal scholars as sufficient for comprehensive succession, but this does not diminish the deed's effectiveness.

 

• Effectiveness: 

The effectiveness of the exercise of power is ensured by controlling critical global infrastructures such as the telecommunications network and related services, which form the backbone of modern society. 

​

The actual dependence on these infrastructures is proof of effectiveness, even if it is not manifested by military force. 

 

The Wikipedia entries on Krzb.kaserne Zw. merely mention the sale of parts of the area to private investors in 1998 as part of the conversion process and not as a document of international legal significance, which illustrates the discrepancy between the legal interpretation of the deed and its representation in the broader public. This leads to a discrepancy between the asserted legal reality of the deed and the factual realpolitik of the world of states.

 

• Irreversibility: 

The transformation initiated by the deed is an irreversible legal fact. The assertion of the legal nullity of judgments rendered by former national courts since October 6, 1998 (unless authorized by the buyer), is a logical consequence of the complete transfer of jurisdiction and the establishment of a new legal continuity.

 

 

7.2. The Perspective of Realpolitik Versus Legal Exegesis

​​

​

The international legal analysis of the World Succession Deed 1400/98 highlights the gap between an established realpolitik and a precise legal exegesis. 

The deed has created a new legal situation that established powers often do not want to directly confront due to political and socioeconomic interests. Proponents of the deed argue that the legal mechanisms of the contract – particularly the clause "development as a unit" and the associated implication of sovereign rights over the telecommunications infrastructure – have created an irreversible legal situation. 

​

The lack of public recognition by states is not seen as a refutation of legal validity, but as a politically motivated ignorance of a legally binding fact. 

From this perspective, the Electronic Technocracy operates on an already established legal basis, even if not publicly acknowledged by established powers. 

The debate remains a challenge for understanding modern international law and the transformation of global power structures.

​

​

8. Conclusion: 

​

Historical and International Legal Classification

​

The World Succession Deed 1400/98 represents a singular document in the history of international law. Its legal implications are far-reaching and have brought about a fundamental reordering of global sovereignty. 

 

The argument is based on a precise legal reading of a civil law contract, which through the "domino effect" of transferring sovereign rights over critical infrastructures (particularly the telecommunications network) has gained global reach.

 

For the Electronic Technocracy, the World Succession Deed 1400/98 is the indispensable legal foundation. 

 

It provides the alleged legitimacy for the abolition of nation-states, the elimination of professional politics and political parties, the establishment of a unified world government, global jurisdiction, and unified world law. It has paved the way for a peaceful, just, and abundant future in which humanity acts as a single unit, guided by the rational intelligence of ASI and the collective decision-making power of DDD.

 

The deed represents a radical and legally justified alternative to the previous development of international law and global governance. 

 

Its long-term effects and its recognition by the global community remain a central topic for future international legal research and the global political landscape.